A review on bioaerosol science, technology and engineering: current and beyond - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 69
About This Presentation
Title:

A review on bioaerosol science, technology and engineering: current and beyond

Description:

A review on bioaerosol science, technology and engineering: current and beyond – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:531
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 70
Provided by: maoshe9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A review on bioaerosol science, technology and engineering: current and beyond


1
A review on bioaerosol science, technology and
engineering current and beyond
  • Maosheng Yao

College of Environmental Sciences and
Engineering Peking University
2
Outline
  • Bioaerosol Emissions
  • Air Sampling Techniques
  • Biological Assessment, Detection and Control
  • Current State of Bioaerosol Research

3
Biological Agents in the Environments
  • Particles of biological origins
  • --bacteria, fungi, viruses , pollen
  • --their derivatives such as endotoxins,
    glucans, and mycotoxins
  • --fungal allergens, indoor house dust
    mites, dog, cat allergens

0.5-2µm for bacteria 2-5µm for fungi commonly
found, viruses are usually below 0.3 µm
4
Bioaerosol Emissions
  • Natural environments
  • Human and animal are sources of bioaerosol
  • Waste recycling, bio-solid land application,
    composting, agriculture, pharmaceutical and
    bio-tech activities
  • Hospital settings (surgery, organ transplant, and
    dental treatment)
  • Bioterrorism events

5

Why Are We Concerned about These Biological
Agents?
  • Exposure to the biological agents presents a
    serious health challenge both for public and
    private sectors
  • Respiratory diseases such as asthma, pneumonia,
    and allergies.
  • Infectious diseases such as SARS, and Bird Flu.

SARS outbreak in 2003
Influenza (bird flu) Outbreak
6
Global Asthma Impacts
China
According to WHO estimates, 300 million people
suffer from asthma and 255, 000 people died of
asthma in 2005
7
Pneumonia Death in Children lt 5 Years Old
WHO estimates that up to 1 million children under
5 die each year from pneumonia.
8
Annual Impacts of Epidemic Influenza
Estimates for the US
  • Cases 20-50 millions
  • Days of illness 100-200 millions
  • Work school loss tens of millions
  • Hospitalizations 85,000-550,000
  • Deaths 34,000-50,000
  • Economic loss billions of dollars

MMWR 2003 52 (RR-8) Thompson et al. JAMA 2003
289179 Thompson et al., JAMA 2004 2921333
Adams PF et al. Vital Health Stat 1999 10(200)
In addition, infectious diseases took a
tremendous toll both on human and economy
9
Global Outbreak of SARS in 2003
10
Social Impacts of SARS
11
  • Increasing Threat of Bio-terrorism That May
    Release Lethal Airborne Biological Agents

12
Bio-Sampling
  • The first critical step
  • for monitoring, assessment, or control strategy
    for the biological inhalation exposure

13
Air Sampling Techniques
  • Impactors
  • Liquid impingers
  • Filters
  • Electrostatic precipitator

14
Impactors
  • Andersen six-stage impactor was
  • developed in the 50s and
  • widely used as a standard for
  • bioaerosol sampling
  • BioStage Impactor (SKC, Inc., Eighty Four, PA)
  • --collect microorganisms onto agar surface
  • --28.3 Liter/min with an impaction velocity
    of 24m/s

BioStage
It was used in anthrax investigation
15
Principle of Collection by Impactor
16
Portable Microbial Impactors
  • Becoming more popular for sampling airborne
    biological agents
  • -- Battery-powered, portable, easy to
    handle
  • -- High volume sampling, more than 100
    L/min

17
Particle Collection of Portable Samplers
18
Portable Microbial Impactors
Bio-Culture 120 L/min
Microflow 120 L/min
SMA MicroPortable 28.3/141.5 L/min
19
Portable Microbial Impactors
RCS High Flow 100 L/min
Millipore Air Tester 140/180 L/min
SAS Super 180 180L/min
They have been used in military sites
20
Portable Microbial Impactors
  • These samplers are increasingly being used for
    bio-sampling
  • Their sampling performances
  • are not fully described or investigated

MAS-100 100 L/min
Investigation of physical and biological
collection efficiencies
21
Sampler Testing System
Yao, M. and Mainelis, G. Aerosol Sci. Technology,
2006, 401-13.
22
Physical Collection Efficiencies Cutoff Sizes
of Seven Portable Microbial Samplers When
Sampling PSL Particles
Virus
anthrax
Yao, M. and Mainelis, G. Aerosol Sci. Technology,
2006, 401-13.
23
Comparison of Sampler Performance with Particle
Inhalation and Deposition in Human Lung
Yao and Mainelis, J. of Exposure Analysis and Env
Epi, (2007), 17, 3138
24
  • Biological Collection Efficiency

the ability of the sampler to not only collect,
but also keep the viability of the bio-particles
25
Influences of Jet Velocity and Jet-to-plate
Distance on Biological Collection Efficiency
26
Air sampling Techniques
  • filtration
  • gelatin filter

Anthrax surrogate
27
Air Sampling Techniques
  • BioSampler
  • 1) Liquid Impinger, use of centrifuge and
    impaction to collect aerosol particles with a
    sampling flow rate of 12.5 L/min
  • 2) Longer sampling time up to 8 hours
  • 3) Transferring aerosols into hydrosols

BioSampler
Powerful aerosol-2-hydrosol sampling techniques
are needed
28
Bio- sampling Challenges
  • Impaction-based sampling techniques were shown to
    cause damages to the viability of microorganisms
  • Virus is too small to be collected by these
    techniques their sampling method is
    significantly lacking
  • There is a need to develop a more advanced
    sampling strategy

29
Electrostatic Collection
  • Electrostatic collection is a mechanism of
    collecting the airborne charged particles using
    the electrical force
  • Collection velocity is about 2 to 4 orders of
    magnitude lower than that of BioStage impactor
    (24 m/s)
  • Lower mechanical stress and less desiccation upon
    the microorganisms being sampled

30
Electrosampler was designed to investigate if
natural charges of microorganisms can be used for
their effective electrostatic collection
Yao and Mainelis, Journal of Aerosol Science,
2006, 37513-527
31
Physical Collection Efficiency of Electrosampler
Electrostatic field may have the ability to
collect viruses
Electrostatic field, 5kV/cm, was used
32
Comparisons of outdoor bacteria sampling using
Electrosampler and BioStage impactor
Electrostatic method provides a better biological
quantification
33
Use of Electrostatic Field in Collecting Airborne
Toxins
34
Use of Electrostatic Field in Collecting Airborne
Allergens
35
Bioaerosol Detection and Assessment (Combining
Physical , Biochemical and Molecular Techniques )
  • The electrostatic method demonstrates ability in
    collecting viruses from the air.
  • Virus concentration could be very low
  • in the air, even collected, might not be enough
  • to be detected.
  • Combination of electrostatic method with
  • advanced molecular techniques such as
  • qPCR and ELISA may offer a solution, e.g., for
  • detecting influenza A virus.

36
Globally confirmed human cases of H5N1 avian
influenza since 2003
37
Influenza A Virus
  • Commonly known as flu, is an infectious disease
    of birds and mammals caused by an RNA virus
  • Typically, influenza is transmitted from infected
    mammals through the air by coughs or sneezes,
    creating bioaerosols containing the virus
  • Currently, the strand is only limited to animals,
    but it is very likely to mutate further becoming
    a human-to-human case.

Hong Kong Flu (magnified approximately
70,000 times) in May 1997
38
Spanish Flu in 1918
In 1918, Spanish flu killed 675,000 people in
the U.S. and an estimated 2050 million people
worldwide
39
Detection of influenza A Virus
Metal Plate
Virus particles
Air Out
Air In
E
qPCR
ELISA
Metal Plate
Biosensor

96-well-plate
Endotoxin/Glucan
Yao et al. (2007) Integration of Technologies for
Constant Monitoring of Exposure E-Letter,
Science.
40
Environmental Allergens
  • Common Allergens?
  • House dust allergens (Der p 1 and Der f 1),
    cat allergens Fel d 1 (cat), dog allergen Can f 1
    (dog), Bla g 1 (cockroach), Bla g 2 (mouse)
  • fungal allergens, e.g., Alternaria alternata
    allergen Alt1
  • Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA) is
    often used to analyze allergens

41
ELISA Sample Processing
Dissolve into 1.5 mL PBS 0.05 Tween 20
shaking 2 h
Dust Sieving (gt30 mg)
centrifuge 20 min
supernatant
96-well plate
Antibody coated plate
42
Procedure of ELISA tests
ELISA can be used together with air sampling
technique for measuring airborne viruses and
allergens
43
House Dust Mite (Der p Der f 1)
44
Principle of LAL/Glucatell Assay(airborne
endotoxin and glucan)
LAL
LAL
Activates
Endotoxin (LPS)
(1,3)-ß-D-glucan
Factor C
Factor G
LAL
LAL
Factor B
LAL
Preclotting Enzyme
LAL
Substrate Ac-Ile-Glu-Ala-Arg-pNA.
pNA (yellow)
Horseshoe crab LAL (Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate)
45
LAL/Glucatell ???????
Add sample extracts, standards into 96 well
plate
Filter Extraction
Dilution (10-3)
0.05 Tween 20 for Endotoxin 0.5 N NaOH for
glucan, neutralized by Tris-HCL
Incubation (15 min at 37 oC)
add LAL or Glucatell Agents
Placed inside spectraphotometer
Log(Y)ALog(X)
60-80 min
46
Results for Road Dust
In collaboration with Lovelace Respiratory
Research Laboratory
47
Results for Road Dust
In collaboration with Lovelace Respiratory
Research Laboratory
48
qPCR for quantification of microbial species
Primary tasks include
  • Selection or design of primer sets for specific
    microbial species (alternaria spp)
  • Design of probes for specific allergens
    develop standard curves
  • quantitative-PCR tests for DNA extracts from
    environmental samples

DNA extraction
Primers Probes
Standard Curve
qPCR tests
49
qPCR for quantification of microbial species
qPCR reaction mixture
Template DNA
Forward/Reverse Primers, Probes
dNTPs
DNA Polymerase
Buffer
Tris, KCl, Mg2 , BAS , etc.
50
qPCR Application Curves
Vesper et al, 2005, American Laboratory, pp. 11-12
51
Quantification of Environmental Sample
Eff10(-1/slope) -1
XnX0(1E)n
qPCR can be used for detecting airborne low
concentration biological agents
52
Other Bioaerosol Detection Techniques
  • 1) Bioaerosol mass spectrometry (BAMS) (Herbert
    et al., 2005)
  • 2) Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (Sengupta
    et al., 2007)
  • 3) Flow cytometry with fluorochrome (Chen and Li,
    2005
  • 4) Bio-functional oligonucleotides based
    techniques such as aptamer (Brody et al., 1999)
  • 5) Nanowire-based detection techniques

All these techniques can be also used for
detecting airborne low concentration biological
agents
53
Microorganism Inactivation
Yao and Mainelis, Environmental Science
Technology, 2005, 393338-3344
54
Survival rates of P. fluorescens bacteria when
deposited on MCE filter and exposed to the
electrostatic field
Yao and Mainelis, Environmental Science
Technology, 2005, 393338-3344
55
Use of nano-scale Zero Valent iron particles in
Inactivating Microbial Species
Characterization of nanoscale iron particles
  • FE-SEM Images
  • NZVI particles
    Iron Oxides

Shaking-oxidization
56
Inactivation of B. subtilis by NZVI particles
57
Characterization of the Inactivation of B.
subtilis

(a)
(b)
Pure BST
NZVIBST anaerobic
(c)
(d)
FeOOHBST Aerobic
NZVIBST Aerobic

58
Inactivation of P. fluorescence by NZVI
59
Inactivation Mechanisms by NZVI
Gram-positive
Matthew T. Cabeen Christine
Jacobs-Wagner,Nature Reviews Microbiology 3,
601-610 (August 2005)
Gram-negative
60
Inactivation of A. versicolor by NZVI
61
Characterization of the Inactivation of A.
versicolor
Submitted to Applied Environmental Microbiology
62
Summary of NZVI Inactivation
  • Inactivation was fast and efficient,
  • within 5 minutes, all B. subtilis were inactivated
  • Due to its small size, the inactivation
    efficiency was very high, and 10mg/ml can achieve
    good results
  • The inactivation depended on the membrane type of
    the microbial species, e.g., no effects on fungi
    species tested

63
Other Biological Control Technologies
  • Biofiltration (Sanchez-Monedero et al., 2003)
  • X-Ray enhanced electrostatic field
  • Photocatalytic materials such as TiO2 have been
    investigated (Pal et al., 2005).
  • Cold plasma (Birmingham and Hammerstrom, 2000)
    and UV light (Tseng and Li, 2005)
  • Control of air stream, e.g., negative pressure
    rooms

64
Current Research Areas of BioAerosol Science
  • Integration of bioaerosol science with molecular
    science such as qPCR, PCR, and ELISA
  • High volume of sampling Portable Microbial
    Sampler, aerosol-2-hydrosol techniques
  • Investigation of the link between bioaerosol
    exposure and health effects
  • Development of high throughput environmental
    bio-sensor

65
Current Research Areas of BioAerosol Science
  • Combining bioaerosol with physics, chemistry,
    bio-medical engineering and molecular techniques
  • Drug delivery to the lung using aerosol
    technology
  • Human early disease detection such as lung cancer
  • Inactivation of BioAerosols

66
Biological Exposure Assessment and Control
Air Sampling
Bioaerosol Emission
Exposure Assessment
Detection
Biological Control
Prevent
Minimize
Human Biological Exposure
67
Biological Exposure Assessment and Control
Detect
Control
Collect
CDC
68
Bioaerosol field is multidisciplinary , and
requires many areas of expertise
69
Thank you !!!
Maosheng Yao,PhD PKU 100 Scholar Program
Professor Email yao_at_pku.edu.cn Web
http//pantheon.yale.edu/my227/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com