Title: Toward Standardization of Terminology in Anesthesia Information Management Systems
1Toward Standardization of Terminology in
Anesthesia Information Management Systems
Dr. Terri Monk, Dr. Martin Hurrell, Dr. Andrew
Norton Data Dictionary Task Force International
Organization for Terminology in
Anesthesia Representing Anesthesia Patient
Safety Foundation USA Royal College of
Anaesthetists - UK
2Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation
- 1984 - APSF founded
- President - Dr. Ellison C. Pierce
- Patient-centered safety foundation approved by
the ASA - Mission To assure that no patient shall be
harmed by the effects of anesthesia - Emphasis on education and research
- Instrumental in making pulse oximetry
capnography a standard of care
3APSF Commitment to AIMS Systems
The APSF endorses and advocates the use of
automated record keeping in the perioperative
period and the subsequent retrieval and analysis
of that data to improve patient safety
APSF Board of Directors October 2001
4A minor issue
We have lots of information technology we just
dont have any information
5IOTAs Modus Operandi
- Data Dictionary Task Force (DDTF) organized by
APSF in 2001 - In 2002, the DDTF accepted UK members and changed
name to International Organization for
Terminology in Anesthesia (IOTA) - Current work of IOTA
- Model terms for anesthesia information systems
using corps of international experts - Reference storage of resources on a versioning
control system, with web access - Anesthesia Extension Group at SNOMED controls
all new anesthesia terminology in SNOMED CT - Special Interest Group for the Generation of
Anesthesia Standards (SIGGAS) in HL7 to develop
anesthesia record compliant with the CDA
6DDTF/IOTA Organization
U.S. Content Adviser Dr. David Reich
7IOTAs International Work Group
8Why a Formal Terminology?
- To provide effective database analysis
- To enable the effective pooling of data
- To allow predictive modeling
- To allow any sort of deductive reasoning
- Essential for the use of intelligent software
agents
9Anesthesiology what are the drivers ?
- The anesthetic record
- Medico-legal
- On-line document
- Audit research
- Data sharing
- Common record structure to identify clinical
context - Common terminology for aggregation and analysis
- Common model to enable AI applications,
reasoning and decision support
10Foundations for future AIMS
11Scope of the reference set
- All clinically descriptive terms
- Procedure notes, Equipment, Positioning,
Emergencies, Outcomes - Business and Administrative terms
- HCFA notes, Demographic terms, Insurers,
Procedures, Diagnoses - Drug formulary
- Agreed abbreviations, totaling units, (suggested
doses?) - Monitored data
- Agreed monitored data descriptors, abbreviations
- Data Exchange
- HL7, Devices etc
Any text element in an AIMS GUI, database or
data transaction where you might otherwise
have to invent a term to make it work.
12Relevance of a Data Dictionary
13Terminology and Ontology Work in Protégé OWL
- Why use Protégé
- Has a large international user community
- Supports OWL (Web Ontology Language) W3C
recommendation - Has rich support for properties and description
logics (OWL DL) - Has visualisation, versioning plugins reasoners
- Protégé is free
14Protégé OWL front end
15The Schema Defines the Structure for Well-Formed
Anesthesia XML Documents
16 Vital Signs modeled in CDA
17The Promise - Sharing of Information
Hospital A
Hospital B
- Portability of records
- Outcomes research
- Knowledge
- The pre-emptive use of Information
Hospital C
18How Should Future Standardization of Anesthesia
Information Progress?
- 2 options
- Continue to work on the terminology with SNOMED
and the record schema in HL7 - Bring the completed (or near completed work) to
the appropriate ISO group and ask it to adopt
the work as a standard. - 2. Join an ISO technical committee? If so, which
one?
19THE END