NIH Resubmissions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

NIH Resubmissions

Description:

If you are changing to include multiple PIs-mention the new team members here. ... If the specific line of investigation was not recommended for approval ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Mar5154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NIH Resubmissions


1
  • Grants.gov Training for NIH Resubmissions
    Renewals

2
Form SF 424 (RR)Box 1-Type of Submission
3
Form SF 424 (RR)Box 4- Federal Identifier
  • Need Federal Identifier of prior grant or
    application (i.e. CA123456)
  • Do NOT put CA-123-456-no dashes
  • Do put R01 NOT RO1-use the number 0 not the
    letter O.

4
Box 8-Type of Application
5
Box 8- Check Resubmissions
  • For revised or amended applications
  • Up to 2 tries are allowed
  • No longer restricted to 2 yr time frame
  • Must have Summary Statement from previous review.
  • Acceptance of a resubmission application
    automatically withdraws the prior version as 2
    versions cannot be pending at the same time.

6
Resubmissions Continued
  • Must Include
  • Introduction
  • READ to find the page limit-may be just 1 or
    sometimes can be more.
  • Summarize substantial additions, deletions,
    changes.
  • Must include response to issues raised in
    Summary Statement
  • If you are changing to include multiple
    PIs-mention the new team members here.

7
Upload it here
8
Resubmissions Continued
  • Research Plan of Resubmission
  • Must include substantial changes in each section.
  • Identify changes in each section of the research
    plan by bracketing or indenting unless the
    majority of your text represents change. In this
    case, no indentation or bracketing is required.
  • These changes should also be outlined in the
    introduction.
  • Do NOT underline or shade changes.

9
Resubmissions Continued
4-Preliminary Studies/ Progress report- Should
incorporate any work done since prior version
was submitted
10
14-Multiple PI Leadership Plan-If Applicable
11
Leadership Plan Must Include
  • Rationale for choosing multiple PD/PI.
  • Governance organizational structure.
  • Communication plans.
  • Process for decision making on scientific
    direction.
  • Procedures for resolving conflicts.
  • Delineate roles for admin, technical scientific
    responsibilities.

12
Continued
  • If budget allocation is planned-distribution of
    resources to individual PD/PIs should be
    deliniated.
  • If awarded, this will show as a footnote in the
    NOGA.
  • Drexel is not, however, obligated to establish a
    separate linked fund.

13
If you are no longer going to be the Contact
PI-fill out Checklist
14
Identical Applications or those with only minor
changes will NOT be accepted for review. NIH
15
Box 8-Check Renewals
  • For competing continuations

16
Box 8-NEVER check Continuation
  • Do not use
  • May be used in the future for Progress Reports

17
Box 8-Check Revision
  • Administrative Supplement
  • Competing Supplement

18
Revision-Administrative Supplement
  • At this time-NOT done via grants.gov
  • Must be done before grant expires
  • Consult in advance with designated Grants
    Management Officer and Program Official
  • Submit a request in writing to the Institute or
    Center (Not Center for Scientific Review) signed
    by the PI and ORCA.
  • Describe the need for addl funding and the
    category of costs.
  • Point out what will NOT be accomplished if the
    request is denied.

19
Revision-Competing Supplement
  • Use to request support for a significant
    expansion of a projects scope.
  • NOT to restore awards to the full Scientific
    Review Group recommended level if it was reduced
    by the funding agency.
  • Do NOT submit until the original application is
    awarded.
  • Cannot extend beyond the term of the current
    award period.

20
Revision-Competing Supplement-Contd
  • 1 page introduction to describe nature of the
    supplement how it will influence specific aims
    research design of the current grant.
  • Covert to PDF and upload in PHS 398-Research Plan
  • Section 2.1 Introduction to Application.

21
(No Transcript)
22
Revision-Competing Supplement-Contd
  • The body of the application should contain
    sufficient information from the original grant to
    allow evaluation of proposed supplement in
    relation to the original goals.
  • If the specific line of investigation was not
    recommended for approval originally-you must
    address issues from prior Summary Statement
    with clear revisions summarized in the
    introduction.

23
Any budget changes for the remainder of the
project period of the current grant.
24
Should be discussed in a PDF Budget Justification
uploaded in K.
25
In Conclusion
  • Resubmission-Revised or amended applications
  • Renewal-Competing Continuations
  • Continuation-Do NOT use
  • Revision-Competing Supplement
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com