Corporate Governance and Sustainable Value Creation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

Corporate Governance and Sustainable Value Creation

Description:

Ex: executive compensation disclosure requirements. 6. The ... Executive compensation is not only scrutinized by outsiders impact within the company as well ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: beth150
Learn more at: http://view.fdu.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Corporate Governance and Sustainable Value Creation


1
Corporate Governance and Sustainable Value
Creation
  • Institute for Sustainable Enterprise
  • April 21, 2006
  • Beth Young, The Corporate Library

2
What is Corporate Governance?
  • System of assigning rights and responsibilities
    to participants in the corporate enterprise
  • Narrow view shareholders, management and the
    board are participants
  • Broad view all of the above plus employees,
    suppliers, creditors, customers and/or communities

3
Focus on Process
  • Corporate governance focuses on the identity of
    the decision maker, the available information and
    the mechanisms available to redress bad decisions
  • Examples
  • Requirements that independent directors make
    certain decisions
  • Shareholders rights to elect directors
  • Requirements that shareholders approve
    equity-based compensation plans

4
Focus on Process
  • Why does corporate governance focus almost
    exclusively on process?
  • Belief by policy makers that
  • The right process will more often than not lead
    to the best outcome
  • Dictating substantive outcomes is unwise and
    inefficient
  • The marketsmost of all, the ability of
    shareholders to sell their stockwill backstop
    corporate governance rules and discipline
    decision makers.

5
Process Affects Substantive Outcomes
  • The identity of the decision maker matters
    because of differences in incentives, culture,
    time horizons, conflicts of interest and other
    factors
  • The quantity and quality of information provided
    to the decision maker shapes the ultimate
    decision
  • Ex executive compensation disclosure
    requirements

6
The Role of Transparency
  • Transparency is a necessary but not sufficient
    condition for influencing behavior
  • Adequate information allows decision makers to be
    held accountable
  • The process of disclosure itself can change
    behavior and the locus of decision making around
    it
  • Ex risk management

7
Convergence of Governance and Corporate
Responsibility
  • Until recently, corporate governance and activism
    and corporate responsibility activism were very
    separate
  • Increasingly, the two are converging
  • Governance activists see corporate social
    behavior as a window into business risk, strategy
    and prospects (Ex CII, governance raters)
  • Social activists see governance as a way to
    strengthen outside influences and encourage
    optimal decision making processes (Ex campaign
    ExxonMobil, Investor Network on Climate Risk)

8
Accountability
  • I promise you, we will never again risk Enrons
    credibility in business ventures without first
    making sure we thoroughly understand the risks.
    Ken Lay, 1987
  • One cannot say that the checks and balances
    against excessive power within the old WorldCom
    didnt work adequately. Rather, the sad fact is
    that there were no checks and balances. Breeden
    Report
  • Accountability means enforcing decision makers
    responsibility to act in the best interests of
    the corporation.
  • Who gets held accountable and by whom?

9
Best Interests of the Corporation
  • What does this phrase mean?
  • Shareholder primacy norm
  • Real-life practice (Ex Time Inc., constituency
    statutes)
  • Time horizon
  • The problem of measurement/quantification
  • Who decides what it means?
  • The board of directorsexercising oversight power
  • Shareholdersmaking voting decisions
  • Courtsdeciding whether directors or officers
    have acted improperly

10
Management Accountability
  • The board holds management accountable by
  • Hiring and firing
  • Compensating
  • Overseeing financial reporting
  • Participating in/overseeing strategy
  • How do/should directors differ from managers?
  • Barriers to board effectiveness in promoting
    long-term approach to value creation (Ex
    Coca-Cola director compn, director nomination
    processes, succession planning)

11
Board Accountability
  • Shareholders hold the board accountable by
  • Dialogue/public criticism
  • Electing/removing directors (Ex Marsh
    McLennan)
  • Voting on major transactions
  • Voting on non-binding shareholder proposal
  • Suing for breach of fiduciary duty

12
Shareholders
  • Can shareholders effectively promote
    sustainability and long-term value creation?
  • Patient long-term capital pension funds,
    foundations and endowments
  • Investors with shorter-term liabilities
  • Incentives within asset management firms (Ex
    HP/Compaq and Deutsche Bank)
  • Quantification and tradeoffs
  • Fiduciary duties and responsible ownership
  • The shareholder may be innocent in fact, but
    socially he cannot be held innocent. Justice
    Louis Brandeis

13
Executive Pay
  • Executive compensation tests the ability of
    boards to integrate strategic planning and
    incentives, hold management accountable and
    uphold commitments to transparency.
  • In judging whether Corporate America is serious
    about reforming itself, CEO pay remains the acid
    test. To date, the results arent encouraging.
    Warren Buffett (2004)

14
Executive Pay and Sustainability
  • Skyrocketing executive pay is representative of
    growing income inequality
  • In 1980, the average CEO made 80 times the
    average workers salary by 2004, that multiple
    had risen to 431.
  • Retirement security while workers defined
    benefit plans are frozen or terminated,
    executives pensions grow
  • Pfizers McKinnell 6,518,459/yr.
  • ExxonMobils Raymond 6,500,000/yr
  • ATTs Whitacre 5,494,107/yr.

15
Executive Pay and Incentives
  • Corporate governances narrow model of human
    behavior I dont get out of bed for less than
    10,000 a day. Supermodel Linda Evangelista
  • What does executive pay incentivize?
  • Difficult to tell how incentive pay works
  • Almost impossible to tell how compensation serves
    strategic goals
  • Little use of non-financial benchmarksthose that
    are used are often fallbacks to provide
    compensation when financial criteria are not met
  • Use of market-based criteria duplicates equity
    compensations incentives

16
Equity-Based Compensation
  • Pay for performance and alignment with
    shareholdershas this idea held up?
  • What have we learned about options?
  • Encourage riskier behavior
  • No downside
  • Executives value them less than shareholders
    think they cost
  • Link to accounting fraud, managerial opportunism

17
Internal Pay Equity
  • Executive compensation is not only scrutinized by
    outsidersimpact within the company as well
  • Becomes part of corporate culturestudies show at
    companies with overpaid CEOs, other c-suite
    executives are usually overpaid as well
  • Shared sacrifice and executive pay (Ex AMR,
    Delta, Delphi)

18
Ownership Demographics and Corporate Governance
  • Range of ownership structures and demographics
  • The role of passive investment strategies out to
    lunch or the ultimate long-term investors?
  • Empirical evidence on ownership and monitoring
  • Employee ownership

19
Conclusions
  • Responsible corporate governance can be a tool to
    promote sustainable business practices, but
    reforms are necessary at the management, board
    and shareholder levels.
  • Levers on the shareholder side include
  • Organizing beneficial owners
  • Strengthening accountability mechanisms
  • Continuing to promote transparency
  • Taking incentives seriously
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com