Role of the Center of Operational Analysis in Integration of Science, Industry, Government capacity

1
Role of the Center of Operational Analysis in
Integration of Science, Industry, Government
capacity to Support Integrated Security Sector in
Bulgaria
Business and Science for Security and Defence
Industrial RD

• Dr. Velizar Shalamanov - Head of C4I Dept. in
  IPP-BAS (www.caxbg.com/is)
• Shalamanov_at_acad.bg

2
Contents

• Challenges of Integrated Security Sector as
  result of Comprehensive Approach to Security
• Bulgarian academic community answer SfP981149
  SfP982063 building capacity for integrated
  approach to RD and ET in security area
• Role of the Center of Operational Analysis in
  Integration of Science, Industry, Government
  capacity (in cooperation with NC3A and EDA) to
  Support Integrated Security Sector in Bulgaria

3
Base for analysis

• EU experience
• EDA (2004)
• FP security theme in FP7 (2007-13)
• NATO experience
• Science Committee Security Trough Science
  Program (focus on SfP projects)
• RTO panels and working groups
• ACT network of CoE (incl. JWC-Norway,
  JFTC-Poland, JLLAC-Portugal)
• NC3A specific experience as customer funded,
  strategy focused organization for transformation
  through C3 technologies Sponsor Account Segment
• Bilateral programs outside EU on civil security
• US (USTDA example on Info Security and IEMS)
• National experience
• Interoperability Center, Advanced Defense
  Research Institute of 1999 with MECC between MoD
  and BAS
• Center for NS and Defense Research (2002)
• SCC to GSC-CP (2003)
• COA in BAS (2004)
• JTSAC-CS in BAS (2005) case by case
  integration of academia, industry, government
  (key example of EU TACOM SEE-2006)

4
Analysis, Assessment and Design Projects

• Bulgarian White Papers
• Defense White Paper (2002)
• Civil Security White Paper (2004)
• SECRES - 2008
• SECREV 2009
• EU
• ESRIF 2007-2009 (after GoP, ESRAB, PASR, FP7)
• EU FP7 FORESEC 2008-2010
• EU EDA Study for new 12 members 2009
• NATO-EU SAFE (Security Advancing a Framework for
  Enquiry) 2007-2009

5
WG10 supports ESRIFs opinion that Europe will
need over the coming years to develop a Common
Capability-Based Planning Process and possibly,
ultimately a Joint Security Capability Plan.

• The Common Capability-Based Planning Process will
  be prepared by an Independent Adequate
  Structure populated by experts from
  Agencies/Institutions dealing with operational
  issues even through a constructive dialog between
  that structure, public laboratories and industry
  (Extensive use of inter-operability between
  security and defence), such as to translate
  capabilities in technologies and to facilitate
  prioritisation of efforts.
• This JSCP has to get a political approval at the
  right level
• A Permanent Structure (to be identified/ created)
  is necessary to update and maintain JSCP.

6
Solution

• EU level (ESRIF, in particular WG10)
• Interoperability / Standardization
• Joint security capabilities plan (based on
  scenarios) - JSCP
• Independent adequate structure
• Permanent (stable) structure with administrative
  cell
• Funding
• Permanent joint structures for cooperation with
  NATO
• EU Commission creates a stable structure to
  manage the ESRIA beyond ESRIF.
• MS level (example of Bulgaria)
• National security scenarios and capabilities plan
  project of COA in 2007
• Security Council level Research Coordination
  Panel with advisor to PM on RT (including
  security related)
• Security Research Program in the framework of
  National Research Program (incl. in National Fund
  for Scientific Research)
• Security and Defense Research Administration
  (CNSDR experience since 2002)
• JTSAC-CS in BAS with Universities, Industry and
  End-users with Civil-Military interface
  (experience since 2006)
• Funding multisource (national / international,
  public / private)

7
The proposed Governance structure by ESRIF WG10
should act in accordance with the following
principles

• Central role for EU High Rep for European
  Security and Defence Policy and Common Foreign
  Security Policy / Security Council
• Permanent Structure should keep in close loop
  representatives of each stakeholder
• For each of the 4 missions, monitor coherence
  between all actors of SR following ESRIA
• Stay in contact with Technological and Industrial
  Base with a structured dialogue
• Use / take into account existing co-ordinations
  regional, national or inter governmental in
  some fields (example crisis management)
• Separate operational co-ordination from
  governance co-ordination
• Parallel Implementation between capabilities and
  RT work
• In the meanwhile, public and private stakeholders
  alike, both at EU and national levels will need
  to proceed to systematic identification of
  available and required capabilities. In specific
  sectors, relevant agencies can play an important
  role.

8
COA/JTSAC-CS in BAS

• Civil security (CS) focus organization,
  technology, human factor integration based on
  knowledge of all the research bodies of the
  Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (principal
  scientific advisor to the Nation since 1869)
• Research Lab and Test Bed with Universities,
  Industry and End-users for integration and
  validation / certification of civil security
  solutions (massive use of MS in EU/NATO network)
• Civil-Military interface with national military
  MS Center and ADRI with focus on Military
  Support to Civilian Authorities

9
Knowledge IT dimension of COA/JTSAC

• Library and documentation center
• Knowledge Management Portal
• Advanced Distance Learning courses development
• Co-learning / VTC environment
• Computer Assisted eXercise environment
• Advanced Technology Demonstration environment
• After Action Report and Analysis Lessons
  Learned (feedback mechanisms) capacity

10
BPM and Governance / Management of JTSAC-CS

• Use of Business Process Modeling for permanent
  improvement
• Organizational flexibility based on Architectural
  Approach with Activity Based Costing, Roles
  Definition / Job Descriptions and Portfolio
  Project Management
• Strategic Map and Balanced Score Cards Management
  with key strategic initiatives
• 2004-2008 Building of knowledge base,
  Infrastructure development, Training of the core
  staff
• 2009-2013 Business Process Excellence, BAS
  level integration, Interface with MoD-MoI-MoES,
  FP7/ACT EPOW involvement
• Next steps Element of ACT CoE MSCA, Transferable
  CoE Model for the region, Integration in ESRIA
  implementation network (FP8, ???)

11
Conclusions

• BAS to develop capacity for sponsor account
  management for integrated security sector,
  industry, NATO (NC3A, RTO) and EU (EDA), regional
  partners (Adriatic Caspian Seas)
• UNWE to develop jointly with BAS an education
  program in Integrated Security Sector Development
  for Administration, Industry and partners from
  NATO, EU, large SEE
• Network around BAS Security RD Center and UNWE
  Security ET Center of research and education
  institutions of MoFA, MoD, MoI, MoES, SA NS, NIS,
  NPS, SC PCI and other elements of the integrated
  security sector
• National security RD/ET program with
  coordinator in PM Office
• Science consultative committee to the Security
  Council of the Prime Minister
• Consolidated representation in NATO SC, NC3A,
  NATO RTO, NIAG, EDA, EU JRC and FP on theme
  Security
• Integrity Pact between BDIA, administration, BAS
  Security RD Center and UNWE Security ET Center
  for transparency, accountability and
  effectiveness in result oriented security related
  RD, ET

12
No comments for the national level

• ESRIF - WG10 considers that a Technology
  Investment Fund should be set up at EU level.
  Such an investment scheme should cover a number
  of key technologies that will deliver
  capabilities to protect
• critical European energy, transport and ICT
  infrastructure. This is mostly nationally owned
  infrastructure, therefore investment by the EU
  should be in the form of a grant subject to
  certain conditions, such as clear EU added value
  and interoperable technology
• the EU's external borders (including the relevant
  maritime surveillance). The same conditions
  should apply as for critical European
  infrastructure
• Galileo and GMES/Kopernikus ground space
  infrastructure. As this is a truly European owned
  infrastructure, investment by the EU should be
  100.
• The above is in accordance with WG10s proposed
  vision on co-ordination of ESRIA, as presented in
  Brussels 14 January, and amended according
  SEC(2008)2281 and SEC(2008)2282 on Joint Research
  Programmes