Going Forward: Year 2 NMI and Higher Ed Middleware - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Going Forward: Year 2 NMI and Higher Ed Middleware

Description:

NMI-EDIT. Participation and Resources. Websites. NMI: nsf-middleware.org ... EDIT Team anticipates Shibboleth 1.0 (RM 0.5,ARPManager 0.5), eduOrg, Pubcookie ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Inter54
Learn more at: http://www.internet2.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Going Forward: Year 2 NMI and Higher Ed Middleware


1
Going ForwardYear 2 NMI and Higher Ed Middleware
2
Agenda
  • Assessment of CAMP
  • Assessment of processes
  • web site, email lists, virtual briefings,
    meetings (session and preconference options)
  • Going Forward
  • NMI Year 2
  • Higher Ed Middleware
  • Take-aways

3
NMI-EDIT Participation and Resources
  • Websites
  • NMI nsf-middleware.org
  • NMI-EDIT www.nmi-edit.org
  • Internet2middleware.internet2.edu
  • EDUCAUSE www.educause.edu
  • Refer to the websites for more information on
    email lists
  • Education and Workshops
  • CAMPs
  • Presentations and tutorials
  • Working groups
  • Renee Frost (rwfrost_at_internet2.edu)
  • participation_at_nmi-edit.org
  • Questions, requests, comments
  • Ann West (awest_at_educause.edu)

4
CAMP Assessment
  • Content
  • too lofty/pretty fine/too detailed
  • too intense/fine/more
  • too immediate/fine/too long range
  • political/technical balance
  • Format
  • panels? Presentations? Hand waving? Others?
    break into workgroups?
  • bofs?
  • Facilities
  • location (global, local)
  • wireless

5
Process Assessment
  • web site (public and private/shared)
  • email lists
  • virtual briefings
  • meetings (session and preconference options)
  • Other ideas?
  • Volunteer mechanisms

6
Going Forward
  • NMI
  • Higher Ed Middleware
  • Virtual Organizations identifier crosswalks,
    etc
  • PKI - HEBCA, CREN CA, S/MIME, SEVIS
  • GGF what role for the enterprise? (security,
    accounting)
  • Shibboleth 1.0 and FOO
  • Upperware video, DRM, common calendars
  • Affiliated directories
  • AuthZ
  • Centralized Services

7
NMI The Process
  • Releases approximately every six months next
    one (Release 2) Oct 27, 2002
  • Will continue to be a mix of software (programs
    and objectclasses), good practices and
    recommendations, and architectural whitepapers
  • May be an opportunity to announce services
    (bridge CAs, registries, etc.) as well
  • GridsCenter anticipates some (relatively modest)
    enhancements to Globus Toolkit 2.0, no OGSA
  • EDIT Team anticipates Shibboleth 1.0 (RM
    0.5,ARPManager 0.5), eduOrg, Pubcookie 3.0, LDAP
    Analyzer, Architectural Papers in Video, Digital
    Rights Management, etc.
  • Integration? Leveraging Campus Infrastructure in
    Grids?

8
Objectclasses in R2
  • eduPerson 1.5 final
  • eduOrg 1.0 final, eduOrg 1.5 experimental
  • VoDendPoint 1.0 experimental
  • Status of docs
  • draft in the works, grist for the mill
  • experimental consensus by work group (e.g.
    Mace-dir)
  • rpr released for public review vetted fully
    within I2 community
  • final as good as it gets (international,
    corporate, broader higher ed commentary)

9
Virtual Organizations
  • Grid experiments, digital library consortiums,
    Internet2 VideoCommons, etc.
  • Share real (realm-based) resources among a sparse
    set of (interrealm) users
  • Requirements for authentication and
    authorization, resource discovery, etc need to
    leverage federated and hierarchical
    infrastructures.

10
Support services for VOs
  • Centralized
  • unique vo names and associated namespaces,
    objectclasses required
  • trust model items (cert profiles, roots, etc.)
  • At origin enterprises
  • enterprise-wide app directories
  • local security to vo security
  • local directory mods
  • At the target enterprises
  • agency requirements

11
PKI
  • SEVIS
  • HEBCA next steps
  • CREN CA next steps
  • S/MIME
  • Server side issues
  • Open-Source CAs

12
Global Grid Forum
  • Is GGF a standards organization for us?
  • a way to internationalize academic objclasses,
    PKI enablement, etc.
  • Is GGF a standards organization against us?
  • security? accounting? web services?
  • Is GGF a standards organization?
  • can it be effective? can it define appropriate
    scope?
  • What will we do if a Grid lands on campus?

13
Shibboleth 1.0 and FOO
  • Pilots start almost immediately
  • Next three months
  • Completion of coding, security testing,
    performance enhancements, monitoring tools
  • Serious work on resource managers and attribute
    release managers
  • Architecting a fuller vision of resource
    managers and attribute management
  • Shib 1.0
  • FOO (federating organizations organization) to
    discuss the hard issues of multiple federations,
    subclubs, implementation, etc.

14
Upperware
  • Video
  • slowness in H.323 land
  • a coming to grips in SIP space
  • open clients and proxies
  • DRM
  • the workshop
  • an architectural white paper in the fall
  • Common calendars? Portals? OKI?

15
Got AuthZ?
  • Role-based group-implemented access controls
  • promote the Stanford work
  • An enhanced model of the target side
  • PDP
  • PEP
  • policy languages
  • rights languages
  • etc

16
What Centralized Services are Needed?
  • A Sector CA?
  • Higher Ed Bridge CA?
  • Cert stores?
  • UDDI host?
  • Name Spaces? For what names (docs, attributes,
  • Registries
  • for Clubs
  • for Virtual Organizations
  • for Objectclasses

17
Take-aways
  • Wireless authn/z done via forcing a web browser
    to a DMZ net
  • Server-side PKI to solve immediate needs and get
    our feet wet
  • El Dupe not yet dead
  • Flashing twelves can drive a training curve
  • Shib is gaining traction in the library community
  • State diagrams and transition rules for account
    management are excellent tools
  • IPSEC and VPNs in the wireless space
  • End-entity PKI still not nigh
  • Identity Management falls to those that need IT
  • File sharing needs are still strong
  • Pay for printing is a rat hole

18
Takeaways
  • Librarians like us and we like them cause they
    understand and promote privacy
  • sampleUperson installed in many places
  • RBAC is viable and a win
  • Registries and underlying databases help the
    management of directories
  • The community remains interested and committed.
  • Were not telling the story well
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com