Evaluation of Loran Timing Receivers at NPL - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation of Loran Timing Receivers at NPL

Description:

Time and Frequency, Division of Enabling Metrology, NPL. Location ... Derived from a single hydrogen maser. Kept within 30ns from UTC. Timing via eLoran ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:34
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: romanh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation of Loran Timing Receivers at NPL


1
Evaluation of Loran Timing Receivers at NPL
  • R. Hlavac and P. W. Stacey
  • Time and Frequency, Division of Enabling
    Metrology, NPL
  • Location Timing Applications
  • 9-11 November 2004

2
Contents
  • Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
  • Timing via eLoran and Loran-C/Eurofix
  • Experiments with Locus CsSync 1000 Timing
    Receivers
  • Discussion of Obtained Results
  • Future Work

3
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)
  • UTC - Coordinated Universal Time
  • International timescale
  • Computed by BIPM, Paris
  • Post processed monthly, feedback via Circular T
  • UTC(NPL)
  • Base for UK legal time
  • Realized at National Physical Laboratory
  • Derived from a single hydrogen maser
  • Kept within 30ns from UTC

4
Timing via eLoran and Loran-C/Eurofix
  • eLoran
  • Extensive modernization since late 1990s
  • New Timing and Frequency Equipment (TFE)
  • 3x Cs clock- 5071A
  • Steered via GPS to stay within 15ns (rms) from
    UTC(USNO)
  • Kalman filter to flywheel GPS outages

5
Timing via eLoran and Loran-C/Eurofix
  • Loran-C/Eurofix
  • Expanding on contemporary Loran-C functionality
  • Transmission of short messages
  • Extra time modulation of Loran-C signal
  • Timing controlled by Control Centre Brest (CCB,
    France)

6
Experiments with Locus CsSync 1000Timing
Receivers
  • CsSync 1000 (DSP-based, all-in-view)
  • Navigation mode (over 40 stations)
  • Improved signal to noise ration
  • Timing mode (locked to one station)
  • E-Field antenna

7
Experiments with Locus CsSync 1000Timing
Receivers
  • Experiment between 9thJune 6th September 2004
    at NPL
  • Receivers locked to Loran-C station in Lessay,
    France
  • Rcvrs 10MHz output (derived from Lessay)
  • Rcvrs 1pps output not aligned to UTC
  • Sampling rate
  • 30s for 1pps data
  • 10s for phase data

8
Experiments with Locus CsSync 1000Timing
Receivers
9
Discussion of Obtained Results
  • Offset removed
  • Daily cycling
  • Temperature
  • Sky-wave
  • Variations
  • 80ns p-p
  • Scatter of 50-60ns

10
Discussion of Obtained Results
  • Continuation
  • 1 pps derived from int. 10MHz
  • Loran-C clock drift (underlying process)

11
Discussion of Obtained Results
  • Fractional frequency
  • fr (f-f0)/f0 -
  • Frequency stability (Allan deviation)
  • 2x10 -13 (t 1 day)
  • Comparable to Cs clock
  • Better than MSF

12
Common-View Method
CV ARefA-Loran BRefB-Loran A-BRefA-RefB
13
Discussion of Obtained Results
  • Offset removed
  • Variations down to 40ns p-p
  • Scatter of 30ns
  • Standard deviation 9ns (1s)

14
Discussion of Obtained Results
  • GPS-CV perform better than Loran-C CV
  • Chip rate
  • Coding
  • L-band
  • Loran-C CV
  • Short baseline
  • Instabilities get cancelled

15
Discussion of Obtained Results
  • Two processes
  • At t60s rcvrs locking constant
  • At t43000s (noon) atmospheric and/or
    environmental effects

16
Conclusions
  • eLoran and Loran-C/Eurofix can be used as source
    of precise frequency( signal controlled by Cs
    clock)
  • Neither eLoran nor Loran-C/Eurofix has
    implemented UTC service as yet (100ns rms at user
    site, meets stratum 1)
  • Loran-C performs well above its current timing
    and frequency requirements (frq. stability
    1x10-12 t1 day)
  • Can be used as a GPS backup

17
Conclusions
  • Frequency stability of 2x10-13 or 1.8x10-13 (t
    1day) for standalone receiver or common view
    mode, respectively
  • Loran system instabilities contribution is very
    small, compared to receiver instabilities, short
    baseline CV
  • Standard deviation of Loran-C CV data 9ns (1s),
    variations down to 40ns, scatter down to 30ns
    (24hours)

18
Future work
  • Continue in evaluation of Loran-C as a source of
    accurate time and stable frequency
  • Perform Loran-C common-view experiment on longer
    base lines
  • Extend our measurement capabilities to implement
    Loran-C monitoring, should Loran-C usage in the
    UK expand

19
Acknowledgements
  • Authors would like to express their thanks to
  • Locus Inc. for lending us receivers and antennas
  • John Davis and Peter Whibberley at NPL and Linn
    Roth at Locus Inc. for their valuable advice

20
Contact Details
  • Roman Hlavac
  • Time and Frequency
  • Division of Enabling Metrology
  • National Physical Laboratory
  • Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
  • Email roman.hlavac_at_npl.co.uk
  • TelĀ  44 208 943 6452/6351
  • Fax 44 208 943 6529
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com