The Weathering of Nickeldoped Silicate Glass in Anaerobic Groundwater Microcosms - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

The Weathering of Nickeldoped Silicate Glass in Anaerobic Groundwater Microcosms

Description:

... Weathering of Nickel-doped Silicate Glass in Anaerobic Groundwater ... silicate-Ni concentrations impact microbially-mediated silicate ... in silicate glass ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: kimberlye
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Weathering of Nickeldoped Silicate Glass in Anaerobic Groundwater Microcosms


1
The Weathering of Nickel-doped Silicate Glass in
Anaerobic Groundwater Microcosms
2
Research Question
  • How do increases in silicate-Ni concentrations
    impact microbially-mediated silicate weathering
    by a native, anaerobic consortia?

3
Hypotheses
  • Accelerated dissolution of Si will occur at low
    Ni concentrations due to Ni micronutrient
    requirements by methanogens.
  • High Ni concentrations are toxic to the native
    microbial consortia and will cause a decrease in
    biomass.

4
Lake
Well 9014
Oil Pool
Railroad
Spray Zone
Wetland
U.S. Geological Survey Bemidji Research Site
5
(No Transcript)
6
Methanogenesis
  • Methanogenesis is carried out by a group of
    strict anaerobes from the Archaea known as the
    methanogens
  • Most methanogens use CO2 as a terminal electron
    acceptor in anaerobic respiration, reducing it to
    CH4 and H2O

Madigan and Martinko 2006.
7
Methanogenesis and Syntrophy
  • Conversion of most organic compounds to CH4
    requires the partnership of methanogens with
    fermenters, which supply the substrates
  • H2, CO2, fatty acids and alcohols
  • Syntrophic relationship
  • The H2 produced in primary fermentation is
    removed by H2-consumers (methanogens)

Madigan and Martinko 2006.
8
Substrates for methanogenesis
  • CO2-type substrates
  • CO2 4H2 ?CH4 2H2O
  • Methyl substrates
  • CH3OH H2 ? CH4 H2O (methyl reduction)
  • 4CH3OH? 3CH4 CO2 2H2O (methyl oxidation)
  • Acetotrophic substrates
  • CH3COO- H2O ? CH4 HCO3-

Madigan and Martinko 2006.
9
DOC biodegradation products
Lovley and Phillips 1988, Madigan and Martinko
2006.
10
Variables to be tested
  • Silica flux
  • Iron reduction
  • pH
  • Change in alkalinity
  • Metabolic activity
  • CO2 and CH4
  • Biomass

11
Field methods
12
Field measurements
Alkanility 10.6 mmol/L
13
Silica solubility through time
14
Silica solubility at varying nickel concentrations
15
Fe II concentration comparison between averaged
replicates and sterile controls (day 35 vs. day
50)
16
pH
17
Change in alkalinity
18
Solution carbon dioxide Ni-doped glass (dayn -
day10)
19
Solution carbon dioxide Cu/Ni-doped glass vs.
Ni-doped glass (dayn - day10)
20
Change in solution methane (dayn - day10)
? CH4 (?mol/L)
21
Change in solution methane (dayn - day10)
22
Biomass comparison of microcosms (day 2 vs. day
50)
23
Interpretation of Results
24
Silica and Iron
  • Si(aq) ? Fe(II)(aq), therefore precipitation
    of silica may be a result of complexation with
    ferric iron precipitation
  • Confirm by XRD and SEM analyses

day 35 and day 50
25
Ni concentration in silicate glass
Contrary to the hypotheses, lower Ni
concentrations do not yield higher rates of
silica dissolution.
26
Biomass and CO2 Ni-doped glass
  • With the exception of Ni-1, biomass does not
    increase over time
  • Relative increase in CO2 over time, which
    reflects an increase in microbial respiration

day 2 vs. day 50
27
Biomass and CO2 Cu/Ni-doped glass
  • There is an increase in biomass, which coincides
    with increasing CO2

day 2 vs. day 50
28
Methane contribution
  • Increasing CH4 is negligible compared to CO2
  • Methanogenic bacteria represent a small fraction
    of microbial consortia
  • Ni proportion in glass inconsistently impacts
    methane production

29
Iron, pH, and alkalinity
  • Decreasing ferrous iron concentrations not
    expected in anaerobic environment
  • Evidence of O2 contamination
  • Fermenters, methanogens, and iron reducers
    stunted
  • Insignificant changes in pH and alkalinity

30
Conclusions
  • The relative rate of silica dissolution is not
    highest for low Ni concentration in glasses
  • Concentration of Ni-5 (2 mol ) does not appear
    to be toxic to the native microbial consortia
  • More time is needed to evaluate microcosms
  • Contamination has interfered with the
    experimental processes

31
References
  • Lovley DR, Phillips EJP. Novel mode of microbial
    energy metabolism Organic carbon oxidation
    coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or
    manganese. Applied and Environmental
    Microbiology, 54(6) 1472-1480.
  • Madigan MT, Martinko JM. 2006. Brock biology of
    microorganisms. - 11th edition. Pearson Prentice
    Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

32
Extra stuff
33
pH discussion
  • Fe Reduction
  • CH2O Fe(OH)3 ? Fe2 CO2 OH-
  • Fe Oxidation
  • Fe2 H2O O2 ? Fe(OH)3 H

34
Fe(III) reduction CH4 production in anaerobic
environments
  • e- donor competition among Fe(III)-reducing and
    methanogenic bacteria
  • Simultaneous when e- donors (H2) and acceptors
    are not limiting
  • The rate of organic matter fermentation limits
    the supply of e- donors to the TEAPs
  • When sufficient microbially-reducible Fe(III) is
    available, Fe(III) reducers outcompete
    methanogens for e- donors

35
Ni as a micronutrient
  • Ni is required as the central atom of the
    tetrapyrole coenzyme F430
  • Coenzyme F430 is in involved in the terminal step
    of methanogenesis as part of the methyl reductase
    enzyme complex

www.jaun.chem.ethz.ch/res/res_F430.html
36
Fe II Concentration Comparison between Averaged
Replicates (day 35 vs. day 50)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com