Checklists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Checklists

Description:

Increased emphasis on self-reflection and self-assessment. Individual students ... giftedness and poor social adjustment. 11/20/09. Observation Checklists. 21 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: glenha
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Checklists


1
Checklists Rating Scales
  • Scoring Performances
  • Modified from original presentation byGlen
    Hammond, RRC, CAE, CIE

2
Goals
  • To explore the importance of
  • grading performance appropriately
  • understanding, spotting, compensating for usual
    errors
  • appropriately using
  • checklists
  • rating scales

3
(No Transcript)
4
Principles of Effective Rating
  • Characteristics should be
  • educationally significant
  • in harmony with vision, goals, objectives,
    outcomes.
  • directly observable
  • occur in the setting
  • clearly visible to an observer (skills easier
    than interests, feelings, attitudes)

5
Checklists and Rating Scales
  • MONITORING and RECORD-KEEPING devices
  • Increased emphasis on self-reflection and
    self-assessment
  • Individual students
  • assess their own progress
  • develop an improvement plan

6
Checklists Rating Scales
  • Checklist Attitude Yes or No
  • shows originality Yes No
  • respects own work Yes No
  • is easily motivated Yes No
  • Rating Scale Attitude -- Degree
  • shows originality SA A U D SD
  • respects own work SA A U D SD
  • is easily motivated SA A U D SD
  • (SA Strongly Agree A Agree U Undecided D
    Disagree SD Strongly Disagree)

7
Constructing Checklists
  • Base on course objectives.
  • State in clear and precise terms.
  • Avoid generalities focus on specifics.
  • Write to be easily understood by the student.
  • can be basis for instructor/student discussion.
  • allows for self- and peer-evaluation.

8
Constructing Checklists
  • Keep short - focus on a few specifics.
  • Can be used
  • for single evaluation or cumulative record
  • for diagnostic, formative, summative evaluation
  • as a basis for anecdotal comment
  • as instructional tool for learner to follow in
    practicing the skill.

9
Differentiating Assessment Tools
  • CHECKLISTS
  • psychomotor social skills
  • indicate presence or absence/mastery or
    non-mastery of skill
  • may indicate sequence of actions in a performance
  • RATING SCALES
  • for psychomotor and affective skills
  • indicate quality, degree, or frequency of skill
    or trait
  • useful in summarizing general impressions

10
Checklist Preparation for Varnishing
  • __ sands and prepares surface properly
  • __ wipes dust from surface
  • __ selects appropriate brush
  • __ selects varnish and checks varnish flow
  • __ pours needed amount of varnish into clean
    container

11
Rating Scale Job Attitude
  • is enthusiastic G Av N Imp
  • is willing to work cooperate G Av N Imp
  • desires to improve G Av N Imp
  • is a good team worker G Av N Imp
  • is concerned with safety G Av N Imp
  • works without supervision G Av N Imp
  • aware of job requirements G Av N Imp

12
Why Use Observation Checklists
  • Quick and easy
  • Record skills/behaviors rarely assessed prior to
    summative exam
  • Can show areas that need work, early
  • can help and correct before student failure
  • Provide opportunities to change gears
  • Desired behaviour can be identified, taught, and
    checked.

13
Why Use Observation Checklists
  • Focus on what is observable
  • Useful for monitoring growth or need for
    improvement
  • More meaningful and authentic
  • Identify learners level and needs

14
Why Use Observation Checklists
  • Useful to
  • discover patterns
  • assess progress
  • make plans to help students continue their
    learning.

15
Rating Scale Basics
  • Use for psychomotor and affective domains
  • give quality, frequency, degree, or level
    information
  • for processes or products

16
Principles of Effective Rating
  • Characteristics points clearly defined
  • 3 to 7 rating positions
  • Combine ratings from several observers whenever
    possible (greater reliability)
  • omit ratings you feel unqualified to judge

17
Sample Rating Scale Degree of Confidence
  • 1 little or no 2 some 3 great confidence
  • inquiry teaching 1 2 3
  • instructional modules 1 2 3
  • simulations 1 2 3
  • lecture 1 2 3
  • leading a discussion 1 2 3
  • questioning 1 2 3

18
Rating Scale Limitations
  • Bias leniency, strictness, modesty, halo effect
  • Social expectations (faking/self-deception)
  • Interpretation
  • Criterion inadequacy

19
Common Errors in Rating
  • Personal Biastendency to rate all at
    approximately the same position on the scale
  • generosity error - rates all at high end
  • severity error rates all at low end
  • central tendency error rates all as average

20
Common Errors in Rating
  • Halo Effectgeneral impression influences the
    rating of individual characteristics
  • Logical Error two characteristics incorrectly
    related
  • intelligence and achievement
  • giftedness and poor social adjustment

21
Common Errors in Rating
  • Raters Attitude
  • Rating unimportant, not enough effort
  • Not enough time allocated
  • Insufficient opportunities for observation.

22
Precautions/Considerations
  • Begin with a blueprint of the behaviours
  • ensure valid sampling within the area
  • Clearly define traits
  • Use most behavioural description possible
  • Divide the rating continuum
  • Use as many points as needed for clarity
  • usually between three and seven.

23
Precautions/Considerations
  • Clearly define anchors on continuum
  • No question as to what each rating means
  • Train and motivate the raters
  • Stress accuracy and objectivity

24
Defining Steps on a Scale
  • Numeric anchors
  • numbers, often accompanied by verbal cues
  • Degree of Agreement anchors
  • Completely Disagree to Completely Agree
  • Never to Always
  • Adjectival anchors
  • Bipolar adjective endpoints with numbers in
    between
  • valuable 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 worthless
  • passive 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 active

25
What is QUALITY?
  • If something occurred
  • occasionally, it would occur __ of the time.
  • sometimes, it would occur __ of the time
  • frequently, it would occur __ of the time
  • usually, it would occur __ of the time
  • often, it would occur __ of the time

26
Overcoming Problems
  • Proper design, training, and use of the scales.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com