NKF-KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

NKF-KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease

Description:

NKF-KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for ... CPR and CPG 2.1: Hb Target. Introduction ... CPR 2.1.1. Considerations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:818
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: david1511
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NKF-KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease


1
NKF-KDOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines and
Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in
Chronic Kidney Disease
UPDATE OF HEMOGLOBIN TARGET Am.J.Kidney.Dis. 50
(3)471-530, 2007.
2
KDOQI AnemiaOrganization
  • Evidence Review Team
  • Tufts New England Medical Center
  • Work Group
  • 9 Adult Nephrologists
  • 2 Pediatric Nephrologists
  • 2 Hematologists
  • 1 Nurse Practitioner
  • 1 Dietician

3
CPR and CPG 2.1 Hb TargetIntroduction
  • The Hb target is the intended aim of ESA therapy
    for the individual CKD patient. In clinical
    practice, achieved Hb results vary considerably
    from the Hb target.

4
CPR 2.1.1Considerations
  • In the opinion of the work group, selection of
    the Hb target and selection of the Hb level at
    which ESA therapy is initiated in the individual
    patient should include consideration of potential
    benefits (including improvement in quality of
    life and avoidance of transfusion) and potential
    harms (including the risk of life-threatening
    adverse events). (Clinical Practice
    RECOMMENDATION)

5
CPR 2.1.2Selection of the Hb target
  • In the opinion of the work group, in dialysis and
    non-dialysis CKD patients receiving ESA therapy,
    the selected Hb target should generally be in the
    range of 11.0 to 12.0 g/dL. (Clinical Practice
    RECOMMENDATION)

6
CPG 2.1.3Hb targets to avoid
  • In dialysis and non-dialysis CKD patients
    receiving ESA therapy, the Hb target should not
    be above 13.0 g/dL. (Clinical Practice GUIDELINE
    - MODERATELY STRONG EVIDENCE)

7
Rationale 2.1.2
8
Distinguishing Target Hb from Achieved Hb
Rationale 2.1.2
  • Target Hb is the aim of ESA therapy
  • Achieved Hb is the result of ESA therapy
  • Achieved Hb results vary considerably from the Hb
    target
  • Safety of achieved Hb relative to 11-12 g/dL
    target Hb or Hb gt 11 g/dL threshold is
    well-established

9
The Hb target should not be above 13.0 g/dL
(Moderately Strong Recommendation)
Rationale 2.1.3
  • Evidence from RCTs
  • Considered all trials that compared Hb target gt
    13.0 g/dL to lower target
  • All these RCTs tested the hypothesis that the
    higher target would prevent adverse
    cardiovascular events or mortality, or all cause
    mortality
  • None showed a benefit on those outcomes

10
Meta-Analysis
  • Performed by Evidence Review Team
  • RCTs with 6 months follow-up, no restriction on
    study size
  • Statistical model random effects
  • Separated dialysis from non-dialysis CKD trials
  • Combined all cardiovascular disease events for
    analysis of cardiovascular adverse event risk

11
Relative mortality risk for assignment to higher
treatment targets Non-Dialysis-CKD
Rationale 2.1.3
Higher Hb Target
Relative Risk 1.02, 95 CI 0.63-1.61
12
Relative risk of cardiovascular events for
assignment to higher targets Non-dialysis CKD
Rationale 2.1.3
Relative Risk 1.24, 95 CI 1.02-1.51
13
Relative mortality risk for assignment to higher
treatment targets Dialysis CKD
Rationale 2.1.3
Higher Hb Target
14.0
13.0-14.0
13.5-16.0
13.5-14.5
Relative Risk 1.12, 95 CI 0.91-1.37
14
Relative risk of cardiovascular events for
assignment to higher targets Dialysis CKD
Rationale 2.1.3
Higher Hb Target
14.0
13.0-14.0
13.5-14.5
Relative Risk 1.14, 95 CI 0.79-1.64
15
The Statement Hb Target should not be above 13
g/dL
Rationale 2.1.3
  • Reflects Work Group judgment
  • The possibility to cause harm weighs more heavily
    than the potential to improve quality of life and
    reduce the likelihood of transfusions
  • Moderately strong, evidence-based, clinical
    practice guideline
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com