Sept2_Lecture3 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sept2_Lecture3

Description:

Huge difference between developed and developing world ... Example of different cultures of Drosophila immune, or not, to a bacterial pathogen ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: paulh6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sept2_Lecture3


1
Lecture 3The central role of parasites in
evolution
2
The central role of parasites in
evolution J.B.S. Haldane (1892-1964)
3
J.B.S. Haldane
  • The son of a famous physiologist, he had a long
    history of using himself as a guinea pig in
    experiments with poisonous gases (along with his
    dad)
  • Once lost two teeth, which exploded due to the
    rapid decompression in his sinuses, during one
    experiment

Four stages of acceptance i) this is worthless
nonsense ii) this is an interesting, but
perverse, point of view iii) this is true, but
quite unimportant iv) I always said so.
4
J.B.S. Haldane (1892-1964)
  • Though never awarded a doctoral degree, he made
    seminal contributions in several fields including
    biochemistry, enzymology, physiology
  • In 1932 published The Causes of Evolution, a
    landmark in reconciling the theories of natural
    selection and Mendelian genetics
  • Held the Galton Chair in Biometry, University
    College London, 1937-57
  • A visionary, who, earlier than perhaps anyone
    else, saw the importance of infectious disease in
    evolution

5
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Obtaining food and mates and protection against
    natural forces such as cold, or predators, is
    only part of the story
  • Useful to distinguish at this point between an
    organisms abiotic and biotic environment
  • -abiotic?
  • -biotic?

6
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Of these, the biotic environment is probably much
    more important evolutionarily
  • I want to suggest that the struggle against
    disease, and particularly infectious disease, has
    been a very important evolutionary agent

7
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • How important is disease as a killing agent in
    nature?
  • One general trend may be disease as a
    density-dependent check on population growth
    (along with lack of resources, space)
  • Why density dependent?
  • The impacts of disease will of course differ for
    different speciesHow about for humans?

8
Disease and Evolution, 1949
9
Disease and Evolution, 1949
10
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Huge difference between developed and developing
    world
  • Infectious disease still kills gt 1/3 of people
    worldwide
  • Mostly in developing countries (big populations)
    and mostly kids

11
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • How do you think infectious disease has impacted
    the human population through history (and
    pre-history)?

12
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • A disease may be an advantage or a disadvantage
    to a species in competition with others
  • Example of different cultures of Drosophila
    immune, or not, to a bacterial pathogen
  • Example of wild southern African ungulates
    infected with trypanosomes
  • Impossible to introduce cattle in such areas, and
    even African breeds have not had time to evolve
    immunity
  • Native species (more to the point, individuals)
    are at an advantage because of the parasite, an
    important part of the biotic environment

13
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Europeans have used their genetic resistance to
    such viruses as that of measles as a weapon
    against primitive as effective as fire-arms
  • What other episodes in evolutionary history have
    been due to infectious disease rather than the
    sorts of adaptations we tend to focus on?
  • http//viscog.beckman.uiuc.edu/grafs/demos/15.html

14
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • In all species investigated the genetical
    diversity as regards resistance to disease is
    vastly greater than that as regards resistance to
    predators.
  • It is much easier for a mouse to get a set of
    genes which enable it to resist bacteria than a
    set which enables it to resist cats.
  • These remarks have been borne out by decades of
    study

15
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Other ideas/speculations in his paper
  • Large amount of unexplained biochemical diversity
    in serological tests may play a part in disease
    resistance
  • (outlines tests for associations between, say,
    diptheria susceptibility and various blood
    groups)
  • Genes for generating resistance variation should
    be particularly mutable, as long as other genes
    not affected
  • Negative and positive frequency-dependent
    selection
  • (when be rare or common is selectively
    advantageous)

16
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Pathogen-driven speciation
  • Once a pair of races is geographically
    separated, they will be exposed to different
    pathogens. Such races will tend to diverge
    antigenically, and some of that divergence may
    lower the fertility of crosses.

17
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • Social aspects of disease
  • It will be on the whole an antisocial agencyit
    is doubtful that many birds could survive the
    faecal contamination which characterizes the
    colonies of many sea birds.
  • Evolutionary psychology and Darwinian medicine
  • A vast variety of apparently irrelevant habits
    and instincts may prove to have selective value
    as a means of avoiding disease.
  • Examples?

18
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • evolution of virulence
  • Perhaps the theory that most diseases evolve
    into symbioses is somewhat Panglossist. I doubt
    if it occurs as a general rule, though it may do
    so.
  • Panglossist?
  • Do most diseases evolve into symbioses?

19
Disease and Evolution, 1949
Given enough time a state of peaceful coexistence
eventually becomes established between any host
and parasite. -Rene Dubos
20
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • He also notes that resistance to disease is
    rarely absolute, in part because viruses and
    bacteria evolve so quickly
  • The most that the average species can achieve is
    to dodge its minute enemies by constantly
    producing new genotypes, as the agronomists are
    constantly producing new rust-resistant wheat
    varieties.
  • The banana clone (a word that Haldane coined)
    Gros Michel was widely exported, but has been
    all but wiped out by a fungal root pathogen

21
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • http//www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF9/977.htm
    l
  • Although commonplace today, bananas only became a
    staple in North America's diet late in the 19th
    century.
  • They could do so because of a genetic freak--a
    spontaneous mutation in a kind of banana native
    to Southeast Asia.
  • The new banana was triploid, big, sweet, and
    seedless
  • The new mutation also had a characteristic that
    made long-distance transport possible all the
    bananas on a stalk ripen at once, about three
    weeks after they've grown to harvestable size.

22
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • The French transported cuttings of the new plant
    to the Caribbean, where it thrived. They named it
    Gros Michel.
  • The Gros Michel was a true commercial banana, and
    the variety that won the hearts of people living
    outside the tropics.
  • Gros Michel had a serious weakness it was
    susceptible to two kinds of fungus diseases.
  • One, called yellow sigatoka, could be controlled
    by spraying. The other was soil-borne Panama
    disease, a kind of fusarium wilt, and could not
    be cured or prevented.

23
Disease and Evolution, 1949
  • The growers' only option was to keep moving
    banana plantations to fresh land. By the 1960s,
    new land ran out
  • Instead, they found a new banana. This one,
    christened Cavendish, was discovered in a Saigon
    botanical garden. It too was a big, sweet,
    seedless triploid that ripened weeks after
    harvest, but it resisted Panama disease. Swiftly
    and with no fanfare, Cavendish bananas replaced
    Gros Michel.
  • The Cavendish is now the banana of commerce.

24
Case study I Parasites and the advantage of sex
Which reproductive mode is better sexual or
asexual?
  • JMS died recently
  • Student of Haldane
  • Aircraft engineer in WWII, came to biology later
    in life
  • Leading thinker on the evolutionary scandal of
    sex
  • John Maynard Smith

25
  • Sex is costly, not to mention complicated and
    dangerous
  • Searching for mates takes time and energy, and
    has risks (?)
  • Potential mates may demand additional exertion or
    investment before mating
  • After all that, mating might prove to be
    infertile
  • Why go to all the trouble?

26
Case study I Parasites and the advantage of sex
Which reproductive mode is better sexual or
asexual?
  • Null model (what a null model?)
  • A females reproductive mode does not affect the
    number of offspring she can make
  • A females reproductive mode does not affect the
    probability that her offspring will survive
  • (John Maynard Smith, 1978)

27
Case study I Parasites and the advantage of sex
Which reproductive mode is better sexual or
asexual?
  • Imagine a population founded by three
    individuals a sexual female, a sexual male, and
    an asexual female
  • Every generation each female produces four
    offspring, after which the parents die
  • All offspring survive to reproduce
  • Half the offspring of sexual females are female
    (the other half are male) but all the asexuals
    offspring are of course female
  • What happens?

28
In a population conforming to JMSs assumptions,
asexual females produce twice as many
grandchildren as sexuals, and fraction of
asexuals climbs
29
  • Asexuals should take over. And yet the vast
    majority of multicellular species are sexual.
  • Whats going on?
  • JMSs model illustrates, as he intended it to,
    that these facts represent a paradox for
    evolutionary theory
  • Its an evolutionary scandal!

30
  • Sex must confer benefits that allow it to persist
    in spite of the strong reproductive advantage of
    parthenogenesis.
  • The benefits must lie in the violation of one or
    both of those assumptions.
  1. A females reproductive mode does not affect the
    number of offspring she can make
  2. A females reproductive mode does not affect the
    probability that her offspring will survive

31
  • The first assumption is actually violated in
    species in which fathers provide resources or
    parental care essential for producing young.
  • This includes humans.
  • But such species are in the minority. In most
    species, males contribute only genes.
  • A general advantage to sex is thus likely to be
    found in violation of the second assumption

32
  • What might account for a difference in the
    probability of survival between sexual and
    asexual offspring?
  • Asexual reproduction (clonal) mode means
    offspring are identical to parent (mother)
  • Sexual mode leads to diversity.
  • Mutant forms of genes can spread easily through a
    population
  • Recombination the formation of hybrid DNA
    molecules combining genetic information from two
    sources into a new mosaic
  • (its a double-edged sword.Why?

33
  • By the late 1980s, in the contest to explain sex,
    only two hypotheses remained in contention.
  • One, the deleterious mutation hypothesis, was the
    idea that sex exists to purge a species of
    damaging genetic mutations
  • Alexey Kondrashov has been its principal champion
  • He argues that in an asexual population, every
    time a creature dies because of a mutation, that
    mutation dies with it. In a sexual population,
    some of the creatures born have lots of mutations
    and some have few. If the ones with lots of
    mutations die, then sex purges the species of
    mutations. Since most mutations are harmful, this
    gives sex a great advantage. (imagine cars in a
    junkyard)

34
  • The main defect in Kondrashov's hypothesis is
    that it works too slowly.
  • Pitted against a clone of asexual individuals, a
    sexual population must inevitably be driven
    extinct by the clone's greater productivity,
    unless the clone's genetic drawbacks can appear
    in time.
  • Currently, a great deal of effort is going into
    the testing of this model by measuring the
    deleterious mutation rate, in a range of
    organisms from yeast to mouse. But the answer is
    still not entirely clear.

35
  • In the late 1980s the Red Queen hypothesis
    emerged, and it has been steadily gaining
    popularity.
  • First coined by Leigh Van Valen of the University
    of Chicago, it refers to Lewis Carroll's Through
    the Looking Glass, in which the Red Queen tells
    Alice, "It takes all the running you can do, to
    keep in the same place.
  • This never-ending evolutionary cycle describes
    many natural interactions between hosts and
    disease, or between predators and prey As
    species that live at each other's expense
    coevolve, they are engaged in a constant
    evolutionary struggle for a survival advantage.
  • The cyclical nature of these battles could be the
    key to much of the genetic diversity observed in
    nature. 

36
  • The Parasite Red Queen hypothesis for sex is
    simple Sex is needed to fight disease.
  • Diseases specialize in breaking into cells,
    either to eat them, as fungi and bacteria do, or,
    like viruses, to subvert their genetic machinery
    for the purpose of making new viruses.
  • To do that they use protein molecules that bind
    to other molecules on cell surfaces.
  • The arms races between parasites and their hosts
    are all about these binding proteins. Parasites
    invent new keys hosts change the locks. For if
    one lock is common in one generation, the key
    that fits it will spread like wildfire.
    (frequency dependent selection)

37
  • So you can be sure that it is the very lock not
    to have a few generations later
  • According to the Red Queen hypothesis, sexual
    reproduction persists because it enables host
    species to evolve new genetic defenses against
    parasites that attempt to live off them.
  • W. D. Hamilton
  • (see Hamilton Symposium pdf Ill post tomorrow)

38
  • Sexual species can call on a "library" of locks
    unavailable to asexual species.
  • This library is defined by two terms
    heterozygosity, when an organism carries two
    different forms of a gene
  • and polymorphism, when a population contains
    multiple forms of a gene. Both are lost when a
    lineage becomes inbred
  • What is the function of heterozygosity? In the
    case of sickle cell anemia, the sickle gene helps
    to defeat malaria. So where malaria is common,
    the heterozygotes (those with one normal gene and
    one sickle gene) are better off than the
    homozygotes (those with a pair of normal genes or
    sickle genes) who will suffer from malaria or
    anemia.  

39
  • One of the main proponents of the Red Queen
    hypothesis was the late W. D. Hamilton.
  • In the late 1970s, with the help of two
    colleagues from the University of Michigan,
    Hamilton built a computer model of sex and
    disease, a slice of artificial life
  • It began with an imaginary population of 200
    creatures, some sexual and some asexual. Death
    was random. As expected, the sexual race quickly
    died out.
  • In a game between sex and "asex," asex always
    wins -- other things being equal. That's because
    asexual reproduction is easier, and it's
    guaranteed to pass genes on to one's offspring.

40
  • Next they introduced several species of parasite,
    200 of each, whose power depended on "virulence
    genes" matched by "resistance genes" in the
    hosts.
  • The least resistant hosts and the least virulent
    parasites were killed in each generation.
  • Now the asexual population no longer had an
    automatic advantage -- sex often won the game.
  • It won most often if there were lots of genes
    that determined resistance and virulence in each
    creature.

41
  •   In the model, as resistance genes that worked
    would become more common, then so too would the
    virulence genes. Then those resistance genes
    would grow rare again, followed by the virulence
    genes.
  • As Hamilton put it, "antiparasite adaptations are
    in constant obsolescence.
  • But in contrast to asexual species, the sexual
    species retain unfavored genes for future use.
  • "The essence of sex in our theory," wrote
    Hamilton, "is that it stores genes that are
    currently bad but have promise for reuse. It
    continually tries them in combination, waiting
    for the time when the focus of disadvantage has
    moved elsewhere."

42
  • A host parasite arms race can make sex
    beneficial
  • Hosts resistant to parasite genotype I are
    necessarily susceptible to genotype II, and vice
    versa.
  • As the parasite population evolves in response to
    the hosts, it first selects for hosts resistant
    to parasite genotype I, then for hosts resistant
    to parasite genotype II.
  • Genes for sex ride to high frequency in the
    currently more-fit genotypes they help create.

43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
"Well, in our country," said Alice, still panting
a little, "you'd generally get to somewhere
elseif you ran very fast for a long time, as
we've been doing.""A slow sort of country!" said
the Queen. "Now, here, you see, it takes all the
running you can do, to keep in the same place. If
you want to get somewhere else, you must run at
least twice as fast as that!"
46
If the idea about parasites is right, species
may be seen in essence as guilds of genotypes
committed to free fair exchange of biochemical
technology for parasite exclusion. -Bill
Hamilton
47
Case study IISexual selection, parasites and the
Hamilton Zuk hypothesis
48
  • Why is life so colorful?
  • Many male birds, for example, have showy colors
    that are favored by females
  • The colors are status symbolsbut of what,
    exactly?
  • Does a male peacocka tail help it gather food,
    or avoid predators? 

49
  • It seems a sort of costly way to advertise.
  • The high price is actually the key to
    understanding the information being communicated
  • Impressively adorned males must be the fittest
    of their kind, capable of investing more energy
    into their sexual signals
  • Cheap signals invite cheating

50
  • An honest signal must be costly to produce
  • Called the Handicap Principle by Amotz Zahavi
    honest signals will be ones that are too pricey
    to be acquired by low-quality males, ensuring
    only the best males can invest in such signals
    (flashy sports car, 5000 suit, etc.)
  • But what it meant by low and high quality
    males?

51
  • Hamilton and Zuk suggested that bright colors
    might be a costly (and honest) signal of a robust
    immune system
  • This links showy sexually selected
    characteristics with disease
  • Only males with good genes for parasite
    resistance would be in prime condition to express
    showy colors
  • Sick males (low quality) will look drab in
    comparison

52
  • Various false starts parasite load,
    testosterone, etc.
  • Carotenoids are a family of natural pigments, and
    are often the source of bright colors in animals
  • The pigments can be stored in various tissues,
    and are actually mainly made by plants and algae
  • Theyre acquired through eating plants or eating
    other animals that have eaten plants

53
  • Females finches, guppies, sticklebacks, etc.
    prefer males with brighter carotenoid-based
    coloration
  • It turns out that they are costly. Theyre used
    by the immune system and for detoxification to
    neutralize free radicals
  • They stimulate the proliferation of T and B
    lymphocytes
  • Scarce carotenoids can either be used for
    immunocompetence or showiness and unfit males
    just cant fake it.  

54
  • Why is life so colorful?
  • Many male birds, for example, have showy colors
    that are favored by females
  • Hamilton and Zuk suggested that bright colors
    might be a costly (and honest) signal of a robust
    immune system
  • Scarce carotenoids can either be used for
    immunocompetence or showiness  

55
  • Why is life so colorful?
  • Many male birds, for example, have showy colors
    that are favored by females
  • Hamilton and Zuk suggested that bright colors
    might be a costly (and honest) signal of a robust
    immune system
  • Scarce carotenoids can either be used for
    immunocompetence or showiness  

56
Further reading
For a readable introduction to the Red Queen and
its links to human behavior
57
Further reading
For a brilliant synthesis on the role infectious
disease has played in the unfolding of world
history.
58
Further reading
For some great papers on the role of parasites in
the evolution of sex and sexual selection
59
Further reading
For a nice introduction to some of the best
primary literature in evolutionary biology,
including the Haldane paper on disease
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com