Reinhard Busse, Prof' Dr' med' MPH FFPH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Reinhard Busse, Prof' Dr' med' MPH FFPH

Description:

Decision-making: the link between reference pricing and procurement ... only one component of a broader 'service package' to implant or adapt the ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: mei120
Category:
Tags: ffph | mph | busse | med | prof | ray | reinhard

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reinhard Busse, Prof' Dr' med' MPH FFPH


1
Decision-making the link between reference
pricing and procurement
  • Reinhard Busse, Prof. Dr. med. MPH FFPH
  • Dept. Health Care Management, Berlin University
    of Technology(WHO Collaborating Centre for
    Health Systems Research and Management), European
    Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
    European Health Technology Institute on
    Socio-Economic Research

2
Relationships between patients, payers,
providers, manufacturers and distributors of
medical devices
Third party payer
Regulator
Reimbursement for goods and/or services
premium/contribution/taxes
Patient
Service Provider
Cost sharing
Purchasing/ procurement of goods
Manufacturer
Goods Distributor
3
  • First observation complicated relationships,
    varying among medical technologies (and
    countries)
  • Second observation complicated/ confusing
    terminology What is procurement? What is price?
    What is reference price? Does it refer to
    reimbursement or procurement?

4
Structure of medical device technologies
medical technologies

Category Imedical aids
Category IIIassistance forprofessionals
Category II artificial body parts
standard products which are prescribed and given
to an individual patient
medical devices which stay ator in the patient
(e.g. knee endoprostheses, stents) only one
component of a broader service package to
implant or adapt the (hardware) product to the
individual patient
technical equipment supporting professionals in
diagnostics and/or treatment with two-stage
financing
In-between category I-IImedical aids
withlarge service component(e.g.
exo-prostheses)
  • IIIa investment
  • IIIb refinancing via use (diagnostics/treatmen
    t)

Chosen technologies
  • knee (endo-)prostheses
  • ICD
  • coronary stents
  • endoscope (for e.g. gastroscopy)
  • operating room equipment
  • imaging devices X-ray, CT, MRI
  • incontinence pads

implants
Note underlined technologies are part of the
first part of the project
5
Relationships between patients, payers,
providers, manufacturers and distributors of
medical devices
Third party payer
II
III b
Reimbursement for goods and/or services
premium/contribution/taxes
III b
II
Patient
Service Provider
III a
(investment)
Cost sharing
I
II
Purchasing/ procurement of goods
I
Manufacturer
I
Goods Distributor
Note the numbers I, II, IIIa and IIIb refer to
the technology categories in previous figure
6
But the world of medical devices is more complex
Licensing decision
Coverage decision
Reimbursement decision
7
Licensing decision in the EU
Coverage decision
Reimbursement decision
8
Coverage decision in the EU
Licensing decision
Reimbursement decision
9
How is the benefit basket structured? What is the
taxonomy? How explicit is it?
10
(No Transcript)
11
Decisions on coverage of medical devices
medical technologies

Category Imedical aids
Category IIIassistance forprofessionals
Category II artificial body parts
standard products which are prescribed and given
to an individual patient
medical devices which stay ator in the patient
(e.g. knee endoprostheses, stents) only one
component of a broader service package to
implant or adapt the (hardware) product to the
individual patient
Large emphasis onHTA, typically
forindication/service/productcombination
technical equipment supporting professionals in
diagnostics and/or treatment with two-stage
financing
Service(not product)is focusof HTA
LittleHTA
  • IIIa investment
  • IIIb refinancing via use (diagnostics/treatmen
    t)

Limitations toparticular patients, productsor
service providerspossible
Chosen technologies
  • knee (endo-)prostheses
  • ICD
  • coronary stents
  • endoscope (for e.g. gastroscopy)
  • operating room equipment
  • imaging devices X-ray, CT, MRI
  • incontinence pads

implants
12
Reimbursement decision in the EU
Licensing decision
Coverage decision
13
Reimbursement of medical device technologies
medical technologies

Category Imedical aids
Category IIIassistance forprofessionals
Category II artificial body parts
standard products which are prescribed and given
to an individual patient
medical devices which stay ator in the patient
(e.g. knee endoprostheses, stents) only one
component of a broader service package to
implant or adapt the (hardware) product to the
individual patient
Benefit service,reimbursement includes
product and/or is complementedby
additionalpayment if expensive(UK, F, partly
I)or innovative (D)
technical equipment supporting professionals in
diagnostics and/or treatment with two-stage
financing
Product constitutes benefit,i.e.
reimbursementfor product,possibly limited
by reference price (RP)
Benefits different serviceswith
reimbursementusually unrelatedto priceof
technology
  • IIIa investment
  • IIIb refinancing via use (diagnostics/treatmen
    t)

RP necessitatesa proper differentiationof
products
DRG/ additionalpayments necessitateproper
differentiation
Chosen technologies
  • knee (endo-)prostheses
  • ICD
  • coronary stents
  • endoscope (for e.g. gastroscopy)
  • operating room equipment
  • imaging devices X-ray, CT, MRI
  • incontinence pads

implants
14
Reimbursementof medical aids in Germany
  • Sickness funds shall implement public tenders for
    standardized products
  • Sickness funds shall conclude contracts for
    further products
  • Sickness funds shall conclude individual
    contracts for products with high service
    intensity (e.g. exoprostheses)
  • For certain categories of products, RPs exist. If
    contracts based on tenders are concluded for
    these categories, these RPs serve as maximum
    prices.

15
Relationships between patients, payers,
providers, manufacturers and distributors of
medical devices
Third party payer
Publictenders
Reimbursement for goods and/or services
premium/contribution/taxes
RPs
Patient
Service Provider
Cost sharing
I
Purchasing/ procurement of goods
I
Manufacturer
I
Goods Distributor
16
Reference pricesfor medical aids in Germany
  • There are reference prices (RPs) for 6 out of 33
    categories of medical aids
  • RPs serve as a reimbursement limit
  • Products are grouped in homogeneous classes for
    each group, reference prices are set (based on
    current market)
  • Manufacturers have a voice in this process
  • Patients have to make co-payments
  • Patients are free to choose any product with a
    price higher than the RP if they are willing to
    pay the difference between the actual selling
    price and the RP

17
Reference prices forIncontinence Pads in Germany
(Version Bundesanzeiger No. 170, 11.09.2007)
18
Reference prices forIncontinence Pads in Spain
19
Reference pricesfor medical aids in Germany
  • There are reference prices (RPs) for 6 out ot 33
    categories of medical aids
  • RPs serve as a reimbursement limit
  • Products are grouped in homogeneous classes for
    each group, reference prices are set (based on
    current market)
  • Manufacturers have a voice in this process
  • Patients have to make co-payments
  • Patients are free to choose any product with a
    price higher than the RP if they are willing to
    pay the difference between the actual selling
    price and the RP

20
Medical Aids Expenditures from public sources
under the German RP regime
Incontinence aids
21
Number of DRGs/HRGsfor particular devices
22
Innovative devices knee endoprostheses and
coronary stents in Germany
NUB-Procedures Includes 2 types of stents
hospital-specific prices
Includes modular knee endoprostheses and
certain types of stents hospital-specific prices
Includes both technologies in various DRG
national uniform cost weights
Effects on diffusionof innovation? -gt
work-in-progressof TUB team
Figure Reimbursement Components of Inpatient
Care in Germany (Schreyögg J, Tiemann O, Busse R
(2006) Cost accounting to determine prices How
well do prices reflect costs in the German
DRG-system? Health Care Manage Sci 9269-279.
With own adaptations and extensions)
23
Relationships between patients, payers,
providers, manufacturers and distributors of
medical devices
Third party payer
Reimbursement for goods and/or services
premium/contribution/taxes
Patient
Service Provider
RPs
Publictenders
Cost sharing
Purchasing/ procurement of goods
Manufacturer
Goods Distributor
24
Purchasing/ procurement criteriafor medical
device technologies
medical technologies

Category Imedical aids
Category IIIassistance forprofessionals
Category II artificial body parts
standard products which are prescribed and given
to an individual patient
medical devices which stay ator in the patient
(e.g. knee endoprostheses, stents) only one
component of a broader service package to
implant or adapt the (hardware) product to the
individual patient
Price
HTA dimensions effectiveness,cost-effectiveness

technical equipment supporting professionals in
diagnostics and/or treatment with two-stage
financing
Perceived degreeof innovation and quality
  • IIIa investment
  • IIIb refinancing via use (diagnostics/treatmen
    t)

Chosen technologies
  • knee (endo-)prostheses
  • ICD
  • coronary stents
  • endoscope (for e.g. gastroscopy)
  • operating room equipment
  • imaging devices X-ray, CT, MRI
  • incontinence pads

implants
Note underlined technologies are part of the
first part of the project
25
Purchasing/ procurement developmentsfor medical
device technologies
  • Individual purchasing the rule (but with hospital
    groups gaining power) France, Germany
  • From national to coordinated group purchasing UK
  • Mixture of individual and regional purchasing
    with national regulation (RPs! but different
    type) Italy

26
  • In conclusion
  • knowing about the limitations or this analysis
  • we need to develop/ use common framework to
    understand what we are talking about when using
    the same terms
  • collect data on effects on patient outcomes,
    diffusion of innovation, costs
  • have a dia- or rather trialogue (academics/
    industry/ politicians)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com