RFC 3775 bis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

RFC 3775 bis

Description:

Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping in Split Scenario. draft-ietf-mip6 ... Deprecates site-local IPv6 addresses. RFC4193. Defines unique-local IPv6 routable addresses ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: ietf
Learn more at: https://www.ietf.org
Category:
Tags: rfc | bis | deprecates

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: RFC 3775 bis


1
RFC 3775 bis
  • Julien Laganier, Marcelo Bagnulo
  • MEXT WG chairs
  • IETF-71
  • Philadelphia, PA, USA
  • March 2008

2
Outline
  • Issue 1
  • Issue 2
  • Etc.

3
1 Last Accepted SQN
  • Allow HA or CN to tell MN last accepted SQN?
  • New functionality
  • ? out-of-scope for 3775bis

4
2 Removing DHAAD
  • RFC 5026
  • Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping in Split Scenario
  • draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping-integrated
  • MIP6-bootstrapping for the Integrated Scenario
  • Remove DHAAD?
  • Change of functionality
  • out-of-scope for 3775bis
  • Document security considerations?
  • Some ISPs filter ICMPv6
  • DHAAD is unauthenticated
  • Recommend to use bootstrapping procedures

5
3 BRR, BErr sent by HA
  • Currently only CN can send BRR/BErr
  • Allow HA to send BRR/BErr?
  • Change of functionality
  • out-of-scope for 3775bis

6
4 Remove site-local refs
  • RFC3879
  • Deprecates site-local IPv6 addresses
  • RFC4193
  • Defines unique-local IPv6 routable addresses
  • s/site-local/unique-local?
  • Not an extension
  • About consistency with other IETF specs
  • ? in-of-scope for 3775bis

7
6 Returning Home
  • RFC 3775
  • Not clear whether MN returning home send a
    de-registration BU
  • SHOULD is used
  • Confusion for PMIPv6 MIPv6 interactions doc
  • BU with home address set to CoA treated as a
    de-registration BU
  • Assume BU sent with HoA as source address is sent
    from the home link
  • DS-MIPv6
  • BU sent with HoA as source address
  • IPv4 CoA option or outer IPv4 header carries
    actual CoA
  • Update RFC3775 to make it consistent with
    DS-MIPv6 behavior?
  • ? in-of-scope for 3775bis

8
7 MH Checksum Calculation
  • Next Header in pseudo-header set to 2 for
    checksum calculation
  • Should have been 135 (Mobility Header)
  • This is an interop issue that needs to be fixed
  • Update RFC3775 to fix next header value?
  • ? in-of-scope for 3775bis

9
8, 9 MISC
  • Minor issues we can discuss here
  • Can the HA send a Binding Error message with
    status 1 ever, or is it the CN only?
  • Clarify text in section 11.7.3 that describes MN
    behavior in response to binding ack with status
    135
  • Sending ICMP error to the MN in response to a BU
    sent from the home link
  • What is the HA response for a malformed or
    invalid mobility option?
  • ICMP parameter problem error needs to be sent
    this is not specified
  • Relax the requirement to use a unicast address as
    the source address in DHAAD reply -- Anycast
    address can also be used as the source address
  • Does any of those of makes sense?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com