The Role of Phonological Capacity in Children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Role of Phonological Capacity in Children

Description:

Research question. 1) Between speech perception and speech production, which component is more ... New word production task: repeating minimally ... Results: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: 1401156
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Role of Phonological Capacity in Children


1
??????????????
??????????????
  • The Role of Phonological Capacity in Childrens
    Vocabulary Learning Process
  • ???? ???
  • ? ? ? ???

2
Introduction
  • Young children display a rapid growth in
    vocabulary (Smith, 1926 Templin, 1957 Carey,
    1978).
  • Word learning essentially involves a mapping
    between the sound patterns (phonological
    representations) and the meanings (semantic
    representations) of individual words.
  • Fast-mapping process (Carey Bartlett, 1978)
  • Nonlinguistic strategies
  • Linguistic constraints

3
  • Mapping on the phonological end (Bishop, 1997)

permanent lexical representation
long-term storage
phonological trace in STM
short-term storage
phonological segmentation
sequence of phonemes
4
  • Baddeleys working memory model (Gathercole
    Baddeley, 1993)

phonological LTM
rehearsal process
phonological STM
speech perception
5
Purpose
  • This study aims to investigate the role of
    phonological capacity in childrens vocabulary
    learning process.
  • Phonological capacity
  • Production
  • Discrimination

6
Research question
  • 1) Between speech perception and speech
    production, which component is more important for
    the success of word learning?
  • 2) Which kind of word is easier to be learned?
    The one that can be discriminated easily, or the
    one that can be produced.
  • 3) Other factors, such as phonological memory and
    vocabulary knowledge, are involved in the word
    learning process. What are their relative
    contributions in the word learning process?

7
Method
  • Subjects
  • Total number 80 preschool children
  • Mean age 43 (3050)
  • Sex equal numbers of boys and girls
  • Group K1 and K2
  • Four experimental tasks
  • Phonological capacity tasks
  • Phonological memory task
  • Vocabulary task
  • Word learning task

8
Tasks on phonological capacity
  • Picture naming task naming pictures of familiar
    objects
  • New word production task repeating minimally
    contrastive novel words
  • For example
  • New word discrimination task choosing proper
  • referent of the target sound

9
  • Materials (adopted from Cheung, 2000)

10
  • Results
  • Childrens performance in two age groups
  • The result is different from that of Cheung
    Hsus study (2000).

11
The Task on phonological memory
  • Repeating the nonwords orderly.
  • For example ba3gan1 zhau1dai3 ku4shang4
  • Materials (adopted from Hu, 1999)

12
  • Results
  • The mean score was 20.48 (Max. 36), with the
    mean accuracy of 56.9.
  • Childrens performances in two age groups

13
The task on vocabulary
  • Materials Peabody Pictures Vocabulary
    Test-Revision (Chinese version Lu Liu, 1988)
  • For example

14
  • Results
  • The mean score was 30.88.
  • Childrens performances in two age groups

15
The task on word learning
  • Materials
  • The example of picture stories

????????????????? ??????,??????????
???????????????? ?????????,???????????
16
  • Scripts of the shovel story
  • The comprehension test

17
  • Sound category

Perception
Average
Average
Production
18
  • Novel words

19
  • Results
  • The mean score was 12.68 (Max. 32), with the
    mean accuracy of 39.6, higher than the chance
    level.
  • Childrens performances in two age groups

20
Syntheses
  • Between phonological capacity and word learning
  • On individual subjects

21
  • Between phonological capacity and word learning
  • On word items

The result of original design
The recomputed result
22
  • Correlational analyses
  • A stepwise multiple regression

23
Conclusion
  • The ability to comprehend the target labels is
    plays a major role in the word learning process,
    while the ability to produce the target labels is
    important when contextual cues are limited.
  • The phonological form of target words does not
    affect the word learning process.
  • Vocabulary size is crucial for learning new
    words, while the role of phonological memory does
    not appear to be important in this model.

24
  • Thanks for your attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com