Effectiveness of Field Edge Setback to Reduce Nutrient Transport from Manure Application to FrozenSn - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Effectiveness of Field Edge Setback to Reduce Nutrient Transport from Manure Application to FrozenSn

Description:

... f3 f 3 f ff fff3f3 33 3f333 f3 f 3 f 3 f 3 f ... f 3 f f f f ff 3f f ff fff3ff f f f ff 3f ff ffff fffff3fff3 f3 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: robert608
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effectiveness of Field Edge Setback to Reduce Nutrient Transport from Manure Application to FrozenSn


1
Effectiveness of Field Edge Setback to Reduce
Nutrient Transport from Manure Application to
Frozen/Snow Covered Fields
  • Robert Mullen, Clayton Dygert, and Jon Rausch
  • Nutrient Management/Soil Fertility Specialist
  • Ohio State University
  • Lima, OH
  • June 23, 2009

2
Introduction
  • Application of nutrients to frozen/snow covered
    fields represents a risk to surface water during
    thaw events
  • Are there application approaches that could be
    used to mitigate nutrient transport?

3
Objective
  • To evaluate the usefulness of establishing a 200
    ft setback to mitigate nutrient transport from a
    winter application of dairy manure to snow
    covered/frozen ground that has surface residue.

4
Field Layout
  • Slope lt 2
  • Fescue/ryegrass crop planted in late summer 2007
    to achieve 90 ground cover
  • Plot size 12 ft wide x 100 ft or 300 ft long
  • Manure was applied on January 28, 2008
  • Dairy manure from open lagoon was applied at a
    5,000 gallons per acre rate
  • NH4-N rate 24 lb/acre, P2O5 rate 11.5
    lb/acre, K2O rate 86.5 lb/acre

5
Plot Layout
Manure application
Bucket collectors
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
Weather data
  • Sampling dates

12
Data
  • February 8, 2008
  • No statistical differences

13
Data
  • February 8, 2008
  • DRP and TP were significantly higher in the
    manure/no setbacktreatment

LSD0.1 PO4-P 0.10
LSD0.1 TP 0.13
14
Data
  • February 8, 2008

LSD0.1 K 0.7
15
Data
  • February 18, 2008
  • Ammonium-N levels were numerically higher in the
    manure/no setbacktreatment

LSD0.1 NH4-N 23.1
16
Data
  • February 18, 2008
  • Manure/no setback treatment had numerically
    higher DRP and TPthan all other treatments

LSD0.1 PO4-P 2.6
LSD0.1 TP 4.4
17
Data
  • February 18, 2008

LSD0.1 K 7.8
18
Data
  • March 17, 2008
  • Ammonium-N levels were significantly higher in
    the manure/no setbacktreatment

LSD0.1 NH4-N 5.1
19
Data
  • March 17, 2008
  • DRP and TP levels were significantly higher in
    the manure/no setback treatment

LSD0.1 PO4-P 0.9
LSD0.1 TP 1.2
20
Data
  • March 17, 2008

LSD0.1 K 2.0
21
Data
  • April 3, 2008
  • Manured treatments had numerically higher
    ammonium-N levelsthan non-manuredtreatments

LSD0.1 NH4-N 9.3
22
Data
  • April 3, 2008
  • Manure treatments had numerically higher DRP and
    TP levelsthan non-manuredtreatments

LSD0.1 PO4-P 2.1
LSD0.1 TP 3.6
23
Data
  • April 3, 2008

LSD0.1 K 0.9
24
Thanks!!!
  • Questions?
  • Useful webpages
  • Agronomic Crops Team
  • http//agcrops.osu.edu/
  • OSU Fertility web page
  • http//agcrops.osu.edu/fertility
  • Crop Observation and Recommendation Network
    (CORN)
  • http//corn.osu.edu/

25
2009
  • Same general experiment with a few exceptions
  • Corn planted in May 2008
  • Manure applied at same rates and methodologies in
    January 23, 2009
  • NH4-N rate lb/acre, P2O5 rate lb/acre, K2O rate
    lb/acre
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com