How to get it right or very nearly right the first time By John Eargle - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

How to get it right or very nearly right the first time By John Eargle

Description:

2-track jazz recordings: Arrange players, left to right, to match the stereo ... Modern halls usually have variable acoustics; drapes can be deployed to deaden ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:91
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: johne77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How to get it right or very nearly right the first time By John Eargle


1
How to get it right - or very nearly right- the
first timeBy John Eargle
  • A close look at stereo and surround recording in
    both live and studio settings

2
2-track jazz recordings
  • Arrange players, left to right, to match the
    stereo sound stage
  • Lay out console faders the same way
  • This gives you intuitive visual cues and
    consistent leakage between panned images
  • Heres an example

3
Live to 2-track jazztypical studio setup and
target sound stage
4
2-track chamber music
  • When the players agree to it, have them depart
    from the usual concert setup
  • Arrange them in circular fashion so they can see
    each other, and mic them accordingly
  • This gives both engineer and producer greater
    control for on-the-fly balance changes

5
Classical example 1
6
Classical example 2
7
Classical large forms
  • When a conductor is present, there are fewer
    opportunities to make fundamental changes
  • Some left-right/fore-aft adjustments can easily
    be made in the orchestra
  • The most likely major change that can be made is
    when chorus and soloists are involved
  • Here is a good example

8
Put chorus behind the conductor
9
This has the following advantages
  • Gets the chorus away from the back of the
    orchestra, where percussion and brass can leak
    into the chorus mics
  • Lets the chorus communicate directly with the
    live ambience of the hall, as opposed to the dry
    ambience of up-stage

10
Live classical recording of orchestras
  • This has become common in recent years because of
    escalating costs
  • Conductors, players and soloists almost always
    prefer it
  • There are certain musical advantages (i.e.,
    performance spontaneity and avoidance of
    over-exertion of players)

11
What are the disadvantages?
  • Audience noises
  • Acoustical matching (4 concerts are the norm,
    with a finishing session scheduled after the
    audience has left the last concert)

12
We normally handle these by
  • Having orchestra management personnel TELL the
    audience to be quiet (beepers, watches, cell
    phones, rustling programs and coughs are all
    problems)
  • No applause until the conductor has lowered the
    baton
  • Coming up with a strategy for matching the sonic
    signature between the hall, empty and occupied

13
What are these strategies?
  • Modern halls usually have variable acoustics
    drapes can be deployed to deaden the room when
    the audience leaves
  • Some halls have adjustable reverber- tion for
    making a good acoustical match between full and
    empty halls
  • Have a good reverberation unit on hand to make up
    the differences

14
How well can recordings be matched?
  • Two examples
  • Full-to-empty house (DSO Mahler 2 McDermott
    Hall)
  • Same house, from 1987 to 2001(OSO Feste Romane
    trumpet insert Schnitzer Hall)

15
Session efficiency
  • Keep a detailed log of all professional recording
    assignments/activities
  • Log all pertinent console settings, mic models,
    channel/pan assignments, EQ, reverb send/receive
    settings, calibration values, on-stage mic
    positions, piano serial numbers, etc.
  • Dont forget to list all pertinent personnel,
    including recording, artistic and general
    support technical credits are important

16
How to reduce the time required for a sound check
  • In todays commercial world you should be up and
    running in no more than 5 minutes after down-beat
  • The industry goal is to get 10 minutes of usable
    recording for each scheduled hour of studio time
    (each studio hour includes 20 minutes break time)
  • You must have a template in mind for each new
    project
  • These templates define a basic microphone array
    which you determine to be best suited for the
    project, based largely on your experience
  • Lets look at some of these

17
Microphone array hierarchy
  • Main arrays determine the basic perspective on
    the ensemble
  • Spot mics are used for internal highlighting
    (delay often required)
  • House mics are used to define, as needed, the
    overall room signature
  • Remember, we are still talking about
    direct-to-stereo recording

18
The aim is to provide stereo image specificity
and spatiality in the recording
  • Specificity refers to hearing instruments where
    they are placed on the stage
  • Spatiality implies that there is a sense of
    location, large or small, in which these
    instruments are played
  • This is a tall order for only two loudspeakers in
    the listening space

19
Basic microphone layout for DSO recording of
American in Paris
20
Examples of basic orchestral perspectives
  • ORTF pair (cards at 7-inches splayed at
    110-degrees)
  • Flanking omnis alone (spaced 1/3 stage width
    about the center line)
  • House mics alone (cards at 24 facing back)
  • ORTF plus flanks
  • ORTF plus flanks and house
  • The above 3 pairs plus internal spot mics -- the
    final stereo mix

21
Why use spot mics
  • Spot mics are used
  • To correct fore-aft balances in the orchestra
  • To correct balances for weak instruments (e. g.,
    harp, celesta)
  • To correct for spectral imbalances (e. g.,
    basses)
  • To add presence (primarily percussion and back of
    orchestra)
  • Delay of spot mics always correct, but not
    always necessary
  • Always pan spot mics to their natural positions
    in the basic stereo pickup
  • Roll off LF slightly

22
Approximate guidelines for delaying spot mics
23
Other mic arrays
  • Spaced omnis (good sense of space slightly
    compromised sense of specificity mainstay of the
    early US stereo catalog)
  • Decca tree flanks (rich spatial cues hallmark
    of Decca and EMI recording, even today)
  • Heads, baffles, etc. flanks (largely
    experimental)

24
Spaced omnis
  • These tend to emphasize spatiality, largely
    through in increase in time cues and pickup of
    reverberation
  • Number depends on width of ensemble
  • Separation of about 12 is the maximum

25
Excellent for organ and large choruses
  • To get a broad sound front with emphasis on
    diffuseness, not image specificity
  • To produce a big sound suggesting more
    performers than are actually present
  • Example of organ pickup
  • Examples of chorus pickup
  • 2 spaced omnis Piccolo Hear us, O Lord
  • 3 spaced omnis Mahler Symphony 2
  • 4 spaced omnis Lauridsen O Magnum Mysterium

26
Other microphone arrays
  • Decca tree makes use of Neumann M50 microphones
  • These are omni at LF, increasing in both output
    and forward directivity at HF
  • A flanking pair com-plements the main array

27
Omnis and a pair of subcardioids
  • Flanking omnis as before
  • Splayed separated subcards at center
  • Imaging rich in time cues
  • Excellent in not-too-live halls

28
Franssens data on stereo localization
29
The signal path microphones
  • Salient specs sensitivity noise floor
    impedance 0.5 THD level pattern integrity
    axial response and limits
  • How good can a microphone be?
  • Consider the BK 4179 noise floor -2 dB(A)
    however,max level is about 102 dB LP,and
    frequency response is erratic above about 10 kHz.
    Polar response is that of a 1-inch diaphragm

30
The eternal triangle
  • Dynamic range, bandwidth, and polar response. Any
    improvement in one of these attributes comes with
    a compromise in one or both of the others
  • Dynamic range Make diaphragm larger (compromises
    polar response) Increase spacing and reduce
    tension (compromises frequency response)
  • Polar response Make diaphragm smaller (reduces
    output level and increases noise)
  • Bandwidth Make diaphragm stiffer (reduces output
    and decreases dynamic range)

31
The signal path consoles vs. stand-alone preamps
  • Phantom powering options
  • Impedance adjusting
  • Maximum input capability
  • Noise floor
  • Common mode rejection
  • Padding/gain adjustment

32
The signal path line level
  • Keep as simple as possible
  • Output busses vs. direct outs aux outs
  • EQ capability
  • Monitoring flexibility (line out 2 machines for
    stereo what about surround?)
  • Communications interface with stage and conductor

33
The signal path recorders
  • Metering setting reference level (typically,
    -14 to -20 dBFS)
  • Monitoring all tracks? How often?
  • Accurate note taking log sheets
  • How many operators are needed?
  • The producer should be given a set of DATs and
    complete log indicating PNOs, start/end times and
    score locations

34
Metering confusion
  • The various PPMs are all electronic and have very
    fast attack time (10 ms) and slow recovery time
    (3 seconds)
  • The VU meter typically has 0.3 second attack and
    recovery times
  • In this modern era we need digital meters

35
Audio monitoring
  • Loudspeakers vs. headphones
  • (producer and engineer should agree beforehand)
  • Nearfield vs. large loudspeakers
  • (You rarely have room for large loudspeakers)
  • Monitoring levels
  • (85 - 90 dB maximum is recommended)
  • How to calibrate monitor levels
  • (a set dBFS level a set LP)

36
What can go wrong? The following things have
actually happened to me
  • On-stage video monitor showing a mirror image of
    what was being monitored over loudspeakers. A
    noisy mic developed -- and guess what I did!
  • Noisy microphone due to improper seating of XLR
    cable at microphone
  • RF noise (not present during morning/afternoon
    sessions but evident in the evening)
  • Organ solenoids inducing clicks in mic lines
  • Problems with installed house mic wiring (noise,
    polarity, mislabeling) Check carefully before
    using!!

37
Digital timeline I
  • Soundstream (1976)
  • 14 bits at 32 kHz
  • Eventually 16 bits at 50 kHz
  • Stereo recording segments 20 minutes
  • Three editing centers worldwide - a real
    bottleneck

38
Digital timeline II
  • Early 80s JVC and Sony U-matic models plus
    editing systems
  • SPDF and AES-EBU standards
  • 3M and Mitsubishi reel-to-reel
  • DAT machines
  • 3rd party converters
  • Evolution of DASH and Pro-digi standards

39
Digital timeline III
  • Rise of DAWs and interface standards
  • Rise of DSP and internet based tech
  • Rise of tape based MDMs bit-splitting
  • Rise of disc based MDMs
  • Eventual relegation of reel digital recorders to
    dinosaur status?
  • Multitrack analog recorders may outlive us all

40
Surround sound consumer media
  • Dolby AC-3 on DVD-V
  • DTS encoded Redbook standard CDs (with decoder)

41
New consumer media
  • DVD-A versus SACD,or, PCM versus DSD
  • PCM sample rate/bit depth related
  • Signal is quantized at each sample sinx/x filter
    reconstructs the signal exactly, if it is below
    the Nyquist rate. Noise shaping improves
    resolution at low signal levels
  • Easy access to EQ and 3rd-party DSP equipment
  • DSD 1-bit/high sample rate
  • Signal is defined as the moving average of many
    1-bit approximations. Noise shaping essential for
    system operation
  • Access to EQ by way of PCM chain used only when
    necessary

42
Surround sound rationale
  • Stereo provides
  • image specificity at the sweet spot
  • conveys a sense of spatiality
  • Surround sound
  • frees the listener from the sweet spot
  • adds a new dimension of envelopment
  • Use more channels if
  • More image specificity is needed, or
  • Larger audience area is required

43
Surround mic techniques
  • The Soundfield microphone samples air pressure
    and particle velocity in 3 dimensions
  • These four elements can synthesize first-order
    cardioids aimed in any direction
  • These directions normally correspond to the
    locations of loudspeakers in the listening space

44
A seven microphone array
  • Presented at 2000 AES Convention, LA
  • Loudspeaker locations should match mic angles,
    but normal 5.1 performance is quite good, with
    vertical signals summed and fed to the 5
    loudspeakers at reduced level

45
Schoeps KFM 360 array
  • The array, as seen from above, consists of both
    front and back pairs of MS microphones
  • Patterns, as shown, can be chosen differently for
    front and back
  • A front-center channel can be derived from the
    front L/R pair
  • Control unit provides additional processing,
    including delay of back channels

46
The SPL (Sound Performance Lab) array
  • Telescoping arms can be adjusted
  • Microphones can be rotated and patterns adjusted
  • Note resemblance to Decca tree

47
Frontal arrays I
  • These are 3-channel arrays that optimize frontal
    pickup
  • Goal is to minimize double phantom images
  • Used in conjunction with a back pair of
    microphones

48
Frontal array II
  • Proposed, but not yet designed
  • Will provide 15 dB isolation between A and E
  • Polar equation r (.5 .5cosq)(cosq)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com