Charles Darwin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Charles Darwin

Description:

In common usage, an explanation is a statement made to clarify something and ... Migration, Drift, Non-random Mating/Inbreeding. Evolution at Multiple Loci ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:25
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: CalS158
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Charles Darwin


1
Charles Darwin Natural Selection Scientific
Ways of Knowing
  • Dr. Paul Narguizian
  • Associate Professor of Biological Sciences
  • California State University, Los Angeles
  • Email pnargui_at_calstatela.edu
  • Web Page http//www.calstatela.edu/faculty/pnargu
    i/

2
What is a Scientific Explanation?
3
The Sciences
  • Biology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Earth and Space Science

4
What is a Scientific Explanation?
  • In common usage, an explanation is a statement
    made to clarify something and make it
    understandable. In science, explanation means
    something more concrete. Scientific explanations
    consist of three specific parts claims,
    evidence, and reasoning.

5
What is a Scientific Explanation?
  • A claim is an assertion or conclusion that
    answers the original question.
  • Evidence is scientific data that supports the
    students/scientists claim. It must be
    appropriate and sufficient. It can come from an
    investigation or other source, such as
    observations, reading material, or archived data.

6
What is a Scientific Explanation?
  • Reasoning is the justification that links the
    claim and evidence. It shows why the data counts
    as evidence to support the claim, using
    appropriate scientific principles.

7
Scientific Hypothesis, Law, and Theory
  • What is a Hypothesis?
  • What is a Law?
  • What is a Theory?

8
Scientific Fact
  • Fact In science, an observation that has been
    repeatedly confirmed (NRC, 1998).

9
Scientific Hypothesis
  • Hypothesis A testable statement about the
    natural world that can be used to build more
    complex inferences and explanations (NRC, 1998).
  • A hypothesis in the classroom setting usually
    involves a prediction followed by an explanation.

10
Scientific Law vs. Theory
  • In the language of science, laws and theories are
    related but distinct kinds of scientific
    knowledge.

11
Scientific Law
  • Law A descriptive generalization about how some
    aspect of the natural world behaves under stated
    circumstances (NRC, 1998). Laws include
    predictions made about natural phenomena.

12
Scientific Theory
  • Theory A well-substantiated explanation/mechanism
    of some aspect of the natural world that can
    incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested
    hypotheses (NRC, 1998). Theories explain how the
    law works (McComas, 2003). Scientific theories
    are explanations that are based on lines of
    evidence, enable valid predictions, and have been
    scientifically tested in many ways.

13
Scientific Law vs. Theory
  • Sonleitner, (1989) makes the point that theory
    and law, are qualitatively different in what they
    are and what they do. He states that laws are
    generalizations about phenomena while theories
    are explanations of phenomena.
  • Theory and law are not distinguished by their
    degree of verification.

14
Laws and Theories
  • The Law of Biological Evolution
  • The Theory of Natural Selection

15
Biological Evolution Defined
  • Biological Evolution is defined as the change in
    allele frequencies (where alleles are versions of
    the same gene that differ in their base sequence)
    within populations (Freeman and Herron, 2004).

16
Biological Evolution Defined
  • Biological Evolution the changes in the genetic
    composition of a population with the passage of
    each generation (Volpe Rosenbaum, 2000).

17
Natural Selection Defined
  • Natural Selection is defined as the process in
    nature that causes evolution through differential
    reproductive success among members of a
    population that success depends on genetically
    based and heritable variation in characteristics
    that confer relative advantage or disadvantage to
    the bearer (Price, 1996).

18
Natural Selection Defined
  • Natural Selection is defined as those individuals
    in a population that (genetically) are better
    able to survive and reproduce in a particular
    environment leave more offspring, which in turn
    carry a higher frequency of genes promoting
    adaptation to that environment (Scott, 2005).

19
Laws and Theories
  • The Law of Biological Evolution
  • The Theory of Natural Selection

20
Evolution vs. Intelligent Design
21
(No Transcript)
22
Physics and the Looming Crisis of String TheoryI
Mean String Hypothesis???
23
The Origin of Life vs. The Origin of Species and
Other Misconceptions
Alfred R. Wallace
24
Mechanisms of Biological Evolution
  • The main but certainly not the only mechanism
    of biological evolution is natural selection
    (Scott, 2005).
  • Others include
  • Mutation and Genetic Variation
  • Mendelian Population Genetics
  • Selection and mutation
  • Mendelian Population Genetics
  • Migration, Drift, Non-random Mating/Inbreeding
  • Evolution at Multiple Loci
  • Linkage, sex, and quantitative genetics

25
Laws and Theories
  • Laws consist primarily as statements or
    generalizations made about natural phenomena.
  • Theories, however, consist of the explanation/
    mechanism for how the law works (McComas, 2003).
    Scientific theories are explanations that are
    based on lines of evidence, enable valid
    predictions, and have been scientifically tested
    in many ways.
  • Examples? Cell Theory?

26
James Watsons Definition
  • Let us not beat around the bush the common
    assumption that evolution through natural
    selection is a theory in the same way as string
    theory is a theory, is wrong. Evolution is a Law
    that is well substantiated as any other natural
    law, whether the Law of Gravity, the Laws of
    Motion or Avogadros Law. Evolution is a fact,
    disputed only by those who choose to ignore the
    evidence, put their common sense on hold, and
    believe instead that unchanging knowledge and
    wisdom can be reached only by revelation.
  • James D. Watson (2005). Darwin the Indelible
    Stamp
  • The Evolution Of An Idea.

27
(No Transcript)
28
Evolution Websites
  • Evolution and the Nature of Science
  • http//www.indiana.edu/ensiweb/
  • The main objective of ENSI is to improve the
    teaching of evolution in High School Biology
    courses by encouraging teachers to teach
    evolutionary thinking in the context of a more
    complete understanding of modern scientific
    thinking.

29
Evolution Websites
  • University of California Museum of Paleontology
    at UC Berkeley and the National Center for
    Science Education
  • http//evolution.berkeley.edu/
  • This is a good website for topics that explore
    evolution content and the NOS.

30
Evolution Websites
  • University of California Museum of Paleontology
    at UC Berkeley and the National Center for
    Science Education
  • http//undsci.berkeley.edu/
  • This is a good website for topics that explore
    lassroom activities, teaching tools, a K-16
    conceptual framework, tips, and strategies for
    integrating the process of science into your
    teaching, and more.

31
A Responsibility
  • These and numerous other questions regarding
    scientific ways of knowing can serve as an ideal
    tool for students and teachers of science alike
    within courses such as biology, chemistry,
    physics, and the earth sciences to unite the
    sciences and reveal the fact that all of the
    aforementioned sciences use a similar
    methodology.  

32
References
  • Allen, G. and J. Baker. 2001. Biology Scientific
    Process and Social Issues. Bethesda, Md.
    Fitzgerald Science Press, Inc.
  • Bybee, R. W. (Ed.) 2004. Evolution in
    Perspective The Science Teachers Compendium.
    Arlington, VA NSTA Press.
  • Campbell, N.A., Reece, J.B., and Mitchell, L.G.
    1999. Biology (5th ed.). Menlo Park, CA Benjamin
    Cummings.
  • Darwin, C. 1964. On the Origin of Species
    (Facsimile 1st ed.). Cambridge, MA Harvard
    University Press.
  • Freeman, S. Herron, J.C. 2004. Evolutionary
    analysis (3rd. Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ
    Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Gould, J.A. 1992. Classical Philosophical
    Questions. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.
    Prentice Hall.
  • Miller, K.R. 2006. Presentation. NSTA Conference.
    Anaheim, CA.
  • Miller, K. R. 1999. Finding Darwins God. New
    York, NY Harper Collins.
  • Narguizian, P. 2004. Understanding the nature of
    science through evolution. The Science Teacher
    71(9) 40-45.
  • National Academy of Sciences. (2004). Evolution
    in Hawaii A Supplement to Teaching About
    Evolution and the Nature of Science, by Steve
    Olson. Washington, DC The National Academies
    Press.
  • National Research Council. 1996. National Science
    Education Standards. Washington, DC National
    Academy Press.
  • Pennock, R.T. (2005). On teaching evolution and
    the nature of science. In J. Cracraft R.W.
    Bybee (Eds.), Evolutionary science and society
    Educating a new generation (pp.7-12). Washington,
    DC AIBS/BSCS.
  • Peterson, G. R. 2002. The intelligent design
    movement Science or ideology? Zygon 37(1) 7-23.
  • Price, P.W. (1996). Biological evolution. New
    York Saunders College Publishing.
  • Scott, E.C. (2005). Evolution vs. creationism.
    Berkeley, CA University of California Press.
  • University of California Museum of Paleontology
    at UC Berkeley and the National Center for
    Science Education evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/
    evohome.html
  • Volpe, E.P. Rosenbaum, P.A. (2000).
    Understanding evolution. New York McGraw Hill.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com