Notes'' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

Notes''

Description:

As with looking at any group over time, be sure to take into account mobility ... If you are going to build a query with specific grade levels, don't forget to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:20
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: cssu
Category:
Tags: goingover | notes

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Notes''


1
Notes..
  • This presentation was developed by Vermont Data
    Consortium and is intended to serve as a generic
    template for anyone who is in the position of
    presenting their NECAP data to their school
    board, community, teachers or administrators.
  • It is intentionally very large (too large) for
    most presentations. Decide upon your audience.
    Think about your own school district and tailor
    it to your own needs. Make it your own. Change
    the font size for your presentation needs, add
    local information. How much time do you have?
    What are the most essential questions or
    statements you would like to make? Think about
    what type of dialogue you would like to
    facilitate. Are there any local initiatives you
    would like to discuss using this data? How can
    it be connected to action planning or budgets?
    Are you presenting at an SU or local district
    site?
  • Less is more. Keep it focused. Cut out those
    areas of less importance for your presentation
    and keep those critical pieces. You can always
    choose to include more on your website or a
    handout.

2
Notes..
  • Look for the red font! Red font indicates a note
    from me to you, helpful advice, questions to
    consider, areas where you may want to do some
    tailoring.
  • Finally, if you have any questions or get stuck,
    please contact
  • Amy Cole at amy_at_amylcole.com
  • John Ferreira at jferrara_at_vdcmembers.org
  • Michael Hock at michael.hock_at_state.vt.us
  • or visit the VDC website at www.vermontdata.org

3
ltSchool Districtgt2006 NECAP Assessment Results
  • ltName of presenter(s)gt
  • ltPresentation dategt

4
Organization of this presentation
  • This presentation is divided into four sections
  • Introduction and background about NECAP and how a
    local assessment plan works with a quick overview
    of 2005 results.
  • More detailed results, how they are interpreted
    and how they connect to local programs.
  • Communication, action planning and next steps.
    How the results are presented to parents in a
    student report? Commonly asked questions. What
    do we do with the information now? What are our
    next steps?
  • QA

5
1. Introduction What is NECAP?
  • The New England Common Assessment Program is the
    result of a collaboration among New Hampshire,
    Rhode Island and Vermont to build a set of
    assessments for grades 3-8 in order to meet the
    requirements of No Child Left Behind.
  • NECAP assesses reading and math in grades 3-8 and
    writing in grades 5 and 8.
  • The NECAP was piloted in October 2004 then fully
    implemented for the first time in October 2005
    and again in October 2006.

6
What is NECAP?
  • NECAP replaces New Standards Reference Exam
    (Grades 4, 8 and 10) in the Vermont State
    Assessment and Accountability Plan.
  • Vermont continues to administer the Grade 2
    Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA).
  • A high school NECAP assessment will be
    administered in grade 11 officially for the first
    time in October 2007.
  • A Science NECAP will be administered in grades 5,
    8 and 11 officially for the first time in May
    2008.

7
What does NECAP measure?
NECAP test items are aligned to the Vermont Grade
Expectations and are designed to measure student
performance in the following strands.
  • Reading (grades 3-8)
  • Word ID/Vocabulary
  • Level of Reading Comprehension Initial
    Understanding and Analysis and Interpretation
  • Type of text Literary and Informational
  • Math (grades 3-8)
  • Number and Operations
  • Geometry and Measurement
  • Functions and Algebra
  • Data, Statistics and Probability
  • Writing (grades 5 and 8)
  • Structure of Language and Writing Conventions
  • Short Responses
  • Extended Response

8
How to use student data
  • Triangulation of state, local and classroom
    assessment

Classroom Performance and Assessment
Student performance - content and skills
State Assessments
Common Local Assessments
9
For example.
  • reading logs
  • literature circles
  • journals
  • reading screenings
  • running records

Student performance in Reading
Primary Observation Assessment (POA), Qualitative
Reading Inventory (QRI)
DRA, NECAP Reading Assessment
10
How to misuse data
  • By not looking at the data accurately. Ex Are
    they the same kids?
  • Taking small bits of data and drawing large
    assumptions. Look at the size of the group!
  • Using only state datawhat does your local and
    classroom data tell you? Triangulate,
    triangulate, triangulate!
  • Not looking at a long time period. Dont jump to
    conclusion after one year. Develop a set of
    questions and concerns. Then develop a plan to
    look at it carefully over time to see if your
    questions or concerns lead to any valid
    conclusions.
  • Not involving all of the right people in the
    discussion. It is critical that we find ways to
    support teachers in looking at and making sense
    of all of the available student assessment data.

11
Important Changes in NECAP this year
  • Out of level testing There are some students
    who have been evaluated as unable to test at
    their own grade level due to a disability. This
    tends to be approximately 2-3 of each districts
    students. In 2005 schools were permitted to test
    these students out of grade level (OTL) so that
    the students could still participate in NECAP in
    a meaningful way. Schools received two reports
    (1) all students who tested at grade level and
    (2) a separate report for students who tested out
    of grade level.

12
Important Changes in NECAP this year
  • What has changed? The US Department of Education
    required that students who were designated (OTL)
    now be included in the general public reports.
    This will mean that all school districts will now
    have an additional 2-3 of students in their
    average percentages that were not included in the
    general reports last year. It should be expected
    that in this first year the percent of students
    who fall in the substantially below level will
    increase between 2005 and 2006 as we transition
    between these two practices.

13
NECAP Test Design
  • NECAP Testing window
  • Three weeks in October
  • Grades 3-8 (Approximately 6 hours)
  • Three reading sections (approx. 1 hr. each)
  • Three math sections (approx. 1 hr. each)
  • Grades 5 and 8 (an approximate additional 2
    hours)
  • An additional two writing sections (approx. 1 hr.
    each)

14
NECAP Test Design
  • Multiple choice
  • Multiple-choice items are efficient for testing a
    broad array of content in a relatively short time
    span. (1 point)
  • Short answer
  • These open-ended items ask students to generate a
    short response to a question. (1 or 2 points)
  • Constructed response
  • This is a more complex item type that requires
    students to give a longer response to items
    related to a reading passage or solve multi-step
    mathematics problems. (4 points)
  • Extended-response writing prompts
  • These are topics or questions designed to prompt
    students to respond in writing. Students compose
    a response to the writing prompt. (12 points)

15
Quick Overview of 2006 Results
  • Suggestion Put a clean graph of just the of
    students meeting and exceeding standards for
    reading, writing and math.
  • How?
  • As a VDC member you can construct this graph
    using the PC Analyzer. However, this query will
    be included in the Shared Favorites under EDW
    Templates. You simply need to open it up and
    drag your own school into the query.

16
How 2006 Compare with 2005 Results?
  • Suggestion If you want to compare whole school
    scores from year to year then PLEASE dont forget
    to remind them about the changes in OTL and the
    mobility factor.
  • Simple way.Put a clean graph of just the of
    students meeting and exceeding standards for
    reading, writing and math between 2005 and 2006.
  • You may also want to show a more accurate
    comparison by providing data on only those
    students who were tested in both years.
  • Questions to consider Do you want to show
    scaled scores or percentages? of students in
    each proficiency level? of students at
    proficiency and above?
  • How?
  • As a VDC member you can construct this graph
    using the PC Analyzer. However, this query will
    be included in the Shared Favorites under EDW
    Templates. You simply need to open it up and
    drag your own school into the query.

17
What about cohorts?
  • Cohorts is a term which describes individual
    groups of students (by grade level, by NCLB
    categories, etc.) We can track groups of
    students over time or look for trends within one
    set time. (Ex how students of poverty perform
    in early grades or how one group of 3rd grade
    students perform the next year in 4th grade,
    etc.)
  • However, it is very important that we are looking
    at the same students in both scenarios.

18
Have we learned anything by looking at cohorts?
  • Suggestion.examine a cohort or student
    subcategory (poverty, ELL, students will
    disability, etc.) which is of particular
    interest in your district and show how NECAP can
    be used to track progress of these groups.
  • You could do a whole school comparison of a
    subcategory in 2005 and then 2006 or showing a
    table with of students meeting the standard
    moving up a grade level along the table.
    Caution! Be sure they are the same kids! As
    with looking at any group over time, be sure to
    take into account mobility and the changes in
    OTL. Also, please note that it is premature to
    draw any significant theories using only two
    years of data.
  • How?
  • As a VDC member you can construct this graph
    using the PC Analyzer. However, this query will
    be included in the Shared Favorites under EDW
    Templates. You simply need to open it up and
    drag your own school into the query. Caution!
    If you are going to build a query with specific
    grade levels, dont forget to pull the grade
    level over from the student section, not the
    organization section.

19
2. Detailed Results
  • The second part of this presentation will
  • provide detailed results in math, reading and
    writing
  • Provide more details about the test itself

20
Math Overview
  • The NECAP mathematics test at grades 3 and 4
  • 44 multiple-choice items,
  • 13 one-point short-answer items, and
  • 13 two-point short-answer items.
  • The NECAP mathematics tests at grades 5 through
    8
  • 41 multiple-choice items,
  • 9 one-point short-answer items,
  • 9 two-point short-answer items, and
  • 6 constructed response items.

21
Example Math Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Geometry and Measurement VT
Grade Expectation 7-2 Item type Multiple
Choice Points 1 Correct answer C
22
Example Math Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Function and Algebra VT Grade
Expectation 7-1 Item type Short
answer Points 2
23
Example Math Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Number and Operations VT Grade
Expectation 7-2
Item type Constructed Response Points 4
24
Local results in Math by Grade Levels
Suggestion.Insert graph here showing each grade
level for math. Horizontal or vertical
columns. For additional context you could
include the average of combined grades so that
you can see lower and higher averages per grade
level. You could do the same for the total VT
as well. How? As a VDC member you can
construct this graph using the PC Analyzer.
However, this query will be included in the
Shared Favorites under EDW Templates. You
simply need to open it up and drag your own
school into the query. Dont forget to pull the
grade level over from the student section,
not the organization section.
25
Local results in Math by Subcategories
  • Suggestion.Insert graph here showing school
    performance by subcategory, particularly if it is
    helpful in addressing any particular action plan
    item or initiative and evaluating the effect of
    these actions/programs.
  • How? If you want to use a graph, use the query
    from VDC shared favorites. If you want to show
    the table found on the Measured Progress report
    by following these steps
  • Go to the school district report where you can
    find your subcategories. This is a PDF file.
  • Make sure you are at 100 image (not 75 or 50.)
  • Find the table with subcategories.
  • Take a picture of it by touching the camera
    icon on your PDF tool bar then dragging a box
    around the image you would like to copy.
  • Go to this slide and paste it on.
  • Resize. Try to resize it to fit your needs. Be
    careful though! You can make it very fuzzy if
    you begin to change the image too much.
  • If you are tempted to compare subcategories
    from year to year please read the next slides
    cautions first!

26
Local results in Math Over Time
Suggestion. If you would like to compare
performance in the whole school or from one grade
level from year to year you can either make a
graph or copy an image from the new NECAP
report which does just that. CAUTION Please
remember that these are not the same students!
1) OTL students are included in the reports this
year and werent last year. (2) All schools
experience some mobility. How? There are
several ways you can do this. As a VDC member you
can easily run a query to include the students
who were actually tested in both years. This
will eliminate the OTL and those who moved in
after 2005 testing for the most accurate cohort
comparison.
27
What have we learned?
Students who fell in the lowest two proficiency
levels tended to score low on the short answer
and constructed response items. X of these
students were two math problems away from meeting
proficiency level. Several students were within
2 points of moving into the partially proficient
level (one or two raw item points). Several of
these students have IEPs or are ELL students.
28
What have we learned?
Students who fell in the top two proficiency
levels tended to show strength in expressing
answers on short answer and constructed response
items. X students were four points away from
Distinction (two problems or one constructed
response item).
29
Reading Overview
  • The NECAP reading test at all grades
  • 42 multiple-choice items and
  • 9 constructed response items
  • Literary passages
  • Modern narratives diary entries drama poetry
    biographies essays excerpts from novels short
    stories and traditional narratives such as
    fables, tall tales, myths, and folktales.
  • Informational passages
  • Factual texts often dealing with the areas of
    science and social studies.
  • Taken from sources such as newspapers, magazines,
    and excerpts from books and also include
    directions, manuals, or recipes.
  • Word identification and vocabulary skills
  • Tested, primarily through multiple-choice items,
    at each grade level.

30
Example Reading Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Informational/Analysis and
Interpretation VT Grade Expectation 7-8 Item
type Constructed Response Points 4
31
Example Reading Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Word ID/Vocabulary VT Grade
Expectation 7-2 Item type Multiple
Choice Points 1 Correct answer C
32
Local results in Reading by Grade Levels
Suggestion.Insert graph here showing each grade
level for math. Horizontal or vertical
columns. For additional context you could
include the average of combined grades so that
you can see lower and higher averages per grade
level. You could do the same for the total VT
as well. How? As a VDC member you can
construct this graph using the PC Analyzer.
However, this query will be included in the
Shared Favorites under EDW Templates. You
simply need to open it up and drag your own
school into the query. Dont forget to pull the
grade level over from the student section,
not the organization section.
33
Local results in Reading by Subcategories
  • Suggestion.Insert graph here showing school
    performance by subcategory, particularly if it is
    helpful in addressing any particular action plan
    item or initiative and evaluating the effect of
    these actions/programs.
  • How? If you want to use a graph, use the query
    from VDC shared favorites. If you want to show
    the table found on the Measured Progress report
    by following these steps
  • Go to the school district report where you can
    find your subcategories. This is a PDF file.
  • Make sure you are at 100 image (not 75 or 50.)
  • Find the table with subcategories.
  • Take a picture of it by touching the camera
    icon on your PDF tool bar then dragging a box
    around the image you would like to copy.
  • Go to this slide and paste it on.
  • Resize. Try to resize it to fit your needs. Be
    careful though! You can make it very fuzzy if
    you begin to change the image too much.
  • If you are tempted to compare subcategories
    from year to year please read the next slides
    cautions first!

34
Local results in Reading Over Time
Suggestion. If you would like to compare
performance in the whole school or from one grade
level from year to year you can either make a
graph or copy an image from the new NECAP
report which does just that. CAUTION Please
remember that these are not the same students!
1) OTL students are included in the reports this
year and werent last year. (2) All schools
experience some mobility. How? There are
several ways you can do this. As a VDC member you
can easily run a query to include the students
who were actually tested in both years. This
will eliminate the OTL and those who moved in
after 2005 testing for the most accurate cohort
comparison.
35
What have we learned?
Students who fell in the lowest two proficiency
levels tended to score low on the short answer
and constructed response items. X of these
students were two math problems away from meeting
proficiency level. Several students were within
2 points of moving into the partially proficient
level (one or two raw item points). Several of
these students have IEPs or are ELL students.
36
What have we learned?
Students who fell in the top two proficiency
levels tended to show strength in expressing
answers on short answer and constructed response
items. X students were four points away from
Distinction (two problems or one constructed
response item).
37
Writing Overview
  • NECAP assesses students writing skills directly
    through the use of writing prompts, or topics, to
    which students respond.
  • Structures and conventions of language are
    assessed through multiple-choice items and
    throughout the students writing.
  • The NECAP writing test at grade 5 included
  • 12 multiple-choice items,
  • 3 constructed response items,
  • 3 one-point short-answer items, and
  • one extended-response writing prompt.
  • Each of the constructed response items and the
    writing prompt addressed a different genre of
    writing.
  • Writing in Response to Literary Text
  • Writing in Response to Informational Text
  • Narratives
  • Informational Writing (Report/Procedure at grade
    5 and Persuasive at grade 8)

38
Writing Overview
  • The content standards in writing identify four
    major genres
  • Writing in Response to Literary Text
  • Writing in Response to Informational Text
  • Narratives
  • Informational Writing (Report/Procedure at grade
    5 and Persuasive at grade 8)
  • Each year, all four genres of writing are
    assessed in the writing portion of the NECAP
    test. In addition, structures and conventions of
    language are assessed through multiple-choice
    items and throughout the students writing.

39
Example Writing Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Short Responses VT Grade
Expectation 7-5 and 7-8 Item type Constructed
Response Depth of Knowledge 2 Points 4
40
Example Writing Tasks Grade 8
Content strand Structures of Language and
Writing Conventions VT Grade Expectation
7-9 Item type Multiple Choice Depth of
Knowledge 1 Points 1 Correct answer A
41
Local results in Writing by Grade Levels
Suggestion.Insert graph here showing each grade
level for math. Horizontal or vertical
columns. For additional context you could
include the average of combined grades so that
you can see lower and higher averages per grade
level. You could do the same for the total VT
as well. How? As a VDC member you can
construct this graph using the PC Analyzer.
However, this query will be included in the
Shared Favorites under EDW Templates. You
simply need to open it up and drag your own
school into the query. Dont forget to pull the
grade level over from the student section,
not the organization section.
42
Local results in Writing by Subcategories
  • Suggestion.Insert graph here showing school
    performance by subcategory, particularly if it is
    helpful in addressing any particular action plan
    item or initiative and evaluating the effect of
    these actions/programs.
  • How? If you want to use a graph, use the query
    from VDC shared favorites. If you want to show
    the table found on the Measured Progress report
    by following these steps
  • Go to the school district report where you can
    find your subcategories. This is a PDF file.
  • Make sure you are at 100 image (not 75 or 50.)
  • Find the table with subcategories.
  • Take a picture of it by touching the camera
    icon on your PDF tool bar then dragging a box
    around the image you would like to copy.
  • Go to this slide and paste it on.
  • Resize. Try to resize it to fit your needs. Be
    careful though! You can make it very fuzzy if
    you begin to change the image too much.
  • If you are tempted to compare subcategories
    from year to year please read the next slides
    cautions first!

43
Local results in Writing Over Time
Suggestion. If you would like to compare
performance in the whole school or from one grade
level from year to year you can either make a
graph or copy an image from the new NECAP
report which does just that. CAUTION Please
remember that these are not the same students!
1) OTL students are included in the reports this
year and werent last year. (2) All schools
experience some mobility. How? There are
several ways you can do this. As a VDC member you
can easily run a query to include the students
who were actually tested in both years. This
will eliminate the OTL and those who moved in
after 2005 testing for the most accurate cohort
comparison.
44
What have we learned?
Students who fell in the lowest two proficiency
levels tended to score low on the short answer
and constructed response items. X of these
students were two math problems away from meeting
proficiency level. Several students were within
2 points of moving into the partially proficient
level (one or two raw item points). Several of
these students have IEPs or are ELL students.
45
What have we learned?
Students who fell in the top two proficiency
levels tended to show strength in expressing
answers on short answer and constructed response
items. X students were four points away from
Distinction (two problems or one constructed
response item).
46
3. Communicating results and Taking Action
  • The Student Report
  • Commonly Asked Questions
  • Action Planning and Next Steps

47
How do I read the NECAP Student Report?
  • The NECAP Student Report is divided into three
    sections.
  • Students Achievement Level and Score
  • Students Achievement Level Compared to Other
    Students by School, District, and State
  • Students Performance in Content Area
    Subcategories

48
Student Report
49
Student Report
50
Student Report
51
How are we responding to this new data?
  • Providing training and support to our teachers
    with regards to how to support parents in
    understanding their childs results.
  • Participating in state-wide NECAP trainings.
  • Providing individual team and classroom student
    results in the hands of current teachers and
    teachers who taught the students the previous
    year.
  • Working with administrators in looking at
    school-wide and team-level disaggregated data
    such as gender, free and reduced lunch, ELL and
    students with disabilities.
  • Looking at students who fell into each
    proficiency level and determining whether these
    are students who are currently on some type of
    plan such as an IEP, 504, EST or other
    intervention plans.
  • Working as curriculum teams in looking at how our
    students performed on individual content strands
  • Comparing NECAP with local assessment data in
    order to draw conclusions regarding curriculum
    and instruction target areas.

52
How do we use it to evaluate programs?
  • Suggestionfocus on one or two initiatives and
    see if NECAP can provide any data to look
    critically at how those initiatives are working.

53
Commonly asked questions
  • Q I noticed that the percent of students who
    achieve the standard on the grade 2 DRA is about
    10 higher than the 3rd grade reading NECAP. Why
    is that?
  • A Quite simply, they are different assessments.
    The 10 trend is common across VT and should not
    be of significant concern. The DRA is a
    one-on-one assessment (narrow in focus and
    provides deeper information.) NECAP is a
    whole-group assessment which assesses more
    components of reading but with less depth. Both
    sets of scores are valid and inform our
    instruction differently. Teachers work together
    to look at what the two assessments and what
    they measure and then use the data accordingly to
    adjust instruction within their classes.

54
Commonly asked questions
  • Q Can the NECAP tell me if my child has
    progressed from one year to the next?
  • A Yes in that you can compare your childs
    scaled score (ex 440) to this years raw
    score (ex 540). The first digit (4) reflects
    the grade level assessed. If your childs score
    increases by about 100 you can assume that they
    progress about one grade level from the last
    assessment. Keep in mind that this assessment is
    not the only important measurement of growth.
    These are single snapshots of your child on one
    given day. In addition, not all students show
    their abilities well on assessments.

55
Commonly asked questions
  • Q Can we look at whole groups and whether or not
    they improved over time?
  • A Yes, if we look at the correct data. Simply
    looking at one 5th grade class as they move to
    6th grade does not take into consideration
    whether or not they were the same students. In
    2006 we know that additional students who were
    tested out of level will be included where they
    had not been previously included in the average
    score. Students also move from school to school.
    If your intent is to truly assess progress of
    groups, it is important you look at the students
    who were actually there for both tests!

56
Commonly asked questions
  • Q My child did not perform well on the
    geometry subtest of the math NECAP. What does
    that mean?
  • A It simply means that they did not perform on
    those items on this one state assessment. When
    you meet with your teacher at parent conferences,
    ask if there is any additional evidence from
    classroom work to suggest your child is needing
    extra support in this area. There are many ways
    to show if a child is meeting or not meeting a
    standard. Ask your classroom teacher to help you
    find out how they are doing in other settings.

57
Commonly asked questions
  • Q If we compare our scores to other school
    districts can we assess how well our students are
    performing overall?
  • A Yes and no. Again, NECAP is only one
    measurement. It is important to look at a
    variety of data to see how your school is
    performing, including other state assessment
    data, local assessment data, graduation rates,
    attendance rates, school and community
    demographics, etc. Also, keep in mind the issue
    of mobility. If students are moving in and out
    of your district they are likely doing the same
    in other districts. Districts may find it
    helpful to find comparable school districts
    and/or use the VT averages rather than simply
    looking at the neighboring school district.

58
What are our next steps?
  • Obviously these should be locally designed.
    Below are a few suggestions
  • Continue to look at individual, team and
    school-wide data to look for trends.
  • Triangulating local, state and classroom data and
    develop any recommendations towards individual or
    group level student intervention plans.
  • Examine existing resources towards providing
    interventions for students who are below
    proficiency levels.
  • Prioritize any target improvement areas and
    incorporate our findings into the new CSSU action
    plan and local action plans.
  • Take a look at the calendar and build in time for
    teachers to work together in looking at data and
    working on identified target areas.

59
4. QA
Additional information is available at the VT
Department of Education website
www.state.vt.us/educ
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com