????(Make to stock) (push system)?????? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

????(Make to stock) (push system)??????

Description:

For example, the furniture industry. How can production be pull ... A pull strategy at the production and distribution stages and push at the retail outlets. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: ceNt7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ????(Make to stock) (push system)??????


1
??1
  • ????(Make to stock) (push system)??????
  • ????? vs. ?????????????
  • ???Coca Cola???
  • ???????
  • ??POS (pull system) ?????????

2
??2which one is better?1
Push system
Pull system
??
??
3
??2which one is better?2
??
??
4
6.1 Introduction1
  • Effective SCM implies
  • Efficient integration of suppliers,
    manufacturers, warehouses, and stores.
  • Coordinate activities across the supply chain
  • Improve performance reduce cost, increase
    service level, reduce the bullwhip effect, better
    utilize resources, and effectively respond to
    changes in the market place.

5
6.1 Introduction2
  • Various supply chain integration strategies
  • Push, pull, pushpull strategy.
  • Matching products and industries with supply
    chain strategies.
  • Demand-driven supply chain strategies.
  • The impact of the Internet on supply chain
    integration.

6
6.2 Push, Pull, Push-Pull Systems
  • Push and Pull traditional categories of
    manufacturing operations
  • More recent hybrid strategy of combining the two,
    Push-Pull systems

7
Push-Based Supply Chains1
  • Production and distribution decisions based on
    long-term forecasts.
  • Manufacturer demand forecasts based on orders
    received from the retailers warehouses.

8
Push-Based Supply Chains2
  • Longer reaction time to changing marketplace
  • Inability to meet changing demand patterns.
  • ??,NOKIA????????????
  • ??,???????????????Ultra Book However, ipad
    ???????
  • Obsolescence of supply chain inventory as demand
    for certain products disappears.
  • ??,DRAM

9
Push-Based Supply Chains3
  • Longer reaction time to changing marketplace
  • Variability of orders received much larger than
    the variability in customer demand due to the
    bullwhip effect.
  • Excessive inventories due to the need for large
    safety stocks
  • Larger and more variable production
    batches(??????????????)
  • Unacceeptable service levels
  • Product obsolescence

10
Bullwhip Effect in Push-Based Supply Chains
  • Leads to inefficient resource utilization
  • Planning and managing are much more difficult.
  • Not clear how a manufacturer should determine
    production capacity? Transportation capacity?
  • Peak demand?
  • Average demand?
  • Results
  • Higher transportation costs
  • Higher inventory levels and/or higher
    manufacturing costs
  • more emergency production changeovers

11
Pull-Based Supply Chains1
  • Production and distribution demand driven
  • Coordinated with true customer demand rather than
    forecast demand
  • firm does not hold any inventory and only
    responds to specific orders.

12
Pull-Based Supply Chains2
  • Intuitively attractive
  • Reduced lead times through the ability to better
    anticipate incoming orders from the retailers.
  • Reduced inventory since inventory levels decrease
    with lead times
  • Less variability in the system
  • Decreased inventory at the manufacturer due to
    the reduction in variability.

13
Problems of Pull-Based Systems
  • Difficult to implement when lead times are so
    long that it is impractical to react to demand
    information
  • Harder to leverage economies of scale
  • Doesnt work in all cases ? ???mini,??????

14
Push-Pull Strategy
  • Some stages of the supply chain operated in a
    push-based manner
  • typically the initial stages
  • Remaining stages employ a pull-based strategy.
  • Interface between the push-based stages and the
    pull-based stages is the pushpull boundary.

15
Push-Pull Supply Chains
16
Consider Two PC Manufacturers
  • Build to Stock
  • Forecast demand
  • Buys components
  • Assembles computers
  • Observes demand and meets demand if possible.
  • A traditional push system
  • Build to order
  • Forecast demand
  • Buys components
  • Observes demand
  • Assembles computers
  • Meets demand
  • A push-pull system
  • The push-pull boundary is at the beginning of
    assemble.

17
General Strategy
  • Make a part of the product to stock generic
    product (CPU,DRAM)
  • The point where differentiation has to be
    introduced is the push-pull boundary
  • Based on extent of customization, the position of
    the boundary on the timeline is decided

18
Push-Pull Strategies? Advantage of the rules of
forecasting
  • Forecasts are always wrong (pull strategy)
  • The longer the forecast horizon the worst is the
    forecast (finished goods) (push-pull boundary)
  • Aggregate forecasts are more accurate
    (components) (push strategy)
  • The Risk Pooling Concept

19
Push-Pull Strategies?Postponement
  • The firm designs the product and the
    manufacturing process so that decisions about
    which specific product is being manufactured can
    be delayed as long as possible.
  • The portion of the supply chain prior to product
    differentiation is typically operated using a
    push-based strategy.
  • The portion of the supply chain starting from the
    time of differentiation is pull-based.

20
What is the Best Strategy about Push Pull
Strategy?

H L
L H
Economies of Scale
21
Selecting the Best SC Strategy1
  • Higher demand uncertainty suggests pull
  • Higher importance of economies of scale suggests
    push
  • High uncertainty/ EOS not important (Box I) such
    as the computer industry implies pull (??,Dell
    Computer)
  • Low uncertainty/ EOS important (Box III) such as
    groceries implies push
  • Demand is stable
  • Transportation cost reduction is critical
  • Pull would not be appropriate here.
  • ??,????

22
Selecting the Best SC Strategy2
  • Low uncertainty but low value of economies of
    scale (Box IV)(high volume books and cds
    (???????)
  • Either push strategies or push/pull strategies
    might be most appropriate
  • High uncertainty and high value of economies of
    scale (Box II)
  • For example, the furniture industry
  • How can production be pull but delivery push?
  • Is this a pull-push system?

23
????
  • ???CD?push or push-pull????????
  • ??????????????(push)
  • ??????????????,???,???????(push-pull)
  • ?????????????(pull) ,???????,???????????????,?????
    ????(push)???????

24
Push-Pull Strategy ? Case Study
  • Coca cola
  • ???(???????????)(????)(??????POS?EOS)
  • McDonalds
  • Sport Obermeyer (example 6-3, p.196)
  • Low-risk products ? push strategy
  • High-risk products ? push-pull strategy
  • ?????
  • ????????????????????? push-pull strategy
  • ????? push strategy

25
Characteristics and Skills
Raw Material
Customers
Push
Pull
  • Low
  • High Uncertainty
  • Short Cycle Times
  • Service Level
  • Responsiveness
  • Order fulfillment
  • High
  • Low Uncertainty
  • Long Lead Times
  • Cost Minimization
  • Resource Allocation
  • Supply chain planning

Complexity Uncertainty Lead time Objective Focus P
rocesses
26
Locating the Push-Pull Boundary1
  • The push section
  • Uncertainty is relatively low
  • Economies of scale important
  • Long lead times
  • Complex supply chain structures
  • Thus
  • Management based on forecasts is appropriate
  • Focus is on cost minimization
  • Achieved by effective resource utilization
    supply chain optimization
  • ??,IC??

27
Locating the Push-Pull Boundary2
  • The pull section
  • High uncertainty
  • Simple supply chain structure
  • Short lead times
  • Thus
  • Reacting to realized demand is important
  • Focus on service level
  • Flexible and responsive approaches
  • ??,????

28
Locating the Push-Pull Boundary3
  • The push section requires
  • Supply chain planning
  • Long term strategies
  • The pull section requires
  • Order fulfillment processes
  • Customer relationship management
  • Buffer inventory at the boundaries
  • The output of the tactical planning process
  • The input to the order fulfillment process.

29
??
  • ??????push-pull boundary?????
  • ?????push (???????????)
  • ?????pull(?????????????????)
  • www.scubastore.com

30
Locating the Push-Pull Boundary4
31
6.3 The Impact of Lead Time1
  • Longer the lead time, more important it is to
    implement a push based strategy.
  • Typically difficult to implement a pull strategy
    when lead times are so long that it is hard to
    react to demand information.

32
Impact of Lead Time2
FIGURE 6-10 Matching supply chain strategies
with products the impact of lead time and demand
uncertainty
33
Impact of Lead Time3
  • Box A
  • Items with short lead time and high demand
    uncertainty
  • Pull strategy should be applied as much as
    possible.
  • Box B
  • Items with long supply lead time and low demand
    uncertainty.
  • Appropriate supply chain strategy is push.

34
????
  • ??? vs. ?????? ? short lead time and high demand
    uncertainty vs. long lead time and low demand
    uncertainty ? pull vs. push

35
Impact of Lead Time4
  • Box C
  • items with short supply lead time and highly
    predictable demand.
  • Continuous replenishment strategy
  • Suppliers receive POS data
  • They use these data to prepare shipments at
    previously agreed-upon intervals
  • A pull strategy at the production and
    distribution stages and push at the retail
    outlets.
  • ??,???????????????(??????)

36
Impact of Lead Time5
  • Box D
  • Items with lead times are long and unpredictable
    demand
  • Inventory is critical in this type of environment
  • Requires positioning inventory strategically in
    the supply chain

37
????
  • ??? vs. Blu-ray ? short lead time and low demand
    uncertainty vs. long lead time and high demand
    uncertainty ? continuous replenishment vs.
    inventory positioning

38
6.4 Demand-Driven Strategies
  • Requires integrating demand information into the
    supply chain planning process
  • Demand forecast
  • Use historical demand data to develop long-term
    estimates of expected demand
  • Demand shaping
  • Firm determines the impact of various marketing
    plans such as promotion, pricing discounts,
    rebates, new product introduction, and product
    withdrawal on demand forecasts.

39
Effect of forecast error
  • ??????????????????????,???????????,???????????

40
???????
  • ??????(mean absolute deviation, MAD)
  • ????(mean squared error, MSE)
  • ?????????(mean absolute percent error, MAPE)

41
?????1????
  • ?????(Center Line, CL)CL0
  • ????(Upper Control Limit, UCL)
  • ????(Lower Control Limit, LCL)

42
?????2?????
  • ??????????????????
  • ???0????,??4???5????????????????????????,?????????
    ???,??????????
  • ???????MAD??,?????????MAD

43
?????????
  • ???-????????????????????????? ????? ???
  • ?????????????????????????(???)
  • ???????????????????????????
  • ????????????????,???????????????????????
  • Collaborative Planning Forecasting and
    replenishment, CPFR)

44
??
  • 3DS????
  • ??????????????

45
??
  • ???? vs. ????
  • ???? ? ?? ? ???? vs. ?????????
  • ??????? (click-and-mortar) vs. ?????
    (brick-and-mortar)
  • ??,??????????
  • ??????? vs. ??????

46
????
  • ?????????,?????? ? ???? (the long tail)
  • ??
  • ????80?????400???,??1400???????????
  • 7net
  • ??
  • ?????!?????LV??? ????2?

47
??
  • Amazon ???

48
6.5 The Impact of the Internet on Supply Chain
Strategies1
  • Expectation that increasing use of the internet
    would solve a lot of the business problems
  • However, reality was very different
  • Many of the problems in the internet-based
    businesses were related to logistics strategies

49
????
  • ?????
  • ???? vs. ?????????????
  • ????????,????

50
The Impact of the Internet on Supply Chain
Strategies2
  • E-business strategies were supposed to
  • Reduce cost
  • Increase service level
  • Increase flexibility
  • Increase profit

51
Reality is downfall
  • Peapod Example
  • Founded 1989
  • 140,000 members, largest on-line grocer
  • Revenue tripled to 73 million in 1999
  • 1st Quarter of 2000 25M Sales, Loss 8M

52
Reality is successful
  • Dell Example
  • Dell Computer has outperformed the competition in
    terms of shareholder value growth over the eight
    years period, 1988-1996, by over 3,000 (see
    Anderson and Lee, 1999)
  • Amazon.com Example
  • Founded in 1995 1st Internet purchase for most
    people
  • 1996 16M Sales, 6M Loss
  • 1999 1.6B Sales, 720M Loss
  • 2000 2.7B Sales, 1.4B Loss
  • 2005 Revenue reached 8.49B with total profit of
    359M

53
What is E-Business?1
  • E-business is a collection of business models and
    processes motivated by Internet technology, and
    focusing on improving the extended enterprise
    performance
  • E-commerce is the ability to perform major
    commerce transactions electronically

54
What is E-Business?2
  • e-commerce is part of e-Business
  • Internet technology is the driver of the business
    change
  • The focus of E-Business is on the extended
    enterprise
  • Intra-organizational
  • Business to Consumer (B2C)
  • Business to Business (B2B)

55
The Grocery Industry
  • From Push Systems...
  • Supermarket supply chain
  • ...To Pull Systems
  • Peapod, 1989-1999
  • Picks inventory from stores
  • Stock outs 8 to 10
  • And, finally to Push-Pull Systems
  • Peapod, 1999-present
  • Dedicated warehouses allow risk pooling (covers a
    geographical area larger than the one covered by
    an individual supermarket)
  • Stock outs less than 2

56
Challenges for On-line Grocery Stores
  • Transportation cost
  • Density of customers
  • Very short order cycle times
  • Less than 12 hours
  • Difficult to compete on cost
  • Must provide some added value such as convenience
  • Is a push-pull strategy appropriate?
  • What might be a better strategy?
  • Low demand uncertainty, high economies of scale
    (transportation cost) push strategy is better?
  • ??,???

57
Less than 300,000 shoppers
Source D. Ratliff
58
A New Type of Home Grocer
  • grocerystreet.com
  • On-line window for retailers
  • The on-line grocer picks products at the store
  • Customer can pick products at the store or pay
    for delivery
  • Yahoo????

59
The Book Selling Industry
  • From Push Systems...
  • Barnes and Noble
  • ...To Pull Systems
  • Amazon.com, 1996-1999
  • No inventory, used Ingram to meet most demand
  • Why?
  • And, finally to Push-Pull Systems
  • Amazon.com, 1999-present
  • 7 warehouses, 3M sq. ft.,
  • Why the switch?
  • Volume grew
  • Profit margins ?, service level ?, etc.

60
Direct-to-ConsumerCost Trade-Off
61
Industry BenchmarksNumber of Distribution
Centers
Food Companies
Chemicals
Pharmaceuticals
Avg. of WH
3
14
25
- High margin product - Service not important (or
easy to ship express) - Inventory
expensive relative to transportation
- Low margin product - Service very important -
Outbound transportation expensive relative to
inbound
Sources CLM 1999, Herbert W. Davis Co
LogicTools
62
The Retail Industry
  • Brick-and-mortar (?????) companies establish
    virtual retail stores ? click-and mortar
    (???????)
  • Wal-Mart, K-Mart , Barnes , 7-11 (7net)
  • An effective approach - hybrid stocking strategy
  • High volume/fast moving products for local
    storage
  • Low volume/slow moving products for browsing and
    purchase on line (risk pooling)

63
??
  • Another case ??????
  • ??????????
  • 7net

64
??
  • ????? vs. Coca Cola

65
E-Fulfillment
  • How have strategies changed?
  • From shipping cases to single items (????????)
  • From shipping to a relatively small number of
    stores to individual end users. (??)
  • Increased the importance and the complexity of
    reverse logistics
  • ??,????(B2C)

66
E-Fulfillment Requires a New Logistics
Infrastructure
67
E-business Opportunities1
  • Reduce Facility Costs
  • Eliminate retail/distributor sites
  • Reduce Inventory Costs
  • Apply the risk-pooling concept
  • Centralized stocking
  • Postponement of product differentiation
  • Use Dynamic Pricing Strategies to Improve Supply
    Chain Performance
  • Dynamic pricing ????????????

68
E-business Opportunities2
  • Supply Chain Visibility
  • Reduction in the Bullwhip Effect
  • Reduction in Inventory
  • Improved service level
  • Better utilization of Resources
  • Improve supply chain performance
  • Provide key performance measures
  • Identify and alert when violations occur
  • Allow planning based on global supply chain data

69
????
  • ??????? or ????????
  • ????
  • ????
  • ????
  • ????
  • ????
  • ????
  • ??
  • ??
  • ??????
  • ????????
  • ??

70
Summary
  • Implementation of push-pull strategies and
    demand-driven strategies have helped many
    companies to improve performance, reduce costs,
    increase service levels.
  • Collapse of many Internet companies shows that
    e-business has great challenges.
  • Companies need to
  • Identify the appropriate supply chain strategy
    for individual products.
  • Case for no physical infrastructure or inventory
    is tenuous
  • Pushpull strategy
  • advocates holding inventory
  • although it pushes the inventory upstream in the
    supply chain.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com