Large-scale dynamos at low magnetic Prandtl numbers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Large-scale dynamos at low magnetic Prandtl numbers

Description:

Boldyrev & Cattaneo (2004): relation to roughness. Ponty et al.: (2005): levels off at PrM=0.2 ... Boldyrev & Cattaneo (2004) Schekochihin et al (2005) k. 6 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: axel64
Learn more at: https://www.nordita.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Large-scale dynamos at low magnetic Prandtl numbers


1
Large-scale dynamos at low magnetic Prandtl
numbers
above, below, and inside the lab PrMn/h10-5
  • Small-scale dynamos
  • Progressively harder to excite at low PrM
  • But may level off
  • Large-scale dynamos
  • Independent of PrM
  • Low PrM can be used to filter out SS dynamo
  • Most of energy dissipated Ohmically
  • Can decrease n even further
  • Axel Brandenburg (Nordita, Stockholm)

2
Winter School 11-22 January
3
Small-scale vs large-scale dynamo
4
Low PrM results
  • Small-scale dynamo Rm.crit35-70 for PrM1
    (Novikov, Ruzmaikin, Sokoloff 1983)
  • Leorat et al (1981) independent of PrM (EDQNM)
  • Rogachevskii Kleeorin (1997) Rm,crit412
  • Boldyrev Cattaneo (2004) relation to roughness
  • Ponty et al. (2005) levels off at PrM0.2

5
Maybe no small scale surface dynamo?
Small PrMn/h stars and discs around NSs and
YSOs
Schekochihin et al (2005)
k
Boldyrev Cattaneo (2004)
6
Levels off for Taylor-Green flow
  • Confirmation for finite Rm for SS dynamo?
  • Or effect of LS dynamo?

7
Hyperviscous, Smagorinsky, normal
height of bottleneck increased
Haugen Brandenburg (PRE, astro-ph/0402301)
onset of bottleneck at same position
Inertial range unaffected by artificial diffusion
8
Re-appearence at low PrM
Gap between 0.05 and 0.2 ?
Iskakov et al (2005)
9
Fully helical turbulence
Here Rmurmsl/h
Brandenburg (2001, ApJ)
10
ABC flow dynamo
Mininni et al. (2007, PRE)
  • Rm,crit varies still by factor 2
  • Spectral magnetic energy peaks at k1

11
Cartesian box MHD equations
Magn. Vector potential
Induction Equation
Momentum and Continuity eqns
Viscous force
forcing function
(eigenfunction of curl)
12
Growth rate
  • Growth rate scaling for large Rm as for SS dynamo
  • Helical dynamo still excited for low Rm

13
Kinematic regime
14
Kinematic vs saturated regime
15
Spectra in kinematic regime
  • Kazantsev scaling for PrM1
  • Progressively more energy at large scale

16
Compensated spectra
kinematic
saturated
17
Low PrM dynamoswith helicity do work
  • Energy dissipation via Joule
  • Viscous dissipation weak
  • Can increase Re substantially!

18
PrM1, saturated case
19
U and B fields minor changes
20
Conclusions
1) low PrM helps to distinguish LS and SS dynamos
  • LS dynamo must be excited
  • SS dynamo too dominant, swamps LS field
  • Dominant SS dynamo artifact of large PrMn/h

Brun, Miesch, Toomre (2004, ApJ 614, 1073)
2) Important also for accretion disc dynamos
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com