A MultipleMeasures Approach to Mathematics Placement Joanna Pruden jprudenpct'edu Ed Owens eowenspct - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

A MultipleMeasures Approach to Mathematics Placement Joanna Pruden jprudenpct'edu Ed Owens eowenspct

Description:

A committee of math faculty was able to adjust the placement level upward based ... Allow for the use of a calculator ... High school math courses and the level ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: ITS8469
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A MultipleMeasures Approach to Mathematics Placement Joanna Pruden jprudenpct'edu Ed Owens eowenspct


1
A Multiple-Measures Approach to Mathematics
Placement Joanna Pruden (jpruden_at_pct.edu)Ed
Owens (eowens_at_pct.edu) Diana Kuhns
(dkuhns_at_pct.edu)Pennsylvania College of
TechnologyWilliamsport, PA
2
Philosophy of Placement Testing
  • Penn College evaluates students' skills to ensure
    that they have the entry-level skills necessary
    for their majors and college-level coursework.
  • The placement process should determine the
    highest level at which a student has the
    prerequisite knowledge to be successful.

3
Philosophy, continued
  • The goal of the mathematics placement process is
    to identify the appropriate initial placement
    into the mathematics curriculum so that each
    student can succeed in college mathematics.
  • This placement level will determine a students
    initial mathematics course-selection options.

4
Mathematics Course Flow Chart
5
Descriptions of Placement Levels
  • Provides a detailed description of a typical
    student for each placement level
  • Used to inform faculty, students, and parents

6
Past Placement Process
  • Prior to Spring 2008 -
  • Used standardized (paper and pencil) tests
    prepared by ETS
  • Did not permit calculators
  • Assigned placement levels based solely on
    placement test scores

7
Past Placement Process, continued
  • A committee of math faculty was able to adjust
    the placement level upward based on a students
    math background and results of an affective
    survey.
  • The committee was not able to adjust a students
    placement level downward.

8
Goals for New Placement Process
  • Develop new placement tests that more closely
    aligned with our course goals and student
    outcomes
  • Expand the depth of questioning at the elementary
    algebra level
  • Allow for the use of a calculator

9
Goals, continued
  • Implement a new process for assigning placement
    levels that includes examining multiple measures
  • Establish sub-scores that provide critical
    information beyond content topics
  • Basic (Algorithmic)
  • Applications
  • Concepts

10
Components of the New Placement Exam
  • Pre-Algebra/Elementary Algebra
  • pre-algebra and elementary algebra skills and
    concepts
  • 58 questions (20 PA/38 EA)/45-minute test
  • Intermediate Algebra
  • intermediate algebra and geometry skills and
    concepts
  • 25 questions/30-minute test
  • Functions and Graphs
  • algebraic, trigonometric, exponential, and
    logarithmic functions and graphs
  • 37 questions/45-minute test

11
Components Students Take
  • Every student begins the placement process by
    taking two
  • components of the exam.
  • Students with Math SAT scores greater than or
    equal to 550
  • Intermediate Algebra and Function and Graphs
    components
  • SAT scores must not be older than 2 years
  • Students without Math SAT scores or with Math SAT
    scores less than 550 or older than 2 years old
  • Pre-Algebra/Elementary Algebra and Intermediate
    Algebra components
  • For students who do well, the committee may
    recommend that they take the Functions and Graphs
    component online at a later date.

12
Factors Used to Assign Placement Levels
  • Scores on mathematics and reading placement
    exams, including cluster scores
  • High school math courses and the level of success
    in those classes
  • SAT and ACT scores, if available
  • PSSA (Pennsylvania System of School Assessment)
    math scores, if available
  • Amount of time that has passed since the student
    completed his/her last math course
  • Study skills, anxiety, and attitude scores, as
    determined by an affective survey
  • High school rank

13
Affective Survey Components
  • Students complete online survey that provides
  • information about their math anxiety level, their
  • study skills habits, and their attitude about
  • mathematics.
  • Math Anxiety (0 to 10)
  • Study Skills (0 to 16)
  • Attitude (0 to 20)

14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
Significant Changes
  • Less disagreement with students and parents over
    assigned placement levels
  • Improved student advising, especially with
    developmental students
  • More remediation prior to first semester at the
    College
  • More data available for future assessment and
    improvement

21
Significant Changes, continued
  • Improved student support materials available on
    mathematics department website (www.pct.edu/math)
  • Purpose of the placement tests
  • Sample placement tests with self-analysis
  • Sample placement test FAQs

22
Whats Next?
  • Assessment projects to improve the process
  • Examine impact on course success rates
  • Determine which measures are better indicators of
    success in first math course
  • Outreach to local high schools
  • Create sample placement tests
  • Conduct workshops for high school teachers and
    counselors

23
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com