Hearing in Distance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Hearing in Distance

Description:

Blindfolded walk to position or declare distance in Euclidean Units. When are people better? ... Sun, lamps. Light reflecting surfaces. Tables, faces, trees ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: mikeg169
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hearing in Distance


1
Hearing in Distance
  • Or Where is that sound?
  • Today Isabelle Peretz
  • Musical Non-musical Brains
  • Nov. 22 _at_ 12 noon Lunch
  • Rm 2068B South Building

2
Improving Accuracy
  • How do listeners judge distance?
  • Metrics of perception
  • Absolute distance objective scale
  • Euclidean
  • Egocentric distance metric in body relations
  • Gibsonian (J.J. Gibson)
  • Finding a source in distance (Russell, 2004)
  • Experiment test distance of a sound source
  • 1 - 15 meters
  • Blindfolded walk to position or declare distance
    in Euclidean Units
  • When are people better?

3
Results of Walk vs. Metric
  • Greater accuracy with walking judgments
  • Much less variability
  • Overestimation of metric close distances
  • Underestimation of metric long distances
  • Why did we find this result?

4
Is It Just Experience?
  • Judge Sound Source
  • Walking
  • Pull board
  • Laying on stomach, walking on hands
  • Metrical declaration
  • Blindfold listening
  • Full vision movement to source position
  • Judge distances 2 30 meters

5
Results with the Crawl Experiment
  • Walk Crawl very accurate
  • Some underestimation at very long distances
  • Much more variation with metric judgment
  • Tendency for overestimation
  • Golfers show improved accuracy judging metric
    distance
  • No underestimation tendency at greater distances
    with body-relevant units

6
The Affordance Paradigm
  • Why are listeners better judging distances using
    body-relevant actions?
  • Use of Affordances
  • Gibsons simple idea
  • World is perceived in action relevant units
  • All perception evolved to support action
  • Best perception when subjects interact with
    environment
  • Affordances
  • Action/body-relevant properties of the world
  • Graspable, Eatable, Sitable, Walkable

7
Hearing the Silent World
  • Localization
  • Study of sound sources
  • Sound producing objects relative to listener
  • Are sound sources the basis of hearing?
  • Visual world
  • Light producing objects
  • Sun, lamps
  • Light reflecting surfaces
  • Tables, faces, trees
  • Can we detect sound obscuring/reflecting surfaces?

8
Hearing the Silent World
  • Sound obstructing surfaces
  • Diffuse sound field set behind sound attenuating
    surfaces
  • Are listeners sensitive to position of surfaces?
  • Test behavioral judgment
  • Is the aperture large enough to allow passage?
  • Ego-centric judgment facilitates accuracy
  • Aperture size affects intensity, spectra
  • Randomize intensities, sine wave signals
  • Listeners can detect position of sound
    obstructing surfaces

9
Elevation
  • Height relative to listener
  • How can this be determined?
  • Interaural cues?
  • Timing difference between the ears
  • Mid-Saggital plane
  • Loudness difference between the ears
  • Absorption by head pinna
  • Front-back confusions
  • Pinna cues
  • Forward, downward facing
  • Partially resolve front-back errors

10
Distance
  • How far away is a sound source?
  • Interaural cues?
  • Azimuth does not indicate relative distance
  • Pinna cues?
  • Slight-downward facing
  • More distant cues higher in the perceptual plane
  • Salient cues for distance
  • Intensity
  • Attenuation over distance
  • Frequency dependent
  • Unreliable indicator
  • Reverberation
  • Increase in number and lag of echoes
  • DEMO
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com