Modalities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Modalities

Description:

Students will have the guidelines for safe and appropriate application of the ... Carrie Sussman (1998) stated that the lack of well designed clinical trials for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:614
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: alli53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modalities


1
Modalities Wound Care
  • by
  • Vince Lepak, PT, MPH, CWS

2
Objective
  • Students will have the guidelines for safe and
    appropriate application of the following
    modalities to promote wound healing
  • Hydrotherapy
  • Ultrasound
  • Electrical Stimulation
  • Hyperbaric Oxygen
  • Laser
  • Compression pumps

3
Whirlpool
  • Carrie Sussman (1998) stated that the lack of
    well designed clinical trials for the use of
    whirlpool with open wounds should encourage the
    clinician apply this modality with careful
    thought.
  • Three main reputed effects are
  • controlling infection through the removal of
    debris and exudate
  • increased perfusion to local tissues
  • neuronal effects that produce analgesia

4
Whirlpool Controls Infection?
  • Sussman (1998) indicates that uses of whirlpool
    to reduce the rate of infection in the literature
    is questionable.
  • She then sites literature that implicates
    whirlpool as a cause of nosocomial infections in
    patients with burns.
  • Many clinicians continue to use whirlpool even
    when it is not appropriate.

5
Whirlpool Increases Circulation?
  • The benefits of increasing circulation include
  • improved delivery of oxygen, nutrients,
    luekocytes, systemic antibiotics to tissues and
    removal of metabolites.

6
Whirlpool Induces Analgesia?
  • calming
  • analgesia
  • gate effect
  • sedation of warmth

7
Whirlpool Indications
  • Hecox (1994), Sussman (1998), and Loehne (2002,
    p.214) support the use of whirlpool with
  • wounds with necrosis (nekros Gr.. dead)
  • wounds with adherent dressings
  • wounds that are dirty from trauma
  • wounds with residual from topical agents

8
Whirlpool Contraindications
  • Hecox (1994)
  • hypotensive or dopamine(vasoconstrictor)
  • advanced arterial disease(Burger's Allen)
  • hemorrhage tendency
  • incontinence
  • acute deep vein thrombosis(DVT)
  • acute pulmonary embolus(PE)
  • deep abdominal/chest wounds
  • acute myocardial infarction
  • wet gangrene
  • pregnancy -- temperature must be less than 1000f
  • Sussman (1998)
  • moderate to severe edema
  • lethargy
  • unresponsiveness
  • maceration
  • febrile conditions
  • compromised cardiovascular or pulmonary system
  • acute phlebitis
  • renal failure
  • dry gangrene
  • incontinence

9
Whirlpool Precautions
  • Sussman (1998) Loehne (2002, p.214)
  • clean granulating wounds
  • epthelializing wounds
  • new skin grafts
  • new tissue flaps
  • non-necrotic ulcers secondary to diabetic
    neuropathy
  • Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
    (AHCPR, 1994)
  • Heel ulcers with dry escar should not be debrided
    unless there are signs of infection, fluctuant,
    or drainage.
  • Whirlpool discontinued when ulcer is clean

10
Whirlpool Procedures
  • Sussman (1998)
  • frequency and duration
  • no clear guidelines
  • water temperature
  • 37 degree Celsius or 98 oF (Sussman) too high
    for large immersions
  • (Loehne, 2002, p.213 Cameron, 1999, p.199)
  • tepid/nonthermal 80-92 oF (26.6-33.3 oC)
  • neutral 92-96 oF (33.3-35.5 oC)
  • thermal 96-104 oF (35.5-40 oC) causes stress
    on cardiopulmonary and nervous system limited
    body area with no medical complications
  • monitor vital signs (HR, BP, RR)
  • Hx cardiopulmonary or cardiac disease,
    cerebrovascular accident, or hypertension

11
(No Transcript)
12
Ultrasound
  • Cameron (1999) states that mixed evidence exists
    on the efficacy of ultrasound accelerating wound
    healing
  • Positive wound healing studies with ultrasound
  • Dyson Suckling (1978) pulsed 20 duty cycle,
    1.0 W/cm2, 3 MHz, 5-10 minutes, on the wounds
    perimeter, on venous stasis ulcerations
  • McDiarmid, Burns, Lewith, et al (1985) similar
    application on infected pressure ulcers as the
    Dyson Suckling study
  • No beneficial effect with wound healing
  • Lundeberg, Nordstrom, Brodda-Jansen, et al (1990)
  • Eriksson, Lundeberg, Malm (1991)
  • TerRiet, Kessels, Knipschild (1996)

13
Reported Physiological Effects of Ultrasound
  • physiological effects (Dyson, 1995)
  • increase fibroblastic activity
  • increase capillary permeability which increases
    calcium uptake
  • accelerate mast cell and macrophage releases
  • increase oxygen uptake with thermal effects
  • increase angiogenesis

14
Recommended Treatment Procedures
  • Cameron (1999, p.283-285) Kloth (2002,
    p.356-366)
  • 20 duty cycle
  • 0.5-1.0 W/cm2 reparative to remodeling
  • 1-3 MHz
  • 5-10 minutes
  • direct, indirect, or perimeter technique

15
Strength of Evidence for US
  • Conflicting results in the literature
  • Strength of evidence C

(Kloth, 2002, p.359-365)
16
(No Transcript)
17
Is it appropriate to use electrical stimulation
(ES) for tissue healing?
  • YES, however it has been difficult to gain
    acceptance as a viable treatment.
  • In 1994, The Clinical Practice Guidelines for the
    Treatment of Pressure Ulcers developed by the
    Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
    (AHCPR) recommends the use of ES on Stage III
    and IV pressure ulcers that are not responsive to
    conventional treatment.
  • Their recommendations are based on a B
    Strength-of-Evidence Ratings.

18
AHCPRs Evidence
  • Carley and Wainapel, 1985
  • Feedar, Kloth, and Gentzkow, 1991
  • Gentzkow, Pollack, Kloth, and Stubbs, 1991
  • Griffin, Tooms, Mendius, et al., 1991
  • Kloth and Feedar, 1988

19
Proposed Theories (Brown, 1995 McCulloch,
Kloth, Feedar, 1995Unger, 1992)
  • Increased microcirculation
  • Edema reduction/prevention
  • Antibacterial effects
  • Bio electric effects
  • Galvanotaxis
  • Injury Potential
  • Cellular effects

20
Protocols (slide 1 of 3)
  • CMDC (Continuous Microamperage Direct Current
  • 200 - 1,000 microamperes2 - 4 hours a day 3 -
    7 days a weekcathodal 3 -5 treatments to reduce
    bacteriaanodal until healed initiate only when
    wound free of infection if cessation of healing
    occurs, the polarity should be switched

21
Protocols (slide 2 of 3)
  • HVPC (High Volt Pulsed Current)
  • 75 - 200 volts80 - 100 pps45 - 60 minutes 3 -
    7 days a week cathodal 3 - 5 days for
    infectionanodal to heal, if plateau occurs,
    alter daily

22
Protocols (slide 3 of 3)
  • Low Voltage Pulsed Microamperage Current or MENS
    Microamperage Electrical Neuromuscular
    Stimulation
  • Arndt - Schulz Law - Weak stimuli increase
    physiological activity and very strong stimuli
    inhibits or abolishes activity.
  • monophasic or biphasic square wave
  • pulse duration up to 0.5 sec
  • freq. 0.1 - 99 Hz
  • peak intensity 990 microamperages
  • suggested uses
  • pain relief
  • edema
  • wound healing
  • two double-blind studies in 1994 - no improvement

23
ELECTRODE PLACEMENT (McCulloch, Kloth, Feedar,
1995)
  • This placement takes advantage of the Current of
    Injury Theory.
  • cathode over the wound, with the anode
    approximately 15cm proximal or closer to the
    spinal cord
  • anode over the wound, with the cathode
    approximately 15cm caudal or farther away from
    the spinal cord

24
Electro Summary
  • Electrical stimulation augments the bodys
    endogenous biochemical system.
  • It should be applied if there are no clinical
    signs of healing in 14 days.
  • Contraindications are the same as any electrical
    modality with the addition of
  • osteomyelitis
  • heavy metal residue

25
(No Transcript)
26
Hyperberic Oxygen(Gogia, 1995)
  • increased phagocytosis
  • decreased infection
  • increased fibroblast proliferation
  • increased epithelial proliferation
  • promotes collagen synthesis
  • increased angiogenesis

27
Indications for Nonhealing Wounds
  • Ischemic lesions
  • Venous stasis
  • Decubiti
  • Burns
  • DM
  • Cellulitis
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Pyoderma gangrenosum
  • Skin flaps in danger of ischemia

28
Contraindications and Precautions
  • aerobic bacteria
  • thrombophlebitis
  • large vessel occlusion
  • severe ischemia

29
Strength of EvidenceforHBO
  • Venous ulcers one small RCT and two case series
    rating of C
  • DM foot ulcers one RCT and two controlled
    trials rating of B

(Kloth, 2002, p.350-353)
30
HBO
  • Ciaravino et al., stated that the average cost of
    30 HBO treatments was 14K.

(Kloth, 2002, p.352)
31
(No Transcript)
32
Laser(Gogia, 1995)
  • He-Ne
  • Stimulate ATP formation
  • Increase immune system
  • Increase collagen synthesis
  • Treatment
  • 90 seconds of irradiation per cm2 _at_80 pps _at_ 4
    J/cm2

33
(No Transcript)
34
Normothermic Treatment
  • 37 1 oC (96.8 - 98.6 - 100.4 oF)
  • Infrared source of heat
  • semiocclusive moisture retentive dressing
  • Proposed impact on the wound
  • increase blood flow, tissue oxygenation,
    bacteriocidial, fibroblast proliferation, and
    increase the wound healing rate
  • Evidence one RCT, a controlled study, a pilot
    study, and one prospective study B
  • Follow the protocol (Kloth, 2002, p.321-322)

(Kloth, 2002, p.316-326)
35
References
  • Brown, M. (1995). Electrical stimulation for
    wound management. In P. P. Gogia (Ed.), Clinical
    wound management (pp. 175-183). Thorofare, NJ
    SLACK
  • Cameron, M. H. (1999). Hydrotherapy. In (Ed.),
    Physical agents in rehabilitation From research
    to practice (pp.174-216). Philadelphia W. B.
    Saunders.
  • Dyson, M. (1995). Ultrasound management for wound
    management. In P. P. Gogia (Ed.), Clinical wound
    management (pp. 197-204). Thorofare, NJ SLACK.
  • Gogia, P. P. (1995). Low-energy laser in wound
    management. In (Ed.), Clinical wound management
    (pp. 165-172). Thorofare, NJ SLACK.
  • Gogia, P. P. (1995). Oxygen therapy for wound
    management. In (Ed.), Clinical wound management
    (pp. 186-195). Thorofare, NJ SLACK.
  • Hecox, B., Mehreteab, T. A., Weisberg, J.
    (1994). Physical agents A comprehensive text
    for physical therapists. Norwalk, CT Appleton
    Lange.
  • Kloth, L. C. (2002). Adjunctive interventions for
    wound healing. In L. C. Kloth J. M. McCulloch
    (Eds.), Wound healing alternatives in management
    (3rd ed., pp. 316-382). Philadelphia, PA F.A.
    Davis.
  • Loehne, H. B. (2002). Wound debridement and
    irrigation. In L. C. Kloth J. M. McCulloch
    (Eds.), Wound healing alternatives in management
    (3rd ed., pp. 203-231). Philadelphia, PA F.A.
    Davis.
  • McCulloch, J. M., Kloth, L. C., Feedar, J. A.
    (Eds.). (1995). Wound healing alternatives in
    management (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA F.A.
    Davis.
  • Sussman, C., Bates-Jensen. (1998). Wound care
    a collaborative practice manual for physical
    therapists and nurses, Gaithersburg, MA Aspen.
  • Unger, P.G. (1992). Electrical enhancement of
    wound repair. Physical Therapy, 41-49.
  • U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
    (1994). Treatment of pressure ulcers (AHCPR
    Publication No. 95-0652). Rockville, MD Author.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com