http:www'reshare'comPresentationschannel_management_2index'htm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

http:www'reshare'comPresentationschannel_management_2index'htm

Description:

... replaced by co-branded eCommerce capabilities within Macys.com and JCPenny.com. ... model, the consumer goes to brandname.com, shops for a product, and clicks on ' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: maryelle3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: http:www'reshare'comPresentationschannel_management_2index'htm


1
According to the Gartner Group, more than 90 of
manufacturers don't sell online. The main reason?
Channel conflict. Distributors and retailers are
totally, utterly, fiercely, and understandably
protective of letting customers buy products
elsewhere. Especially when that "elsewhere" is
the manufacturer of whom distributors and
retailers are inherently suspicious and
distrustful.

 
  Over 90 of manufacturers dont sell online -
Gartner Group  
  • http//www.reshare.com/Presentations/channel_manag
    ement_2/index.htm

2
  • You can sell through whatever channels you
    like, but we have the right to be selective too.
    We might hesitate to do business with our
    competitors- Home Depot  Home Depot made
    this same message loud and clear in a letter to
    their 5,000 vendors. They said "You can sell
    through whatever channels you like, but we have
    the right to be selective too. We might be
    hesitant to do business with our competitors."
    Companies like Maytag and Black Decker ceased
    their direct to consumer eCommerce operations at
    the time and could only sell their products
    online through a co-branded Home Depot store.
    Levis had a thriving online business in the early
    days of eCommerce that was rapidly shut down only
    to be replaced by co-branded eCommerce
    capabilities within Macys.com and JCPenny.com.
    The direct sales model that Maytag, Black
    Decker and Levis undertook harmed the
    relationship with all of their channel partners
    and the co-branded solution which ensued served
    to benefit only a select few channel partners to
    an even greater detriment to the rest

3
  • 66 of manufacturers cite channel conflict as the
    1 reason for not selling online- Forrester
    Research  Manufacturers know better than to
    anger distributors. According to Forrester
    Research, 66 of those surveyed cite channel
    conflict as the major obstacle to selling online.
    At the same time, manufacturers know that online
    shoppers are flocking to their sites. A Forrester
    survey of almost 9,000 users whove made an
    online purchase shows that 80 have visited a
    manufacturers site, and their visits arent
    limited to one part of the purchase process. They
    visit throughout the buying cycle, because they
    dont draw distinctions between retailers and
    manufacturers.

4
  • Six channel solution
  • The Grenade Model Destroy the ChannelThe Dead
    End Model Do Nothing to Refer CustomersThe
    Fumble Model Refer but Lose CustomersThe
    Broken Boomerang Model Share but Lose
    CustomersThe Two Faced Model Partially serve
    customers and damage your channelThe Reshare
    Model Complete Channel Harmony and Customer
    Satisfaction

5
  • The Grenade ModelDestroy the Channel  We call
    this the Grenade Model because the results will
    be explosive and the grenade can always be tossed
    back at you. This is the approach Herman Miller
    took. They went online, telling channel partners
    that it's their way or the highway. How do
    channel partners feel about this? As an executive
    at Miller's second largest dealer said, "They've
    made their dealer community an essential business
    partner over the years. Now, they're saying let's
    fight them for this kind of business on the
    Internet." Contract suppliers and retailers are
    very unhappy about Miller selling online and see
    it as direct competition. One prominent retailer
    said, "if a comparable product was available
    today and the manufacturer guaranteed not to
    compete with us on the Internet, we would drop
    Miller immediately." Miller has lost dealers and
    retailers over the strategy. There are a
    multitude of examples of major companies who have
    done this and failed through lost market share,
    dealer support and complete channel retaliation.

6
  • The Dead End ModelDo Nothing to Refer Customers
     
  • The Dead End Model will leave your customers
    with nowhere to go. Although most companies
    recognize the need for a methodology that offers
    customers sources for their products, there still
    remain those who have not executed such a
    strategy. We can cite several examples of
    companies with tremendous websites featuring all
    of their products with no store locator or online
    sales. It will not shock you to learn that this
    model is a lose-lose proposition for all. For
    customers, not being able to buy online is
    frustrating enough. But not even being able to
    find a distributor or retailer or get a phone
    number is quite another. Retailers lose the
    awareness that a Web site could provide and the
    business that results from it. The manufacturer
    or brand owner loses sales and something far more
    important - brand satisfaction.

7
  • The Fumble ModelRefer but Lose Customers
     The Fumble Model exists when you send your
    customer to your channel partner in the hope that
    they will promote your brand with the same
    veracity as you. While retailers are only
    concerned about selling a brand, you should
    only be concerned about selling your brand. At
    Titleist Golfs website, you can search for
    nearby retailers by city, state, zip or name.
    Titleist gives numerous options in an attempt to
    even the playing field for competitive retailers
    and give consumers more choice. Unfortunately, by
    using this model, you may lose your customer to
    another brand-perhaps an online brand that can
    meet the customers needs then and there. And no
    matter how you look at it, you lose control of
    the branded experience that you've worked so hard
    to achieve. Perhaps Titleist is a strong enough
    brand to prevent customer defections by a
    retailer recommendation, but even for Titleist
    there are no guarantees. Are there for you?

8
  • The Two Faced ModelPartially serve customers and
    damage your channel  In this Two Faced
    model, customers can purchase a limited selection
    of your products from your website. This is the
    case at upscale fashion accessory designer Kate
    Spade. The products may represent a segment of
    your entire line or be an entirely separate
    online-only offering. Regardless, customers
    expect that the manufacturer itself should offer
    its full suite of products. The customer is
    rarely satisfied by being forced to choose from a
    limited selection and will often leave your site
    without purchasing. The result is a negative
    brand experience. At the same time, your
    distribution channel sees your online store as
    direct competition. Even if you sell different
    products online, distributors and retailers are
    now put in the position to compete with you for a
    finite number of consumer dollars. Furthermore,
    channel partners see your initiative as a first
    step towards being totally circumvented by you,
    whether that is your intention or not. Channel
    relationships will worsen and focus on your brand
    in retail establishments will be diverted to
    other brands that appear more loyal to the
    distribution channel.

9
  • The Broken Boomerang ModelShare but Lose
    Customers  A Broken Boomerang best
    exemplifies this model. You throw your customer
    to your channel partner with the expectation that
    the sale will return to you through a customer
    purchase of your brand, only to discover that you
    have no idea what happened to it. In this model,
    the consumer goes to brandname.com, shops for a
    product, and clicks on buy online, taking them
    to icons of online retailers that are supposed to
    have the item in question IN STOCK. The customer
    chooses a retailer and is taken to the product
    page at the retailers website. Now at the
    retailers site, the consumer may be influenced
    by competing brands. We have seen countless
    examples where the desired product is not in
    stock, forcing the consumer to search for
    alternatives. The result is a complete loss of
    the brand experience the manufacturer has worked
    so hard to deliver, the potential for a lost
    sale, the ultimate loss of the relationships
    between the manufacturer and the consumer and all
    of the geo-demographic, psychological and
    purchasing data associated with the consumer.

10
  • The Reshare ModelComplete Channel Harmony and
    Customer Satisfaction  Imagine having
    absolute control over your customers online
    experience at your branded website. Imagine being
    able to develop a relationship with each of your
    channel partners and end customers, regardless of
    how complex or layered your channel is. Imagine
    satisfying the contractual, legislative and
    relational requirements of your entire
    distribution channel all of the time. You are
    imagining Reshare. Reshare is the leading
    Distribution Relationship Management (DRM)
    software and strategy company with the only
    patented DRM solution that enables manufacturers
    and brand owners to sell online directly to end
    users without circumventing their valuable
    channel partners. With over 20 years of online
    experience across a multitude of industries, we
    offer software and strategies that resolve
    channel conflict, guarantee complete brand
    control and enhance relationships between all
    channel partners and end users while increasing
    revenue, market share and profitability.

11
  • Allows you to sell directly to business buyers
    consumersAssures total brand controlPreserves
    your critical channel relationsProvides Bricks
    Mortar service, support and returnsBuilds
    partner and consumer relationshipsProvides
    incremental revenueGives you a strategic
    competitive advantage

12
  • Benefits to the Manufacturer
  • Potential customers visit the web sites of brand
    owning manufacturers every minute of every day.
    They conduct research, look for products, compare
    prices and make buying decisions. Allowing these
    prospects to become customers right at their web
    site captures business for the manufacturer that
    might otherwise be lost to competitors or lack of
    action. Increased sales result. In many instances
    customers need, and are willing to purchase, more
    than one product. Manufacturers who control the
    purchasing opportunities of their customers are
    able to offer them further opportunities for
    additional sales. Manufacturers can use on-line
    incentives, collaborative filtering (product
    recommendation engines), instant discounts and
    more to increase their ability to cross sell.
  • By establishing, sometimes for the first time, a
    direct connection with their end customers,
    manufacturers are able to gain important
    geo-demographic information about these customers
    which allows them to build better products,
    improve existing products, offer in-demand
    complementary products or build additional
    products.
  • Brand degradation is an important issue with
    almost all manufacturers. Products are being sold
    over the internet whether the manufacturer
    supports it or not, often through illegitimate
    channels. The only way to truly control internet
    sales of a given product is to allow buyers the
    opportunity to purchase legitimate products sold
    directly by the manufacturer. Customers trust the
    quality, authenticity and support of the brands
    manufacturer.
  • Manufacturers who sell directly on-line, and
    fully support their distribution system, have an
    opportunity to influence inventory decisions at
    the retail level. Information received by
    customers can be used to support sales of
    additional lines, skus or models.
  • In a Business-to-Business (B2B) application,
    on-line purchasing directly from the manufacturer
    can significantly increase ROI. On-line ordering
    of both end-products and parts can have a
    significant impact on a clients bottom line.

13
  • Significant Return on Investment
  • The efficiencies and cost savings that are being
    realized by the proper use of the internet are
    staggering. USFoods' (through its acquisition of
    Alliant Foodservice) online purchasing system
    lowers their internal costs from 107 to 30 and
    boosts the average order size by over 30. These
    remarkable savings allow USFoods to serve their
    customer better, improve profitability and
    shareholder value.
  • According to a May 24th, 2004 Forrester Research
    report, Retailers lose billions when their
    shoppers research online and then defect to other
    brands when they buy offline. This is even more
    prevalent when consumers are shopping for
    individual brands online with the intention of
    buying and are somehow diverted from the brand
    due to lack of availability or competitive
    influences.
  • The cost of a lost sale is astronomical if it
    means the defection of a customer, regardless of
    how long they have been a customer. Long term
    customers are a vital source of profitability.
    They purchase more each year and often pay more
    for products and services because they trust you.
    A typical order at Dominos Pizza averages 12.58
    however the value of that customer exceeds 5,000
    over the life of a 10-year franchise contract,
    according to a study by the Harvard Business
    School, Companies can boost profits by almost
    100 by retaining just 5 more of their
    customers. Their report on customer defections
    included analysis of more than 100 companies in
    two dozen industries and shows that a reduction
    of defections by just 5 translates to a boost in
    profits of 25.

14
  • Benefits to the Channel
  • In recent years, manufacturing companies that are
    not channel dependent and sell directly to the
    customer on-line have become prominent in many
    industries. When a customer chooses to purchase
    from such a company the entire channel of a
    dependent manufacturer suffers through lost
    sales, revenues, etc. Sometimes these new
    manufacturers compete on price, sometimes its
    simply on ease of purchase and availability of
    product. If the channel dependent manufacturer is
    able to compete on the same playing field as the
    non-dependent manufacturer, it will win more
    often than not, and the entire channel benefits.
    In many channel dependent industries goods may
    have to pass through multiple intermediaries
    before they end up in the hands of the end
    consumer. Each of these touch points represents
    an additional cost to transport, store,
    inventory, insure and track the goods. If the
    goods pass from the manufacturer to a single
    fulfillment source that can deliver it to the end
    customer, margins are increased, and ROI for the
    entire channel can increase.
  • Fewer product touches also means fewer
    opportunities for theft, loss or damage.
  • Smaller retailers have little to no negotiating
    power with respect to rates charged by national
    credit card companies. If all on-line purchases
    are funneled through a single source, lower rates
    can be charged which increases margins.
  • Since on-line purchases are made through an
    outside independent party where all transactions
    are transparent and open for review, trust can be
    more easily established up and down the entire
    channel.

15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com