Lattice results on QCDstrings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Lattice results on QCDstrings

Description:

Bandwidth between processors on same node: 864 MB/s ... is a consequence of such quantisations, so why should one place too much weight ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: DASS6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lattice results on QCDstrings


1
Lattice results on QCD-strings
  • N.D. Hari Dass
  • Institute of Mathematical Sciences
  • Chennai
  • In collaboration with Dr Pushan Majumdar, U.
    Muenster

2
(No Transcript)
3
More on KABRU
  • 144 Dual Xeons _at_ 2.4 GHz, 533 MHz FSB, 266 MHz
    DDRAM memory (2GB per node on 120 nodes and 4GB
    per node on 24 nodes totaling 336 GB)
  • Networking is through 3D torus SCI (Dolphinics)
    (6x6x4)
  • Network attached storage 1.5 TB
  • Sustained Node to Node Bandwidth 318 MB/s
  • Bandwidth between processors on same node 864
    MB/s
  • Latency 3.8 ms between different nodes and 0.7
    ms on same node
  • HPL performance 1.002 Teraflop sustained (Peak
    1382)
  • Scaling on MILC codes ks_imp_dyn1 (75-80) on
    pure_gauge (85)

4
Understanding nuclear forces
  • The challenge in the beginning was to understand
    the structure and stability of atomic nucleus.
  • Initially it was thought that protons, neutrons
    and pions were the elementary constituents and
    that the exchange of pions between protons and
    neutrons gave rise to the attractive nuclear
    forces.

5
Proliferation of particles.
  • But with higher and higher energy collisions more
    and more particles other than the protons,
    neutrons and pions were produced.
  • The simple picture of protons, neutrons and pions
    as the elementary constituents of nuclear matter
    was not viable.
  • Two proposals came to be made almost concurrently
    to face the situation.

6
The hadronic string
  • Chew and Frautschi observed that all the new
    particles produced lay on parallel lines (Regge
    trajectories) when their masses(or squared
    masses) were plotted against their angular
    momenta.
  • Veneziano proposed a simple formula for the
    scattering amplitudes for the new particles.
  • Nambu, Nielsen and Susskind made the astonishing
    proposal that both the Veneziano formula and the
    Regge trajectories could be understood if the
    particles were states of excitation of a
    relativistic string.

7
Problems with hadronic strings
  • The full consistency of the hadronic string model
    required space-time to have 10 dimensions.
  • Closer inspection of the spectrum of these
    strings revealed states that could not be
    hadronic states e.g massless spin-2 states.
  • Such states would violate the so called Froissart
    bound for scattering amplitudes.
  • Subsequently it was proposed not to use string
    theories to explain hadronic physics but as a
    means of unifying all interactions including
    gravity.

8
Quark model
  • At around the same time Gellmann and Zweig
    independently proposed the quark model.
  • According to this protons are constituted by 3
    quarks, 2 u-quarks of 2/3 electric charge and
    one d-quark of -1/3 charge. Likewise neutron
    constituents were 2 d-quarks and one u-quark.
  • Pions were made up of a quark and anti-quark
    pair.
  • The quarks were taken to be spin ½ particles.

9
Quark model..
  • To overcome problems with Pauli exclusion
    principle, Nambu proposed that each quark comes
    with 3 different colours .
  • This model was extremely succesful as
    book-keeping for the myriad of particles and
    could even explain some features like the
    observed magnetic moments.
  • Attention then turned to constructing a theory
    for the interaction between quarks.
  • Gellmann, Minkowski and Fritzsch proposed QCD
    with vector interactions motivated by the
    observed chiral symmetry among hadrons.

10
What is QCD? More technically
  • QCD is a non-Abelian Gauge Theory.
  • The gauge group is SU(3).
  • The Quarks carry the fundamental representation
    3.
  • The Gluons, which transmit the forces between
    quarks, carry the adjoint representation 8.
  • 3 has triality, 8 has no triality.
  • The theory in its nonperturbative domain has
    defied analytical approach despite the best
    efforts for more than 25 years.
  • It is an outstanding problem of theoretical
    physics.

11
Quarks and Gluons of SU(3) QCD
12
(No Transcript)
13
Quark Confinement
  • Quarks are not liberated even in very high energy
    collisions!
  • The theory of Quarks must be such that they can
    never be free!

14
The dual superconductor idea
15
(No Transcript)
16
Lattice
17
Lattice QCD
18
(No Transcript)
19
Wilson Loop
20
Numerical Evidence For Flux Tubes
21
Our Simulations
  • We measure the qqbar-potential of d4 su(3) pure
    gauge theory extremely accurately on 243x32 and
    324 lattices at b 5.7
  • Lattice spacing a 1/6 fm so temporal extent is
    nearly 5.3 fm while spatial extent is 4fm3.
  • We use Polyakov Loop Correlation Function to
    measure the potential.
  • We use the Luscher-Weisz Multilevel algorithm.
  • We also use the analytical multihit method to
    achieve speedup(60).

22
Type of accuracies needed
  • The polyakov loop correlator is a stochastic
    variable of nearly unit magnitude.
  • At a separation of r8 the average value of this
    is around 10 -26
  • It roughly falls by two orders of magnitude with
    every increase in r by unity.
  • This too needs to be measured at fraction of a
    percent if string-like behaviour is to be
    extracted.
  • Without the multihit and multilevel methods this
    would be a hopeless task.

23
Polyakov Loop Correlators
24
Luscher-Weisz Multilevel Algorithm
25
(No Transcript)
26
Some string actions and potentials
27
Results of Luscher and Weisz
28
Initial Conclusions of Luscher and Weisz
  • The coefficient of the 1/r term in the qqbar
    potential agrees to within 15 from that of the
    free bosonic string theory in the distance range
    0.5-1.0 fm.
  • They argued that the discrepancy could be due to
    boundary terms and other interaction terms.
  • They found that a boundary term with b.04 could
    accommadate the data well.
  • They found it surprising that even at 0.5fm there
    was evidence for string behaviour.

29
The Work of Kuti et al
  • Kuti et al have undertaken very detailed studies
    of the spectrum of string excitations.
  • They use the extended Wilson loops for this
    purpose.
  • They use 242x30x60 lattice with as 0.2 fm and
    at .04 fm so that their longest time extent is
    2.4 fm.

30
Wilson Loops for Spectrum Studies
31
Results of Kuti et al
32
Spectrum according to Kuti et al
33
Summary of Results of Kuti et al
  • The ordering of the spectrum does not agree with
    that of the bosonic string even upto nearly 3fm.
  • There is a systematic overshooting of the string
    results as one goes to larger and larger
    distances.
  • The data fits the free bosonic string ground
    state energy very well in the range 0.5-1.0 fm.

34
Our Simulation Results
35
Force vs Distance
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Summary of Our Results
  • We do not see any obvious convergence to either
    Nambu-Goto or free bosonic string to even upto
    0.75 fm.
  • As r approaches 1 fm we see clear convergence to
    the Nambu-Goto potential.
  • We see very clear discrepancy with the free
    bosonic string expectations. In fact a fit to
    this behaviour produces very poor c2

39
Luscher-weisz Revisited
  • How then do we reconcile our conclusions with
    those of Luscher-Weisz who had suggested onset of
    string behaviour as early as 0.5 fm by ascribing
    the differences over free string behaviour to
    boundary terms?
  • In 2004 they showed that Open String Closed
    String duality forbids boundary terms of the type
    considered before.
  • It is better to interpret the results as string
    behaviour not setting so soon.

40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
But Nambu-Goto string is inconsistent in d4
  • Though the data picks the Nambu-Goto potential so
    accurately, there is a serious problem!
  • This string theory can be consistently quantised
    only in d26
  • The Luscher term is a consequence of such
    quantisations, so why should one place too much
    weight on its occurrence?

43
Effective string theories
  • Polchinski and Strominger in 1992 set out to
    formulate effective string theories and their
    quantisations.
  • This is similar in spirit to effective theories
    like chiral models for the description of pions.
  • Non-polynomial, non-renormalisable.
  • Designed so that quantisation preserves Lorentz
    Invariance.
  • Leading correction to the linear potential is
    again exactly the old Luscher term.
  • What are the corrections and how well does data
    fit them? Tachyons?

44
Are string and gauge theories dual to each
  • Polyakov and others believe that gauge and string
    descriptions are dual to each other.
  • This is also the content of Maldacenas AdS/CFT
    correspondence.
  • This is expected to hold even for
    non-supersymmetric theories like QCD.
  • Satchi Naik (HRI) showed how all these theories
    give the conventional Luscher term.
  • The d3 case is more straightforward in this
    picture.

45
What Next?
  • Push the simulations to larger and larger
    distances.
  • Very time consuming! With each dr 1 the
    simulation time increases by 2 and already at r7
    it takes a day for 3 meas and for good statistics
    one needs about 500 meas!
  • Probe effective string theories as well as
    AdS/CFT correspondence deeper.
  • Extrinsic curvature strings.
  • Investigate the Center issue investigate adjoint
    strings (large memory and large simulation time).
  • Investigate Center-less groups like SO(3), G2 etc
  • Investigate z(3) gauge theories.
  • Investigate baryons and effective string
    coupling. Construct an effective QCD String
    Theory.
  • The eventual goal is solving the Quark
    Confinement Problem
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com