The Controversy of the Phylogyeny of Corbiculate Bees and what could cause it' - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

The Controversy of the Phylogyeny of Corbiculate Bees and what could cause it'

Description:

Monophyletic group of Long-tongued bees. Comprised of 4 monophyletic extant tribes ... Both Noll's data and Serrao's data support the single origin of eusocial bees ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: mbi7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Controversy of the Phylogyeny of Corbiculate Bees and what could cause it'


1
The Controversy of the Phylogyeny of Corbiculate
Beesand what could cause it.
  • Lisa Booth

2
Outline
  • Background
  • About Corbiculate Bees
  • Behavioral Phylogeny
  • Morphological Phylogeny
  • Molecular Phylogeny
  • Methods and Results
  • Alignment
  • Outgroup
  • Gene
  • Conclusions

3
Corbiculate Bees Why are they studied?
  • Include economically important species
  • Form complex eusocial societies

4
Corbiculate Bees What are they?
  • Family Apidae
  • Subfamily Apinae
  • Monophyletic group of Long-tongued bees
  • Comprised of 4 monophyletic extant tribes
  • Euglossini Orchid bee
  • Bombini Bumble bee
  • Apini Honey bee
  • Meliponini Stingless bee

5
Euglossini Orchid bee
  • Pollinate orchids by collecting chemicals on
    their legs
  • Do not possess eusocial behavior
  • Most are solitary

www.ufv.br/dbg/bee/euglossa.htm
6
Bombini Bumble bee
  • Important for crop and wildflower pollination
  • Are social
  • Form small colonies

www.sankey.ws/bombini.jpg
www.malawicichlidhomepage.com/macro_nature/
7
Apini Honey bee
www.durhamsbeefarm.com/photobee.htm
  • Only 6-11 species
  • Developed social behavior and structure 30
    million years ago
  • Maintain the same society today
  • Highly eusocial

www.sphoto.com/medium/wkbeecells76.jpg
8
Meliponini Stingless bee
www.ecuador-images.net/insect-bee18.jpg
  • Bite, but do not sting
  • Some produce honey, but not enough to harvest in
    most cases
  • Are highly eusocial

encarta.msn.com/.../Stingless_Bee_in_Amber.html
9
The Behavioral Phylogeny
  • Nolls Research
  • 42 Behavioral characteristics
  • Characters are based on
  • Nest construction
  • Food storage
  • Worker reproduction
  • Female-female interaction
  • Food provisioning

10
The Behavioral Phylogeny
Orchid
Bumble
Honey
Stingless
11
The Behavioral Phylogeny
  • Characters that separate the bumble bees from the
    stingless bees.
  • 6 Hygienic Habits
  • 13 Brood Cell Construction
  • 16 Brood Cell Construction
  • 18 Cell Construction and Oviposition
  • 20 Cell Provisioning
  • 24 Brood Food Origin
  • 28 Foraging Behavior
  • 29 Division of Non-reproductive behavior
  • 30 Food exchange among adults
  • 31 Nectar exchange among the individuals before
    being stored
  • 36 Colony foundation
  • 37 Queen foraging
  • 40 Dominant female or queen disappearance
  • 41 Morphological differences between castes

12
The Morphological Phylogeny
  • Serraos Research
  • Proventricular structure
  • Widened Apex
  • Triangular Apex
  • Spine-like hairs
  • Long columnar folds

13
The Morphological Phylogeny
Stingless
Honey
Bumble
Orchid
14
The Molecular Phylogeny
  • Camerons research
  • Used Molecular data from 4 genes
  • Nuclear DNA
  • 28S
  • Opsin
  • Mitochondrial DNA
  • 16S
  • Cytochrome b

15
The Molecular Phylogeny
Honey
Orchid
Bumble
Stingless
16
The Molecular Phylogeny
Orchid
Bumble
Stingless
Honey
17
The Molecular Phylogeny
Honey
Orchid
Bumble
Stingless
18
The Molecular Phylogeny
Honey
Bumble
Stingless
Orchid
19
The Molecular Phylogeny
Honey
Orchid
Bumble
Stingless
20
Controversy
  • Both Nolls data and Serraos data support the
    single origin of eusocial bees
  • Camerons data supports the dual origin of
    eusocial bees

www.entomology.cornell.edu
21
Methods Repeat Nolls Analysis
  • Copy data matrix from Nolls paper into a NEXUS
    format
  • Use PAUP 4.0 beta for a Parsimony analysis
  • Use PAUP 4.0 beta to find Bootstrap values
  • Looked at each character individually

22
Results Behavioral Analysis
23
Results Behavioral Analysis
  • Single Origin Characteristics
  • 4 Nest Coating
  • 6 Hygienic Habits
  • 9 Cell Walls
  • 10 Brood Cell Architecture
  • 13 Brood Cell Construction
  • 16 Brood Cell Construction
  • 18 Cell Construction and ovipositition
  • 20 Cell Provisioning
  • 24 Brood Food Origin
  • 28 Foraging Behavior
  • 29 Division of Nonreproductive behavior
  • 30 Food exchange among adults
  • 31 Nectar exchange among the individuals before
    being stored
  • 40 Dominant female or queen disappearance
  • 41 Morphological differences between castes
  • Dual Origin Characteristics
  • 7 Wax envelope covering the brood area
  • 8 Materials employed in cell construction
  • 12 Reuse of cells or space where larvae are
    reared
  • 25 Brood food composition
  • 27 Food storage
  • 35 Removal of cell walls after cocoon spinning
  • 38 Social regulation

24
Methods Repeat Camerons Analysis
  • Found Camerons aligned data on-line
  • Realigned data using ClustalX
  • Gap penalty of 10/0.05
  • Aligned Ingroup species first
  • Aligned Outgroup sequences to the Ingroup
  • Used PAUP 4.0 beta for Parsimony and Likelihood
    analyses
  • Used Mr. Bayes for a Bayesian analysis

25
Results Repeat Camerons Analysis
Bumble
Stingless
Orchid
Honey
28S
26
Results Repeat Camerons Analysis
Honey
Bumble
Orchid
Opsin
Stingless
27
Results Repeat Camerons Analysis
Bumble
Orchid
Honey
Stingless
16S
28
Results Repeat Camerons Analysis
Honey
Orchid
Bumble
Cytochrome b
Stingless
29
Results Repeat Camerons Analysis
Honey
Orchid
Bumble
Concatenated
Stingless
30
Methods Look at another gene
  • Found a new gene on GenBank, Elongation Factor
    1-alpha (nuclear)
  • Aligned DNA sequences with ClustalX
  • Gap penalty of 10/0.05
  • Aligned Ingroup first
  • Aligned Outgroup sequences to Ingroup
  • Used PAUP for Parsimony and Likelihood analyses
  • Used Mr. Bayes for a Bayesian analysis

31
Results Look at new gene
Bumble
Stingless
Honey
Elongation Factor
Orchid
32
Methods Investigate Outgroups
  • Redefined the Outgroup using Camerons outgroup
    species
  • Melissodes
  • Centris
  • Anthophora
  • Habropoda
  • Xylocopa
  • Found new outgroup species for the Cytochrome b
    and Elongation Factor genes
  • Allodape
  • Braunsapis
  • Ceratina

33
Results Investigate Outgroups (Parsimony
Trees)
34
Results Investigate Outgroups (Likelihood
Trees)
35
Results Investigate Outgroups (Bayesian Trees)
36
Conclusions Alignment
  • Not able to repeat Camerons alignment for all
    genes.
  • Calls into question Camerons alignments
  • Alignment does affect the tree
  • Concatenated Tree
  • 16S Tree

37
Conclusions Gene Choice
  • The different genes do not agree.
  • 28S and 16S have similar tree topologies of
    (AE)(BM).
  • Both are ribosomal non-coding
  • Opsin and Cytochrome b have similar tree
    topologies of A(E(BM)).
  • Both are genes for enzymes
  • EF has a topology of (AE)(BM).
  • Enzyme gene but does not match other enzyme genes.

38
Conclusions Outgroups
  • Outgroup choice is very important
  • Xylocopa and Centris seem to affect the tree the
    most
  • Braunsapis, Allodape and Ceratina seem to be good
    outgroups, but I wasnt able to find much data to
    test them fully
  • Camerons outgroups didnt group together, they
    mixed with the ingroup which makes them a poor
    outgroup

39
Conclusions Model of Analysis
  • Slight differences between the different tree
    options (parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian)
  • 16S and Opsin
  • were the most
  • sensitive to
  • the Model of
  • Analysis

40
Conclusions Controversy
  • Not an easily solved problem
  • Based on majority it seems that the most likely
    topology is A(E(BM)).
  • The Red blocks in the tables
  • Least sensitive to all the variants
  • Alignment
  • Gene
  • Outgroup

41
Acknowledgements
  • Thanks to Dennis Pearl and John Wenzel for all
    their suggestions and help.
  • Thanks also to Jeff Pan for his help with
    computer programs.

42
References
  • Danforth, B.N., J. Fang, S. Sipes, S.G. Brady
    E. Almeida (2004). Phylogeny and molecular
    systematics of bees (Hymenoptera Apidea).
    Cornell University, Ithaca, NY http//www.entomolo
    gy.cornell.edu/BeePhylogeny/
  • "Euglossini." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
    20 Jun 2006, 2338 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation,
    Inc. 16 Aug 2006 lthttp//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.
    php?titleEuglossinioldid59714591gt.
  • "Bumblebee." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 5
    Aug 2006, 0719 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
    16 Aug 2006 lthttp//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t
    itleBumblebeeoldid67786525gt.
  • "Honeybee." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. 16
    Aug 2006, 0337 UTC. Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.
    16 Aug 2006 lthttp//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?t
    itleHoneybeeoldid69944973gt.
  • "Stingless bee." Wikipedia, The Free
    Encyclopedia. 24 Jul 2006, 1415 UTC. Wikimedia
    Foundation, Inc. 16 Aug 2006 lthttp//en.wikipedia.
    org/w/index.php?titleStingless_beeoldid65555172
    gt.
  • Noll, Fernando B. "Behavioral Phylogeny of
    Corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera Apinae), with
    Special Reference to Social Behavior." Cladistics
    18 (2002) 137-153.
  • Winston, Mark L. and Charles D. Michener. "Dual
    origin of highly social behavior among bees."
    Proc. National Academy of Science 74.3 (Mar
    1977) 1135-1137.
  • Cameron, Sydney A. and Patrick Mardulyn.
    "Multiple Molecular Data Sets Suggest Independent
    Origins of Highly Eusocial Behavior in Bees
    (HymenopteraApinae)." Systematic Biology 50.2
    (Apr 2001) 194-214.
  • Serrao, J.E. A comparative study of the
    proventricular structure in corbiculate apinae
    (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Micron 32 (2001)
    379-385.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com