Title: 4D Analysis in Radiation Oncology: The Implications for Adaptive Lung Cancer Therapy Checkpoint
14D Analysis in Radiation Oncology The
Implications for Adaptive Lung Cancer
Therapy Checkpoint
- Project Leader Ashkon Shaahinfar
- Mentors Dr. Eric Ford Dr. Todd McNutt
2Today Radiation Therapy
- General practice of using free-breathing planning
CT (breath-hold used at JHMI) - Therapy is based on day 0 CT throughout treatment
3Future Adaptive Radiation Therapy
- Advantages
- Improved geometric coverage of tumor via repeated
CT and breath-hold CT - Subsequent ability to ? volume of dose and ?
integral dose to tumor - Implications
- TODAY 2-year local control for NSCLC
- Stage 1 and 2 ? 50 Stage 3 ? 20
- Potential for Improvement
- Stage 1 and 2 ? 82 Stage 3 ? 50
4Goals
- Conduct a proof of concept study with Pinnacle
treatment planning software and existing patient
data. - Show quantitatively that breath-hold CT is
preferable to the free-breathing method - Show quantitatively that repeated CT is
preferable to single CT - Provide efficient means of conducting analyses
Original, Revised
5Progress 4D-CT Tumor Motion Analysis
6Deliverables Minimum
- Revised
- Learn to use Pinnacle software
- Quantify respiratory motion at day 0. Compare
with all days n (where data is available). (3
patients) - Develop MatLab program for automated motion
visualization / analysis
- Original
- Learn to use Pinnacle software
- Quantify respiratory motion at day 0. Compare
with all days n (where data is available). (4-5
patients)
7Deliverables Expected
- Revised
- Quantify and compare the envelope of 4D volume
(estimate of free-breathing treatment volume)
with breath-hold treatment volume. Conduct
geometric comparison analysis. (3
patients) - Quantify evolution of lung tumor volume through
the course of (30 days) treatment. Conduct
geometric comparison analysis of treatment plan
volume and tumor volume. (3 patients) -
8Deliverables Maximum
- Revised
- Assess advantages of breath-hold (as compared to
free-breathing) through dosimetric
quantifications and comparisons. - Assess advantages of geometric margin reduction
and increased geometric accuracy through
dosimetric quantifications and comparisons. - Develop Java-based software for 4D viewing
(respiratory motion animation) of DICOM images
(removed) ? an expected deliverable of Donalds
group
9Updated Project Timeline
Original, Revised
Complete Reading List Learn Pinnacle
software 4D-CT, day 0, patient 1 4D-CT, day 0-n,
4 (3) patients Develop MatLab program FB vs. BH
geometric, all patients Repeated CT geometric,
all pts. Dosimetric analyses
3/6/06
3/27/06
4/10/06
3/13/06
4/7/06
4/28/06
5/5/06
10Dependencies
Original, Updated
- Pinnacle software resolved (learned to use
Pinnacle) - Radiation Oncology Dept. access I arrive between
8 am and 5 pm on weekdays - Access to dedicated computer workstation (for
storage of results, etc) Pinnacle system
available second workstation available but
software still unlicensed (Dr. McNutt will
license) - Patient data (repeated CT and 4D CT) data is
made available on Dr. Fords computer maintain
contact with Dr. Ford as needed to ensure data is
placed in a location available to me
11Preliminary Results Excel Centroid Graphs
- Relative Displacement of GTV Centroid through
Respiratory Phases (Patient 1)
12Preliminary Results pt1rescan1.jpg MatLab
Visualization Software Output
13Preliminary Results MatLab Visualization
Program Complete
- FUNCTION SPECIFICATION
- main(patientNum, scanName), calls --gt
- Data Input
- numPoints getNumPoints(fileName)
- dataAllPhases readVTK(fileName)
- Post-input processing
- dataAllPhases centerData(dataAllPhases),
calls getCentroid - Calculation
- centroid getCentroid(dataAllPhases)
- centroid, trajMaxXPoints, trajMinXPoints,
trajMaxYPoints, trajMinYPionts, trajMaxZPoints,
trajMinZPoints getTrajectories(dataAllPhases)
14Questions?
- Thank you for your attention.