Post Project Review University Light Rail - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Post Project Review University Light Rail

Description:

... Review. University Light Rail. Impact Mitigation Efforts Analyzed ... Staging big factor in reducing time of impact. Advance notice on utility disruption ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: billkn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Post Project Review University Light Rail


1
Post Project ReviewUniversity Light Rail
  • Impact Mitigation Efforts Analyzed
  • And Evaluated

2
Report Focus
  • Were the mitigation measures successful in
    reducing the impact on businesses?
  • What is the current status of the business
    community eighteen months after completion?

3
Statistical Data
  • Sales tax revenues
  • Traffic counts

4
Analysis of Sales Tax Data
  • Five year history compared
  • Revenues down 6.7 during construction period of
    sixteen months
  • Business revenues showed biggest drop as heavy
    construction was immediately in front of business
  • Staging construction a major factor in reducing
    impacts

5
Analysis of Traffic Study
  • UDOT Traffic on Utah Highways report of 1995
    2001
  • 2003 traffic surveys conducted by Fehr/Peers
  • Interviews with business owners, all with
    drive-through business

6
Analysis contd
  • Peak hour traffic ahead of projections by three
    to four years
  • Business owners report back to pre-construction
    levels, half see an increase
  • All agreed traffic is at full strength

7
Personal Interview Results
  • Conducted by U of U School of Business
  • What were the impacts of mitigation efforts?
  • What can stakeholders do to improve?
  • What are impacts now that the project is
    completed?

8
Satisfaction
  • Access maintained
  • Staging big factor in reducing time of impact
  • Advance notice on utility disruption
  • High marks for contractors communication
  • Contractor incentive very effective
  • Loan fund
  • Majority agree 400 South is a better street

9
Dissatisfaction
  • Hotline mixed reviews, personnel an issue
  • Marketing efforts also mixed
  • Loss of curbside parking
  • UTA not as business sensitive as they should be
  • Businesses located next to stations parking
    problems
  • UTA representatives changed, not consistent
  • Perception that information was still not
    consistent enough

10
Conclusions
  • Overall business decline substantially less than
    feared
  • Marketing efforts should be more individualized
  • The contractor is essential in effectively
    executing the mitigation plan
  • Stakeholders are well advised to listen to and
    address concerns of the community
  • This was truly an example of how business and
    government can get along when they set their
    minds to it. Mark Hale, Owner, Big H Drive In
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com