Introduction to QPF RFC/HPC Hydromet 01-2 Presented by Wes Junker Wednesday, 6 December - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction to QPF RFC/HPC Hydromet 01-2 Presented by Wes Junker Wednesday, 6 December

Description:

... SHEAR (more important for severe weather forecasting) ... LOOK AT SATELLITE AND RADAR AND TRY TO IDENTIFY MESOSCALE FEATURES. ... You live at the blue dot ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: norman79
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction to QPF RFC/HPC Hydromet 01-2 Presented by Wes Junker Wednesday, 6 December


1
Introduction to QPFRFC/HPC Hydromet
01-2Presented byWes JunkerWednesday, 6 December
2
Introduction to QPF
  • Must determine
  • Where
  • When
  • How Much rainfall will occur
  • Must undersand the processes that determine the
    size, scale and intensity of an area of
    precipitation
  • (synoptic, mesoscale, and even microscale
    meteorology)
  • Must ..Possess Good Pattern Recognition Skills
    and understand what gives the pattern the
    potential to produce signficant rainfall
  • Must Possess a working Knowledge of
  • Local Climatology
  • Understand numerical models
  • especially model biases and why they occur
  • These are gained through experience and research

3
WHERE, WHEN, AND HOW MUCH
WHERE and WHEN does precipitation fall ?
Generically, Precipitation is produced in regions
of combined moisture and lift.
How much precipitation will fall ? Is determined
by
  • Available moisture
  • Intensity of precipitation
  • Will the precipitation be convective or not?
  • Areal coverage of precipitaiton
  • Speed of precipitation area
  • Existence of training cells
  • Enhancement by boundaries/topography

The heaviest precipitation usually occurs in
regions of high moisture and best lift where the
atmosphere is most unstable (instability).
4
QUESTIONS TO ASK WHEN PREPARING A QPF
  • WHAT IS THE TIME RANGE AND PERIOD OF THE
    FORECAST?
  • IS THIS SYNOPTIC OR MESOSCALE PATTERN ONE YOU
    RECOGNIZE?
  • WHAT TYPE PRECIPITATION EVENT AM I DEALING WITH,
    CONVECTIVE OR STRATOFORM? OR SOME COMBINATION OF
    BOTH?
  • DOES THIS PATTERN FAVOR HEAVY OR LIGHT RAINFALL
  • HOW CONFIDENT ARE YOU OF YOUR FORECAST?
  • IF YOU LACK CONFIDENCE, BE CONSERVATIVE

5
ALSO ASK
  • Which model is handling each system best
  • use a model qpf as a background
  • then try to figure out what the model is doing
    correctly and incorrectly
  • if no model is clear choice use an ensemble
    approach based on the various models
  • eta, eta/kf, mm5, avn, gem, nogaps
  • models do not do a good job predicting heavy
    rainfall. Use the models mass fields and
    knowledge of model performance to help forecast
    the heavier rains.

6
THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL THAT FALLS OVER AN AREA
DEPENDS ON
  • SIZE OF THE RAINFALL AREA
  • THE INTENSITY OF THE RAINFALL WITHIN IT
  • HOW FAST THESE AREAS MOVE
  • HOW FAST NEW RAIN BEARING CLOUDS ARE FORMING
    UPSTREAM (PROPAGATION)

7
A FEW IDEAS TO HELP DETERMINE HOW BIG AN AREA OF
RAINFALL TO FORECAST
  • THE SIZE IS DEPENDENT ON HOW MUCH MOISTURE IS
    PRESENT AND ON THE STRENGTH OF THE MOISTURE
    TRANSPORT
  • IS DEPENDENT ON BOTH THE ABSOLUTE (PWS, MIXING
    RATIOS) AND RELATIVE MOISTURE (RH)
  • THE SIZE IS DEPENDENT ON THE SYSTEMS MOVEMENT
  • SIZE IS DEPENDENT ON THE SCALE OF THE FORCING
  • PATTERN RECOGNITION IS ONE OF THE BEST TOOLS TO
    USE WHEN TRYING TO FORECAST THE SCALE OF THE
    EVENT.
  • MODEL GUIDANCE PROVIDES A DECENT FIRST GUESS,
    ESPECIALLY OF COOL SEASON STRATOFORM EVENTS

8
PATTERN RECOGNITION REMAINS IMPORTANT DESPITE
EXAMPLES BY RAUBER AND BOSART (1997). THEY
NOTED THAT SIMILAR SYNOPTIC PATTERNS CAN PRODUCE
VERY DIFFERENT QPFS
  • HOWEVER, HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS SHARE CERTAIN
    CHARACTERISTICS.
  • EVEN IN WINTER, HEAVY RAIN USUALLY FALLS IN
    MESOSCALE BANDS
  • HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS CAN OFTEN BE IDENTIFIED BY
    THEIR PATTERNS
  • BUT YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS ABOUT THE
    PATTERN THAT FAVORS HEAVY RAINFALL
  • YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE PHYSICS.
  • HOWEVER, PATTERNS VARY BY
  • SEASON, GEOGRAPHIC REGION AND SCALE
  • PATTERNS ARE IDENTIFIED
  • BY CONVENTIONAL DATA, MODEL OUTPUT, SATELLITE AND
    RADAR IMAGERY

9
START BY LOOKING AT SYNOPTIC SCALE (THE BIG
PICTURE)
  • THERE IS A CLEAR ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SHORT-WAVE
    TROUGHS AND CONVECTION
  • THE VERTICAL MOTION ASSOCIATED WITH SYNOPTIC
    SCALE LIFT DOES NOT TYPICALLY ALLOW PARCELS TO
    REACH THE LEVEL OF FREE CONVECTION (LFC)
  • HOWEVER, LARGE SCALE LIFT
  • STEEPENS LAPSE RATE
  • PROMOTES MOISTURE TRANSPORT
  • WEAKENS CAP
  • AFFECTS VERTICAL SHEAR (more important for
    severe weather forecasting)

10
NEXT LOOK FOR MESOSCALE FEATURES
  • DO A MESOANALYSIS OF SURFACE AND UPPER AIR DATA
    IF TIME ALLOWS.
  • LOOK AT SATELLITE AND RADAR AND TRY TO IDENTIFY
    MESOSCALE FEATURES. ALSO TRY TO DETERMINE WHAT
    IS CAUSING THE CURRENT PRECIPITATION.
  • IDENTIFY SURFACE BOUNDARIES
  • (FRONTS, DRY LINES, OUTFLOW BOUNDARIES, SEA
    BREEZE FRONTS, LAND USE BOUNDARIES, ETC.

11
USE MODELS TO IDENTIFY SYNOPTIC AND MESOSCALE
PATTERNS THAT ARE FAVORABLE TO HEAVY RAINS
  • CAN USE THE SURFACE, 850- AND 500-MB PATTERNS TO
    IDENTIFY MADDOX ET AL. OR OTHER TYPES OF HEAVY
    RAINFALL EVENTS
  • ALSO NEED TO LOOK CLOSELY AT MOISTURE, MOISTURE
    TRANSPORT AND INSTABILITY
  • MODELS OFTEN PROVIDE DECENT FORECASTS OF
    LOW-LEVEL WIND AND MOISTURE FIELDS
  • 850 MOISTURE TRANSPORT (MOISTURE FLUX)
  • PWS
  • OUTPUT CAN BE USED TO ASSESS FORCING AND TO
    FORECAST THE LOCATION OF BOUNDARIES.
  • HOWEVER, UNDERSTAND THE LIMITATIONS OF THE MODELS
    AND BEWARE OF MODEL BIASES!!

12
PRECIPITATION INTENSITY
  • IS PROPORTIONAL TO THE VERTICAL MOISTURE FLUX
    INTO THE CLOUD.
  • THEREFORE, FORECASTS SHOULD START WITH AN
    ASSESSMENT OF HOW MUCH MOISTURE WILL BE AVAILABLE
  • NEED TO ESTIMATE WHAT PROPORTION OF THE MOISTURE
    ENTERING THE CLOUD SYSTEM WILL FALL AS RAIN (THE
    EFFICIENCY OF THE SYSTEM)
  • NEED TO ASSESS THE LIFTING
  • ARE MESOSCALE SOURCES OF LIFT PRESENT?
  • WILL TERRAIN CONTRIBUTE TO LIFTING
  • HOW MUCH POTENTIAL BUOYANT ENERGY (PBE) IS
    PRESENT? PBE GIVES AN IDEA OF THE STRENGTH OF
    THE UPDRAFT DURING ANY CONVECTION THAT DEVELOPS.

13
MORE ON PRECIPITATION EFFICIENCY OF A SYSTEM
  • SOME OF INFLOWING WATER VAPOR PASSES THROUGH THE
    SYSTEM WITHOUT CONDENSING
  • OF THE VAPOR THAT CONDENSES
  • SOME EVAPORATES
  • SOME FALLS AS PRECIPITATION
  • SOME IS CARRIED AWAY AS CLOUDS (PERHAPS
    EVAPORATING SOMEWHERE ELSE)
  • a dry layer inhibits precipitation production
  • strong shear also not condusive to efficient
    precipitation production

FROM DOSWELL NOTES, 1995
14
PRECIPITATION EFFICIENCY FACTORS (The cloud
physics)
Warm rain processes are more efficient
  • WANT A DEEP WARM LAYER
  • RAINFALL INTENSITY WILL BE GREATER IF DEPTH OF
    WARM LAYER FROM LCL TO 0oC ISOTHERM IS 3-4 KM.
  • LOW CLOUD BASE (USUALLY OCCURS WITH HIGHER
    RELATIVE HUMIDITIES)
  • COLLISION-COALESCENCE PROCESSES ARE ENHANCED BY
    INCREASED RESIDENCE TIME IN CLOUD
  • WANT A BROAD SPECTRUM OF CLOUD DROPLET SIZES
  • THIS IS PRESENT WHEN AIRMASSES HAVE HAD LONG
    TRAJECTORIES OVER OCEANS.
  • WEAK TO MODERATE SHEAR

15
An inch an hour rainfall rates peak in June
(left),
Frequency (events/year) or 1 in. h-1 or larger
rainfall totals for July objectively analyzed to
a regular grid form the HPD stations. Contour
intervals of 0.1, 0.2, 0.25,0.33,.0.5,0.66,0.75,
and 1.0 events year -1
From Brooks and Stensrud 2000 MWR
16
NOTE LOGARITHMIC DECAY OF RAINFALL RATES
From Brooks and Stensrud 2000 MWR
Shadyside Oh, Fort Collins Co, and Madison County
VA all had extreme rainfall events. How do I
tell when rainfall rates will be 1/hr verus 4 or
5 inchers per hour???
17
Will convection occur
  • convection produces most heavy rainfall events
  • there are three ingredients needed for deep moist
    convection
  • moisture
  • instability
  • upward motion

18
ASSESSING INSTABILITY
  • SOUNDINGS ARE BEST TOOL, LOOK FOR
  • DEPTH OF MOISTURE
  • VERTICAL WIND PROFILE
  • CAPE AND CIN
  • EQUILIBRIUM LEVEL (WARM TOP CONVECTION)
  • STABILITY INDICES (LIFTED, K, TOTALS, SHOWALTER)
  • K INDICES ARE A GOOD INDICATOR OF THE DEPTH OF
    THE MOISTURE

19
ANTICIPATE HOW THE STABILITY IS CHANGING
  • THE LAPSE RATE CAN BE CHANGED BY
  • DIABATIC HEATING
  • ADVECTION OF A DIFFERENT LAPSE RATE INTO THE
    AREA
  • DIFFERENTIAL ADVECTION OF TEMPERATURE
  • VERTICAL MOTION/DIFFERENTIAL VERTICAL MOTION

20
CAPE
  • THE POSITIVE AREA OF THE SOUNDING BETWEEN THE LFC
    AND EQUILIBRIUM LEVEL
  • THEORETICAL MAXIMUM VALUE OF UPDRAFTS WITHIN A
    STORM (2CAPE)1/2
  • CAPE IS A BETTER INDICATOR OF INSTABILITY THAN
    ANY INDEX THAT USES ONLY MANDATORY LEVELS
  • WHILE INSTABILITY IS PRESENT WITH ALMOST ALL
    HEAVY RAINFALL EVENTS, HIGH CAPES ARE NOT NEEDED
    FOR HEAVY RAINS
  • STORMS HAVING MODERATE CAPE ARE USUALLY MORE
    EFFICIENT
  • MODELS OFTEN DONT FORECAST CAPE WELL

21
TO RELEASE CONVECTIVE AVAILABLE POTENTIAL ENERGY
  • SYNOPTIC SCALE FORCING DOES NOT ACT QUICKLY
    ENOUGH TO BREAK A CAP.
  • BUT DOES ACT TO MOISTEN THE AIRMASS AND WEAKEN
    THE CAP
  • YOU NEED MESOSCALE SOURCE OF LIFTING TO REACH
    LEVEL OF FREE CONVECTION.
  • LOW-LEVEL BOUNDARIES, FRONTS
  • LOW LEVEL CONVERGENCE
  • TRY TO FIND BOUNDARIES IN TEMPERATURE, DEWPOINT,
    THETA-E AND WIND FIELDS

22
IMPORTANCE OF CINTHE NEGATIVE AREA OF THE
SOUNDING
  • EARLY IN DAY SOUNDING OFTEN HAS INVERSION
  • WHEN A STEEP LAPSE RATE IS LOCATED ABOVE
    INVERSION, YOU HAVE CLASSIC LOAD GUN SOUNDING
  • THE CAP HELPS STORE ENERGY LEADING TO HIGHER
    POTENTIAL BUOYANT ENERGY LATER IN THE DAY OR
    EVENING
  • BLUESTEIN AND JAIN (1985) HAVE SUGGESTED THAT
    SLIGHTLY STRONGER CIN UPSTREAM MIGHT SOMETIMES
    LEAD TO BACKBUILDING CONVECTION

23
MOVEMENT OF THE SYSTEM
  • SLOW MOVING SYSTEMS ARE USUALLY THE HEAVIEST
    RAINFALL PRODUCERS
  • AT SHORTER TIME RANGES-EXTRAPOLATION BASED ON
    RADAR AND SATELLITE PROVIDES PRIMARY GUIDANCE
  • AT LONGER RANGES, MODELS PROVIDE DECENT GUIDANCE
  • YOU STILL NEED TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT MODEL
    CHARACTERISTICS AND BIASES.
  • AT ALL TIME RANGES, YOU MUST ANTICIPATE WHEN NEW
    ACTIVITY MAY FORM UPSTREAM

24
Movement of a system is dependent on cell
movement and propagation
Actual cell motion
  • Individual convective cells usually move at
    around 90 of the mean wind with a slight
    deviation to the right
  • Propagation is dependent on how fast new cells
    form along some flank of the system

850-300 mb mean wind
Propagation, the rate new cells are forming
upstream
System movement
25
PROPOGATION IS ALSO DEPENDENT ON
  • OUTFLOW
  • EVAPORATIONAL COOLING RELATED TO THE
    ENVIRONMENTAL HUMIDITY
  • GUST FRONT SPEED RELATED TO TEMPERATURE DEFICIT
    BETWEEN OUTFLOW AND AIR AROUND IT.
  • HON-HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE GRADIENTS
  • INTERACTION OF UPDRAFT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL WIND
  • STORM RELATIVE WINDS
  • DETERMINES WHERE LOW LEVEL CONVERGENCE WILL BE
    LOCATED.

26
Schematic representing the affect the shape and
movement of a system has on the rainfall at a
particular point. The shaded colors on the
system represent the radar echoes.
You live at the blue dot
RAINFALL RATE
RAINFALL RATE
RAINFALL RATE
RAINFALL RATE
TIME
TIME
TIME
TIME
From Doswell et al., 1996 (Weather Forecasting,
11, 560-581)
27
When the moisture convergence is aligned with the
850-300 mb mean flow, a sizeable area of 3
precipitation is more likely.
THE Y-AXIS REPRESENTS THE LENGTH OF THE
-2X10-7 S-1 OR GREATER MOISTURE FLUX CONVERGENCE
MEASURED UPSTREAM ALONG A LINE DEFINED BY THE
MEAN FLOW.
3600 sq. nm
a 3 area is
less likely
area of 3 more likely
(inches)
28
During maturity, cells apparently move towards
the right. The active part of an MCC moves to
the right of the mean flow.
360
360
Right of mean flow
r.62
330
330
300
300
Observed cell direction during MCC maturity
Mean 850-300 mb wind direction
270
270
240
240
210
210
r.83
Right of mean flow
180
180
330
390
360
270
300
240
180
210
360
330
300
180
270
240
210
Observed direction of movement of the most active
part of MCS
Mean 850-300 mb wind direction
From Corfidi
29
The direction of the MBE (the most active part of
the MCS) is dependent on the direction of the
low-level jet (Corfidi et al., 1997) and on the
position of the most moist and unstable air
relative to the MCS.
The direction of propagation is in the opposite
direction of the low-level jet. This may be why
MCCs tend to track to the right of the mean wind.
Systems with propagation vectors between 0-120
degrees have been plotted between 360 and 480
degrees
From Corfidi
30
THE PROPAGATION OF A CONVECTIVE SYSTEM IS
DEPENDENT ON THE LOCATION OF 1) THE MOST
UNSTABLE AIR, 2) THE AXIS AND ORIENTATION OF
THE LOW-LEVEL JET, AND 3) THE LOCATION OF THE
STRONGEST LOW-LEVEL MOISTURE CONVERGENCE
1. FORWARD
DIRECTION OF PROPAGATION
MCS
AXIS OF LOW-LEVEL JET
UNSTABLE AIR
1000-500 THICKNESS
2. BACKWARD
N
E
W
ADOPTED FROM JIANG AND SCOFIELD, 1987
S
UNSTABLE AIR
31
THICKNESS CONSIDERATIONS
  • MCCS OFTEN TRACK ALONG THE 1000-500 MB THICKNESS
    LINES
  • THE AMOUNT OF MOISTURE NEEDED TO PRODUCE A LARGER
    SCALE MCS OR MCC APPEARS TO BE DEPENDENT ON THE
    1000-500 THICKNESS AND THE OBSERVED PW (Relative
    humidity)
  • RAINFALL OFTEN OCCURS ALONG A FAVORED THICKNESS
    CHANNEL
  • WATCH FOR MCC DEVELOPMENT AND HEAVY RAIN IN AREAS
    OF DIFLUENT THICKNESS

32
An example of a quasi-stationary convective system
The most unstable air is usually found upstream
of the initial convection during backbuilding or
quasi-stationary convective events
JUNKER AND SCNEIDER, 1997, NAT. WEA. DIGEST, ,21,
5-17
33
Factors favorable to quasi-stationary convection
1) mean winds that are directed slightly away
from the front,
2) a low-level 1e ridge to west, and
3) the location of the strongest moisture
convergence west of the initial convection
00Z
00Z
1000-850 mb layer mean moisture flux
(vectors)moisture flux magnitude (dashed) and
moisture flux divergence (-4 x10-7s-1 are
shaded), the red dot represents the location
where convection started
850-300 mb mean winds, 982 mb equivalent
potential temperature (dashed) and msl pressure
(solid)
JUNKER AND SCNEIDER, 1997, NAT. WEA. DIGEST, ,21,
5-17
34
MOISTURE CONVERGENCE STRENGTHENS OVER EASTERN NE
AS PRESSURES FALL IN RESPONSE TO THE APPROACH OF
A WEAK SURFACE WAVE
MSL PRESSURE (THICK SOLID), MOISTURE CONVERGENCE
(HIGHEST VALUES SHADED), RED DOT IS WHERE INITIAL
CELL FORMED
THE WIND AND MOISTURE CONVERGENCE FIELDS CAN
CHANGE RAPIDLY AS A RESULT OF PRESSURE RISES OR
FALLS. THE CORFIDI VECTOR METHOD MAY NOT CATCH
RAPID CHANGES IN THE WIND FIELD.
35
DURING THE 1993 DSM FLASH FLOOD, THE CONVECTIVE
SYSTEM REMAINED STATIONARY FOR ABOUT 9 HOURS, WHY?
Accumulated precipitation from the storm
36
FACTORS THAT LEAD TO TRAINING OR REGENERATION OF
CONVECTION
  • A SLOW MOVING LOW-LEVEL BOUNDARY OR FRONT
  • A QUASI-STATIONARY LOW-LEVEL JET
  • A QUASI-STATIONARY AREA OF UPPER-LEVEL DIVERGENCE
  • A LOW-LEVEL BOUNDARY (MOISTURE CONVERGENCE)
    ALMOST PARALLEL TO THE MEAN FLOW
  • LACK OF STRONG VERTICAL SHEAR

37
Even if you know an MCS will form and know how it
will move, it is extremely difficult to predict
where 3 inches or more of rain will fall
From Kane et al., 1987
Cluster around propagation axis the probability
of 1 mm of rain is 100 but for 75 mm drops to
10 (red area)
38
The probability of 1 in 6 hours (heavy rainfall)
is low (from Charba 1985). How do you predict 4
inches in 24 hours?
39
Forecasts were best with large storms. Studies
were made of the relationship of various contour
intervals to other ones.
Larue and Younkin, Mon. Wea. Rev. (1963)
Found that most of the volume for a typical large
volume storm was due to coverage of rainfall
amounts that were 1 inch or less less
40
PATTERN RECOGNITION, IS THIS A MADDOX FRONTAL
TYPE EVENT?
WARM FRONT?
WHAT IS THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE 500H SHORTWAVE
APPROACHING THE RIDGE AXIS?
41
BOUNDARY LAYER WIND AND TEMPERATURE FORECAST V.T.
00Z 18 JULY
THE WHITE LINE INDICATES A THERMAL BOUNDARY THAT
SHOWS UP IN THE FORECAST
42
A STRONG LOW LEVEL JET IS PRESENT WITH LOTS OF
MOISTURE
DO YOU THINK THERE WILL BE A SIZEABLE 3 AREA?
IS IT TIME TO CALL EMERGENCY MANAGERS? FOR WHICH
STATE? MINNESOTA? WISCONSIN? IOWA? ILLINOIS?
43
OOZ 18 JULY FORECASTS OF
250 JET AND DIVERGENCE
BEST LI AND BOUNDARY LAYER WINDS
A SHORTWAVE AND JET STREAK IS APPROACHING THE
RIDGE. UNSTABLE LIS ALONG THE SURFACE BOUNDARY
44
IS THIS A GOOD QPF? DO YOU THINK THE RAINFALL IS
ORIENTED CORRECTLY
WOULD YOU PREDICT MORE RAINFALL THAN 2 .5 FOR A
MAX? WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THE PLACEMENT OF
THE RAINFALL?
45
REMEMBER TO LOOK FOR LOW-LEVEL BOUNDARIES. NOTICE
THE THERMAL GRADIENT OVER IL
RUC SURFACE WINDS, TEMPERATURES AND MOISTURE
CONVERGENCE
RUC MOISTURE FLUX FORECAST V.T. 06Z
THE LAKE BREEZE FRONT FOCUSSED CONVECTION OVER
ILLINOIS
46
HOW DID YOU DO? THIS IS FAIRLY TYPICAL OF OUR
HANDLING OF MCCS. WE OFTEN KNOW WHEN ONE WILL
FORM BUT USUALLY MISS THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE
HEAVIEST RAINFALL.
MODEL FORECAST
OBSERVED
6 OR MORE
3 OR MORE
1 OR MORE
47
SHORT RANGE (0-6 HR) FORECASTS
  • RELY PRIMARILY ON CURRENT OBSERVATIONS AND TRENDS
  • NEXRAD AND SATELLITE IMAGERY ARE GREAT TOOLS
    PROVIDING INFORMATION ON THE , SIZE AND INTENSITY
    AND MOVEMENT OF PRECIPITATION SYSTEMS
  • HAVE TO KNOW LIMITATIONS OF OBSERVING SYSTEMS
  • STILL HAVE TO ANTICIPATE NON-LINEAR CHANGES
  • NEW CELLS FORMING UPSTREAM

48
RADAR IS A GREAT TOOL FOR MAKING SHORT RANGE
FORECASTS
  • NEXRAD SUPPLIES ESTIMATES OF RAINFALL RATES,
    ACCUMULATIONS
  • HIGH TEMPORAL AND SPACIAL RESOLUTION
  • RADAR SUPPLIES ESTIMATES BETWEEN RAIN GUAGES.
  • YOU CAN LOOP IMAGES TO SEE
  • CELL/SYSTEM MOVEMENT
  • WHETHER CELLS ARE TRAINING
  • DESPITE STRENGTHS, KNOW LIMITATIONS

49
LIMITATIONS OF THE THE NEXRAD ESTIMATES
  • BEAM MAY OVERSHOOT MAXIMUM REFLECTIVITY
  • BEAM BLOCKAGE
  • BRIGHT BANDING AND HAIL CONTAMINATION
  • THE MAXIMUM THRESHOLD REFLECTIVITY (USUALLY 53
    dBZ)
  • VARIATION OF Z-R RELATIONSHIPS
  • DEPENDENT ON DROPLET SIZE AND DISTRIBUTION
  • BEWARE OF TROPICAL AIRMASSES

50
HOW THE UPPER LEVEL JET AFFECTS WEATHER SYSTEMS
  • JET STEAKS HAVE BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH
  • VARIATIONS IN STRENGTH OF THE LOW-LEVEL JET
  • CYCLOGENESIS AND MAJOR SNOWSTORMS
  • FRONTOGENESIS
  • REMEMBER CURVATURE AND CHANGES IN THE WIND SPEED
    ARE BOTH IMPORTANT

51
Vertical motion at 600 mb, for jets with various
curvatures, The dark solid line depicts the axis
of the jet streak
Note for the anticyclonic case the curvature
tends to nudge the max vertical motion towards
the ridge axis.
From Moore and Vanknowe, 1992
52
THE UPPER LEVEL JET AND CYCLONES
wind
max
  • THE STARS REPRESENT WHERE CYCLONES DEVELOPED. THE
    LINES ARE 250 MB ISOTACHS

53
JET STREAKS AND CYCLOGENESIS
  • MOST LOWS TO THE LEE OF NORTH-SOUTH MOUNTAIN
    RANGES FORM ALONG THE LEFT EXIT REGION OF A
    STREAK
  • THE LOW LEVEL JET IS ENHANCED DUE TO THE
    ISALLOBARIC WINDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PRESSURE
    FALLS
  • THE LOW LEVEL WINDS ALSO STRENGTHEN IN RESPONSE
    TO THE INCREASE IN PRESSURE GRADIENT
  • THE DIFFERENTIAL TEMPERATURE AND MOISTURE
    ADVECTIONS ACT TO DESTABILIZE THE AIR MASS

54
200 mb composites wind and isotach field for
occurrence of MCC (left) and Persistent elongated
convective systems(PECS) (right)
PECS OCCUR WITH STRONGER SHORTWAVES THAT MOVED
OUT OF THE MOUNTAINS. BUT DO NOT LAST AS LONG
AS MCCS
LOW LEVEL FRONTOGENSESIS IS ENHANCED BY LOWER
BRANCH OF TRANVERSE CIRCULATION
From Anderson and Arritt, MWR 1998
55
IMPORTANCE OF THE LOW LEVEL JET
  • SPEED CONVERGENCE IS MAXIMIZED AT THE NOSE OF THE
    JET, CONFLUENT LOW FLOW IS OFTEN PRESENT ALONG
    AXIS OF LLJ
  • THE VERTICAL FLUX OF MOISTURE IS OFTEN RELATED TO
    THE STRENGTH OF THE LOW LEVEL JET (LLJ)
  • DIFFERENTIAL MOISTURE AND TEMPERATURE ADVECTION
    CAN LEAD TO RAPID DESTABILIZATION
  • A QUASI-STATIONARY LLJ SUPPORTS THE REGENERATION
    OF CELLS AND/OR TRAINING OF CELLS
  • THE LLJ IS OFTEN LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST OF
    WESTERN FLANK OF A BACKWARD-PROPAGATING MCS.

56
Tropical Storm Conceptual Model
Region A the rainfall maximum along the front
north of the system where the tropical moisture
interacts with the westerly flow. The maximum is
usually along or north of the frontal boundary
and may be along the right entrance region of a
jet streak.

Region B the other principal area of heavy
rainfall associated with Agnes. One heavy area is
usually located slightly to the right of the
track of the storm.
From Bosart and Carr, 1978
57
Rainfall with tropical systems
  • Max rainfall 100/storm speed (old rule of
    thumb)
  • amounts of pre-existing moisture is important in
    governing rainfall potential
  • as system makes landfall, max rainfall is usually
    located along the region of max inflow just to
    the east of the center.
  • As the storm decays, heaviest precipitation often
    shifts to northwest side of storm especially if
    it is interacting with westerlies
  • watch for nighttime core rains near center
    center may be deceptively inactive during the
    day.
  • Tropical moisture associated with storm sometimes
    interacts with fronts north and east of the
    system (event if the system is hundreds of miles
    away.
  • Pacific systems moving northeastward from Mexico
    can cause heavy rains well ahead of the center
    (can focus on a front in the Southern Plains.

58
More on tropical systems
  • For wet ones they found
  • They were associated either with a weak 200 mb
    trough to the west which supplied upper
    divergence across the area
  • Or were associated with the right entrance of an
    upper level jet streak
  • The wettest TS Amelia d produced 1200 mm (about
    48 inches.)
  • Dry ones
  • Moved fast
  • And or were located along the wrong quadrant on
    an upper level wind max (usually the right exit
    region)

59
RULES OF THUMB FOR PREDICTING HEAVY RAIN
  • THE MAXIMUM RAINFALL USUALLY OCCURS WHERE THE
    CENTER OF THE STRONGEST INFLOW INTERSECTS A
    BOUNDARY
  • THE RAINFALL MAXIMUM USUALLY OCCURS JUST
    NORTHEAST OF THE THETAE RIDGE
  • IN SUMMER, THE HEAVIEST RAINFALL OFTEN OCCURS
    ALONG OUTFLOW BOUNDARIES SOUTH OF THE WARM FRONT

60
RULES OF THUMB CONTINUED
  • INVERTED ISOBARS ALONG A FRONT CAN SIGNAL HEAVY
    RAINFALL POTENTIAL
  • HEAVY RAIN OFTEN FALLS IN AN AREA OF THICKNESS
    DIFLUENCE
  • BEWARE OF THICKNESS LINES WHICH HOLD STEADY OR
    SINK SOUTHWARD IN LOW LEVEL SOUTHERLY FLOW
  • HEAVY RAINFALL SOMETIMES FALLS IN A PREFERRED
    THICKNESS CHANNEL

61
RULES OF THUMB CONTINUED
  • MCSs TRACK ALONG OF SLIGHTLY TO THE RIGHT OF THE
    1000-500 THICKNESS LINES
  • LOOK FOR CONVECTION ALONG THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF
    THE WESTERLIES
  • MCCs OFTEN FORM NEAR THE UPPER LEVEL RIDGE AXIS
    WHERE THERE IS WEAK INERTIAL STABILITY
  • WATCH FOR HEAVY CONVECTION BEHIND A VORTICITY
    MAXIMUM OR NEAR A VORTICITY MINIMUM WHEN STRONG
    THERMAL AND MOISTURE ADVECTION IS PRESENT

62
MORE RULES OF THUMB
  • A FAVORABLE JET STRUCTURE CAN ENHANCE THE HEAVY
    RAIN POTENTIAL
  • K INDICES ARE A GOOD MEASURE OF DEEP MOISTURE,
    BEWARE OF K INDICES IN THE UPPER 30S
  • THE MAXIMUM RAINFALL IS USUALLY WITH THE TROPICAL
    CORE OF A TROPICAL SYSTEM AT NIGHT, RATHER THAN
    THE DAYTIME PERIPHERAL ACTIVITY
  • BEWARD OF TROPICAL CONNECTIONS AS OBSERVED FROM
    WATER VAPOR IMAGERY

63
MORE RULES OF THUMB
  • BEWARE OF SLOW MOVING SYNOPTIC CIRCULATION
    (SHARS) EVENTS, THEY OFTEN HAVE WARM CLOUD TOPS
  • STRONG HEIGHT FALLS AND/OR FAST MOVING SYSTEMS
    USUALLY PRECLUDE VERY HEAVY RAINFALL, INSTEAD
    THEY PRODUCE A LARGE AREA OF MORE MODEST RAINFALL
    (AN INCH OR TWO)
  • NUMERICAL MODELS USUALLY DONT PREDICT THE AXIS
    OF HEAVIEST RAINFALL FAR ENOUGH SOUTH (OUTFLOW
    BOUNDARIES)
  • THE NGM RARELY PREDICTS OVER 3 INCHES OF RAIN

64
References
  • H. B. Bluestein and M. H. Jain, 1985Formation of
    mesoscale lines of precipitation Severe squall
    lines in Oklahoma during the spring. J. Atmos.
    Sci., 42, 1711.
  • S. F. Corfidi, J. H. Merritt, and J. M. Fritsch,
    1996, Predicting the movement of mesoscale
    convective complexes. Wea. Forecasting, 11,
    41-46.
  • C. A. Doswell III, H.E. Brooks and R. A. Maddox,
    1996 Flash Flood Forecasting An ingredients
    based methodology. Wea. Forecasting, 11,
    560-581.
  • Chappell, C., 1986, Quasi-stationary convective
    events. Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting.
    P. S. Raym Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 289-310.
  • J. T. Moore and G, E, Vanknowe, 1992, The effect
    of the jet-streak curvature on kinematic fields.
    Mon. Wea. Rev. 120, 2429-2441.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com