Statistical Model Predictions for p p and Pb Pb Collisions at LHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Statistical Model Predictions for p p and Pb Pb Collisions at LHC

Description:

large systems, large number of produced hadrons ... Chemical decoupling conditions extracted from SIS up to RHIC feature common ... Cluster radius RC from data ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: ingrid72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Statistical Model Predictions for p p and Pb Pb Collisions at LHC


1
Statistical Model Predictions for pp and PbPb
Collisions at LHC
  • Ingrid Kraus
  • Nikhef and TU Darmstadt

2
Outline
  • Predictions for PbPb collisions at LHC
  • Extrapolation of thermal parameters, predictions
  • Experimental observables for T and µB
    determination
  • From PbPb to pp system size and energy
    dependence
  • Model ansatz with correlated, equilibrated
    clusters
  • Analysed data and results
  • Predictions for pp collisions at LHC
  • Driven by initial or final state?
  • Summary
  • in Collaboration with H. Oeschler, K. Redlich, J.
    Cleymans, S. Wheaton

3
Hadron ratios in the grand canonical ensemble
  • Grand canonical ensemble
  • large systems, large number of produced hadrons
  • two parameters describe particle ratios in the
    hadronic final state

A. Andronic, P. Braun-Munzinger, J. Stachel,
Nucl. Phys. A772 (2006) 167
4
Thermal Parameters in PbPb
Phys. Rev. C 73(2006) 034905
  • On the freeze-out curve
  • TLHC TRHIC 170 MeV
  • T TC 170 MeV
  • µB from parametrised
  • freeze-out curve
  • µB (v(sNN) 5.5TeV) 1 MeV
  • Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 034905
  • Grand canonical ensemble
  • for PbPb predictions

5
Predictions for PbPb
  • Reliable for stable particles
  • Benchmark for resonances
  • Errors
  • T 170 /- 5 MeV
  • µB 1 4 MeV
  • Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 034903

- 1
All calculations with THERMUS hep-ph/0407174
6
T and µB dependence I mixed ratios
  • Controlled by masses
  • Weakly dep. on µB and T
  • µB term cancels
  • larger contributions from resonances at higher T

7
T and µB dependence I mixed ratios
  • Controlled by masses
  • Weakly dep. on µB and T
  • µB term cancels
  • larger contributions from resonances at higher T

8
T and µB dependence I mixed ratios
  • Controlled by masses
  • Weakly dep. on µB and T
  • µB term cancels
  • larger contributions from resonances at higher T
  • K/p
  • not usable for T and mB determination
  • good test of predictions

9
T and µB dependence II h/h ratios
_
  • Sensitive on µB
  • µS opposite trend of µB
  • determine µB from p/p
  • weakly dep. on T

?
_
10
T dependence ratios with large mass differences
  • Ratios with larger mass differences are more
    sensitive
  • T from W / p and/or W / K

?
11
Canonical suppression
  • Canonical ensemble
  • small systems / peripheral collisions, low
    energies
  • suppressed phase-space for particles related to
    conserved charges
  • Stronger suppression for multi-strange hadrons
  • Suppression depends on strangeness content, not
    difference

12
Canonical suppression
  • Canonical ensemble
  • small systems / peripheral collisions, low
    energies
  • suppressed phase-space for particles related to
    conserved charges
  • Stronger suppression for multi-strange hadrons
  • Suppression depends on strangeness content, not
    difference
  • Suppressed strangeness production beyond
    canonical suppression

SPS v(sNN) 17 AGeV
13
Modification of the model
  • Statistical Model approach T and µB
  • Volume for yields ? radius R used here
  • Deviations strangeness undersaturation factor gS
  • Fit parameter
  • Alternative small clusters (RC) in fireball (R)
    RC R
  • Chemical equilibrium in subvolumes canonical
    suppression
  • RC free parameter
  • Study
  • pp, CC, SiSi, PbPb / AuAu collisions
  • at SPS and RHIC energies

R
RC
14
System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
  • Small clusters in all systems
  • Small system size dependence
  • pp
  • energy dependence?
  • PbPb / AuAu
  • data consistent with saturated strangeness
    production

pp CC SiSi Pb/Au
15
System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
RC R
PbPb AuAu
  • AA clusters smaller than fireball
  • RC not well defined for RC 2 fm because
    suppression vanishes

16
System size and energy dependence of the cluster
size
RC R
PbPb AuAu
  • Particle ratios saturate at RC 2 - 3 fm
  • no precise determination for weak strangeness
    suppression

17
Extrapolation to LHC T - mB systematics
Phys. Rev. C 73(2006) 034905
  • Chemical decoupling conditions extracted from SIS
    up to RHIC feature common behavior
  • Extrapolation to LHC energy with parametrisation
    e.g.
  • Nucl. Phys. A 697 (2002) 902

18
System size and energy dependence of T and mB
  • T, µB weakly dependent on system size

pp CC SiSi Pb/Au
19
Extrapolation to LHC cluster size
  • what defines RC in pp?
  • initial size of pp system relevant
  • RC const
  • final state of large number of produced hadrons
    relevant
  • RC increases with multiplicity

20
Prediction for pp
  • significant increase of ratios at RC 1.5 fm
  • K / p and W / X behave differently
  • multistrange hadrons suffer stronger suppression
  • RC will be determined with ALICE data

21
Extraction of RC
  • Particle ratios w/o strangeness are insensitive
    to RC
  • Sensitivity increases with strangeness difference
  • RC from W / p

?
22
Summary
  • pp
  • predictions difficult due to unknown degree of
    canonical suppression
  • Cluster radius RC from data
  • PbPb
  • predictions for particle ratios with extrapolated
    parameters T, µB
  • T, µB determination with p / p and W / K or W / p
    ratios

_
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com