Reciprocal Altruism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Reciprocal Altruism

Description:

Reciprocal Altruism Elbert Lim Anthro 179 Reciprocal Altruism Term was coined by Robert Trivers (1970 s). Refers to the offering and receiving of support, but at a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:721
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: eclectic
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reciprocal Altruism


1
Reciprocal Altruism
  • Elbert Lim
  • Anthro 179

2
Reciprocal Altruism
  • Term was coined by Robert Trivers (1970s).
  • Refers to the offering and receiving of support,
    but at a cost to reproductive fitness.
  • Relatively recent field of study no real work
    done on this subject until late 1960s.

3
Origin
  • Darwins theory of evolution survival of the
    reproductively fit
  • How could natural selection favor the development
    of cooperative societies, when fitness is
    compromised in these societies?

4
Three Forms of Selection
  • Group selection
  • Kin selection
  • Reciprocity selection

5
Group Selection
  • Populations of species are divided into islands,
    or demes.
  • Favors any gene that lowers the likelihood of
    extinction for the deme that it occurs in.
  • Survival is population density-dependent must
    stay within an optimal range
  • Altruism favored because it prevented explosive
    population growth
  • Wynne-Edwards 1959, 1962
  • Considered the weakest principle of the three
    because
  • It fails to address how and why extinction occurs
    if a population lacks the appropriate regulatory
    controls.
  • Pays little attention to the possibility of
    subdivision within successful populations.

6
Kin Selection
  • Principle of competition among populations is
    rejected.
  • Assumes that actors can effectively identify each
    other from one another.
  • Success occurs if the fraction of genetic
    material preserved within a group is greater than
    the fraction of genetic material lost.
  • Exchange of altruistic behavior, as a result, is
    greater between relatives than between unrelated
    individuals.
  • Hamilton hypothesis in order for altruistic
    behavior to occur, the benefits, even among kin,
    must outweigh the cost (I.e. an actor is more
    willing to give up his life to save multiple
    actors over saving just one).

7
Reciprocity Selection
  • Just as in kin selection, the actors involved
    must be able to identify one another.
  • Most favored principle out of the three.
  • Actors involved in altruistic exchange do not
    need to be related.
  • Exchange is more likely to take place with actors
    exhibiting a propensity towards reciprocating
    cooperating (I.e. youd be more likely to buy a
    round for a generous friend than with the miser
    of the group).

8
Prisoners Dilemma
  • Most commonly used model in studying reciprocal
    altruism.
  • Prisoners Dilemma.
  • Actors in this model follow the conditions of the
    reciprocity model.
  • Most common strategy used in this problem is
    Tit-for-Tat.

9
Tit-for-Tat Strategy (in order of occurrence)
  • Start off by cooperating, and continue to do so
    as long as the partner does.
  • Defect only when the other actor defects.
  • Go back to cooperating with the partner once
    cooperation is restored by the other actor.
  • When mutual cooperation occurs, go back to
    cooperating with each other.
  • If multiple defection occurs, start defecting as
    well.
  • Other strategies included
  • Defecting on the first turn to gauge whether the
    partner could be trusted.
  • Continual defection against the sucker.

10
Shortcomings of the Prisoners Dilemma
  • Does not take into account group formation.
  • Individuals are not capable of choosing partners,
    as in real life, in this model.
  • Factors involved in changing interaction
    partners, such as migration, mutation, etc. are
    not taken into consideration.
  • Such shortcomings were found as recently as the
    late 1990s.
  • Zeggelinks Social Evolution Model (SEM),
    published in June 2000, offers a more inclusive
    simulation to study, but results, such as
    findings for existence of an ideal population
    density, are inconclusive.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com