Title: Protected Areas and Managing Parks from an Ecosystems Perspective Case Study: Kruger National Park, South Africa
1Protected Areas and Managing Parks from an
Ecosystems PerspectiveCase StudyKruger
National Park, South Africa
C. Pringle Lecture ECL 6080, 22 October 2009
2(No Transcript)
3Basic Principles of Good Ecological Management
- Critical ecological processes must be maintained
- -key species management
- -habitat or ecosystem management
- B. Goals and objectives must derive from a deep
understanding of the ecological properties of the
system - -you cant effectively manage what
you dont understand - -be eternally vigilant for
unintended consequences of - management
- C. Minimize external threats and maximize
external benefits - D. Conserve evolutionary processes
- -keep populations large enough to
ensure against stochastic - causes of extinction
- -ensure species retain sufficient
genetic diversity to permit - adaptation to changing
environment
4Playing God Management decisions
The control of nature is a phrase conceived in
arrogance, born of the Neanderthal age of
biology and the convenience of man
Rachel Carson (1907-1964)
Silent Spring (1962) Man, in
the words of one astute biologist, is faced with
the problem of escaping from his own
ingenuity. Loren Eisely
(1907-1977) Conservation is a bird that flies
faster than the shot we aim at it. Aldo
Leolpold 1953
5- Case Study
- Kruger National Park,
- South Africa
- Linking population and community
- ecology to ecosystem-level
- management of a protected area
- Importance of watershed management
- and minimizing hydrological effects
- originating outside of park boundaries
- National and international pressures
- faced by park managers in Kruger
- Contrast with US park management
- View from the socioeconomic context
- of Africa and make contrasts with US.
6Kruger is the largest of the 22 South African
National Park (SANParks government body
responsible for managing national parks)
7A Purist Approach
The precursor to SANParks - the National Parks
Board - historically had a purist approach from
that of other conservation organizations
- core areas of national parks considered
sacrosanct and managed with as little
deviation from natural ecological
processes as possible - example game
allowed to die naturally in parks during
droughts in contrast to the alternative of
culling and selling meat cheaply or donating it
to local black communities -
principal at stake was natural selection
8- 20,000 km2
- (half the size of Switzerland)
- Employs almost 4,000 people
- 1.2 million visitors/yr
- Park extends from north-
- to south (350 km) and is
- bisected by 7 major rivers
- that run from west to east.
- 300 tree species
- 49 fish species
- 33 amphibian species
- 118 reptile species
- 492 bird species
- 147 mammal species
- - elephants
9(No Transcript)
10There is a fence around the park with 8 access
gates
11(No Transcript)
12The Gardeners of Eden Syndrome?
13The Gardeners of Eden Syndrome?
14- Intensive water abstraction has
- made some perennial rivers
- ephemeral for prolonged periods
- of time
15(No Transcript)
16- Crocodiles and hippos
- vulnerable to reduced
- water flows
- Keystone species which
- Play an important role
- in structuring riverine
- ecosystems and their
- loss can trigger
- cascading events in
- both aquatic and
- terrestrial foodwebs
17While elephants can dig down to water
in dessicated river beds..
18 Most herbivorous mammals live within 6 km of
surface water and water dependence is a major
factor limiting their abundance
19To increase available habitat - park
managers provided artificial watering holes in
formerly waterless areas between major rivers.
20This altered the population dynamics of many
species and resulted in increased herbivore
populations
21followed by catastrophic collapses of the
inflated herbivore populations (e.g., in 1966
and 1983) which became food- limited resulting
in damaged vegetation - especially near rivers -
and..
22.temporary increases in carnivores and
scavengers for a year or two after the herbivore
population collapses followed by their
subsequent collapse as their food disappeared
23Kruger Park managers have largely stopped using
groundwater fed watering holes between
rivers to increase carrying capacity of park for
wildlife
24The elephant situation in Kruger - too much
of a good thing?
25African elephant 3-5 million elephants in
Africa in 1930s and 1940s
-habitat loss and heavy ivory poaching in
1970s and 1980s
-between 400,000- 660,000 elephants left in
Africa today
26- The elephant management controversy
- in Krueger National Park
- currently 12,000 elephants in park
reproducing at 6-8 per year - some believe that the parks habitat can
only sustain 7,000 elephants over a long period
different theories - -elephants consume 440 lbs of plant
matter in a single day and are - causing major changes to the
vegetation of the park, destroying trees - and reducing habitat available for
other species - increased problems from human-elephant
conflicts elephants break the parks boundary
fences and eat crops buffalo escape (buffalo
vectors for foot and mouth disease and bovine
tuberculosis in livestock) elephant attacks. - options for elephant population control
- -translocation to under-populated
areas - -contraception
- -establishment of trans-frontier
conservation corridors - and protected areas
- -annual culling
-
27What has happened in other areas when elephant
populations increase? In northern Botswana there
are an estimated 100,000-plus elephants growing
at a rate of 5 per yr and damaging vegetation
in protected areas such as Chobe National Park
28Culling in Kruger practiced from
1960s-1995 500-600 elephants killed/yr To
maintain population between 7,000-8,000
Give hunting quotas to local communities?
29 The Cultural Context of Management
Decisions
Balancing the African philosophy with
western ideals to protect international
tourism If it pays - it stays..there is
something wrong when the opportunity to produce
hundreds of tons of meat a year is spurned on the
grounds of sentimentality
30(No Transcript)
31 Rogue elephants and the importance of
matriarchy and clans
young single and out of control Rhinos are
being murdered and the killers are juvenile
delinquents of the elephantine kind
Rhino bashing
article in NY TIMES October 1997
32Contraception costly primarily funded by
international agencies
33 Elephant translocation expensive and labor
intensive - up to 14 transferred at a
time - translocating one elephant can cost
as much as US 8,000
34Establishment of trans-frontier conservation
areas to conserve elephants
-plan to establish an International Park via
cross-border collaboration Between Mozambique,
South Africa and Zimbabwe -would expand
protected area from 20,000 to 35,000 km2 -
hopefully leading to the development of a larger
Transfrontier Conservation Area of 99,800 km2
with a mosaic of different land
uses -international funding from Germany, World
Bank, USAID, IUCN, and Peace Parks
Foundation -involves the translocation of
1000 Elephants in Kruger to Mozambique
35What does the future hold for elephants?
- WWF launched its African Elephant Programme in
2000 - -increase protection and management of
elephants in Africa - -build capacity within elephant range
countries to manage and - mitigate conflict between humans
and elephants - -control illegal trade in elephant products
- CITES says No to ivory stockpile sale in Oct
2006 (after giving Botswana, Namibia and South
Africa permission in 2002 to sell 60 tons despite
widespread opposition by many governments and
NGOs). Conservation groups are concerned that
any relaxation on - the ban on ivory will result in a explosion
in both demand and supply of ivory, and a
flooding of the market of both legal and illegal
stocks which translates to tens of thousands of
slaughtered elephants.
36- Effects of human activities
- outside of the park
- - Water abstraction from rivers
- (1.5 million people live near Kruger in
- South Africa and several hundred
- thousand in bordering Mozambique)
- irrigation farming
- tree farming
- - Water pollution and erosion
- cattle grazing
- mining
- large towns and cities
- industrial activities
- Acid Rain (coal burning in cities
- SW of the park result in harmful
- acid deposition in park
37Communities west of Kruger
38Sugar plantations south of Kruger
39Irrigation of sugarcane plantations
40Highlands irrigated crops to the west of
Kruger
41Reservoirs in rivers upstream of Kruger
42Exotic Eucalyptus plantations west of Kruger in
highlands
43Tea plantation west of Kruger in higlands
44Worker homes at tea plantation
45(No Transcript)
46- Management solutions for Kruger Parks water
- quantity and quality problems establishing water
- rights for nature
- Changing operating criteria of existing dams
outside and upstream - of Kruger to release water at critical periods
and also to minimize - effects of salts and smothering sediments
- Constructing additional dams to better regulate
water flow into the - park during low flows.
- Working with local stakeholders (industries to
recycle effluents - mine operators divert streams around mine
operations) - 4. Environmental outreach activities and local
environmental activist - groups (e.g. Olifants River Forum)
- Working with government (Department of Water
Affairs) to treat - acid waters emanating from abandoned mines to
place holds on all
47National pressures facing managers of Kruger Park
- Human rights issues
- -improving affirmative action programs,
equal - employment opportunities and
non-discriminatory - wage structure
- Changes in elite culture of traditional park
- administration and management
- C. Environmental outreach - involving an
alienated and - often disinterested national majority
- D. Maintenance of financial self-sufficiency
48International pressures
- Wildlife management across international
boundaries - (Mozambique, Zimbabwe)
- 1. international cooperation to
establish trans - boundary protected area
- 2. control of poaching and human
invasions - B. International Animal Rights Groups
- 1. elephant relocation (versus
culling) -
- 2. development and implementation
of large - mammal birth control
49Food for thought
Would the creation of Kruger National Park have
been possible in the absence of apartheid? Can
its continued existence be maintained in light
of social, political and economic
concerns? What else can be done to insure the
perpetuity of this Park?