EAI WG Agenda@IETF-66

1
EAI WG Agenda_at_IETF-66

• Email Address Internationalization

2
Agenda

• Agenda bashing
• Comments?
• Minutes taker?
• Documents Status
• Active Drafts Review(8 drafts, and 2
  demonstrations)
• draft-ietf-eai-framework-01.txt (J. Klensin)(5
  minutes)
• draft-ietf-eai-scenarios-01.txt (J. Klensin does
  for Harald)(5 minutes)
• draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-00.txt (J. Yao)(5 minutes)
  
• Testing Report by CNNIC (J.Yao)(5 minutes)
• draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-00.txt (N. Hsu)(5
  minutes)
• Testing Report by TWNIC (N. Hsu)(5 minutes)
• draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-00.txt (P. Resnick)(5
  minutes)
• draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist-00.txt (Edmon
  Chung)(10 minutes)
• draft-ietf-eai-pop-00.txt(Chris Newman)(5
  minutes) no presentation, only comments for draft
  
• draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-01.txt ( K. Fujiwara)(15
  minutes)
• Outstanding Issues
• Current 5 issues, to be supplied

3
Documents Status Summary

• Interim Meeting (Beijing) in June 6, 2006
• 6 WG drafts, transfer from individual drafts to
  WG drafts
• Current
• 8 WG Drafts, 3 in version01, 5 in version00, one
  is fresh
• draft-ietf-eai-framework-01.txt, Published in
  2006.06.26
• draft-ietf-eai-scenarios-01.txt , Published in
  2006.06.29
• draft-ietf-eai-smtpext-00.txt , Published in
  2006.05.12
• draft-ietf-eai-utf8headers-00.txt, Published in
  2006.06.05
• draft-ietf-eai-imap-utf8-00.txt, Published in
  2006.05.31
• draft-ietf-eai-mailinglist-00.txt, Published in
  2006.06.22
• draft-ietf-eai-pop-00.txt, Published in
  2006.06.28
• draft-ietf-eai-downgrade-01.txt, Published in
  2006.06.29

4
Outstanding Issues

• ATOMIC issues, Do we need ATOMIC? and if ATOMIC
  (or equivalent) are permitted, is the combination
  of ATOMIC and ALT-ADDRESS
• (i) an error
• or (ii) an indication that ATOMIC should
  essentially be ignored.
• Is the syntax for 'alt address' in the envelope
  to use 2821 parameters or some trick inside the
  pointed brackets? How about inside the headers?
• Do we need new extended error codes to cover the
  bouncing and downgrade cases?
• Encapsulation Model issue. Do we really have a
  satisfactory model for encapsulation yet?
• Terminology unification