Babies at risk for autism: Why, how, and what (do we know)? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Babies at risk for autism: Why, how, and what (do we know)?

Description:

Babies at risk for autism: Why, how, and what do we know – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: awa9
Learn more at: https://awares.org
Category:
Tags: autism | babies | bsm | files | know | risk | wav

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Babies at risk for autism: Why, how, and what (do we know)?


1
Babies at risk for autism Why, how, and what (do
we know)?
  • Mark Johnson

2
Superior Temporal Sulcus/Gyrus
Left Frontal Operculum
Fusiform Gyrus (blue)
Orbitofrontal Cortex (red)
3
How does the social brain develop?
4
Superior Temporal Sulcus/Gyrus
Left Frontal Operculum
Fusiform Gyrus (blue)
Orbitofrontal Cortex (red)
5
Infants at-risk for autism
6
Why?
  • Research into early onset can get at causal
    factors
  • Symptoms may be compounded during development
  • Possibility of early intervention

7
Cause The triad of impairment
8
Compounding Symptoms
  • In developmental disorders, initial symptoms can
    be compounded by atypical interactions with
    others and the environment
  • Important to start early e.g. over 1,000 hours
    of face-to-face social interaction in the first
    year.

9
Early intervention
  • Medical research moving to prevention rather than
    cure
  • Intervention programmes exist for young children
    already diagnosed
  • Can we devise interventions for babies at highest
    risk, or that show early signs?

10
How?
  • How can study the mind/brain of young babies?
  • What at-risk groups are best for these studies
  • What design of studies should we use?

11
How (can we study the mind of babies)?
12
Behavioral Testing
13
Looking measures in babies
  • Preferential looking
  • Habituation
  • Eye-tracking

14
Eye-tracking in babies
15
EEG/Event-related potentials
16
ERP Results
17
Optical imaging (NIRS)
18
Optical Imaging (NIRS)
19
Infants at-risk
  • Children with known genetic conditions (e.g.
    fragile-X 30 have ASD)
  • Children with other known medical conditions
    (e.g. tuberous sclerosis 24 have ASD).
  • Baby brothers and sisters of older children with
    autism (10).

20
Design of studies
  • Longitudinal design with infant measures and
    assessment at 3 years
  • Involves a 5 year-cycle and hundreds of babies
  • Currently very few studies have reached this stage

21
So far
  • Why? Cause, compounding, intervention
  • How? New methods, study design
  • What? - do we know so far?

22
Canadian study (Zwaigenbaum, Bryson and
colleagues)
  • siblings low-risk controls
  • Assessed at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, with
    diagnostic assessment at 3 years
  • AOSI Autism Observation Scale for Infants

23
AOSI (Bryson et al. In press)
  • Interactive, play-based measure of early signs of
    autism
  • Attention tracking
  • Communication (e.g. social babbling)
  • Social responses (e.g. peek-a-boo)
  • Play (e.g. imitation)
  • Motor control

24
AOSI (examples)
  • Disengagement of visual attention Anticipation
  • Social babbling Imitation

25
Results so far
  • No big differences at 6 months - most show
    typical social behaviours
  • At 12 months differences appear in several
    measures (e.g. visual tracking, decreased eye
    contact, lack of imitation).
  • By 18 months these differences are much clearer,
    but still only a 80-90 match with diagnosis at
    age 3 years

26
VERY preliminary conclusions
  • Indicators are present in most children with ASD
    by 18 months
  • Key features early language, social
    communication, atypical attention and orienting
  • Developmental trajectories vary some show
    regression, others do not
  • A need for more sensitive measures and methods

27
Infant Sibs in UK
  • Collaboration with Tony Charman (ICH), Simon
    Baron-Cohen (Cambridge), Patrick Bolton (IOP) and
    others.
  • Phase 0 (pilot), 31 baby siblings seen at 10
    months. Currently seeing them at 3-4 years old.
  • Phase 1, planned for 100 babies seen at 6, 12, 24
    and 36 months

28
Pilot (Phase 0) study
  • Parent questionnaires about temperament, medical
    history etc
  • Standardised tests (Mullen, Vineland)
  • Physical growth measurements
  • Lab measures of attention and perception

29
Preliminary findings
  • Baby sibs differ as a group from low-risk
    controls in subtle measures of attention and
    social perception
  • One possible reason - this is due to a few
    individuals (who may go on to be diagnosed)
  • Another possibility - sibs do differ as a group,
    but the vast majority recover from risk to
    develop typically

30
National Infant Sibs Network
  • Funded by Autism Speaks (UK) with other charities
    to start in 2008
  • Provides a platform for supporting and
    encouraging infant sibs work
  • Central database with shared measures
  • Meetings, workshops, and training
  • Mark.johnson_at_bbk.ac.uk

31
Centre for Brain Cognitive Development BabySibs
team
Holly Garwood Agnes Volein Leslie Tucker
Gergely Csibra Mayada Elsabbagh
32
  • Thanks to
  • Collaborators Tony Charman, Patrick Bolton, Simon
    Baron-Cohen
  • All the babies and their families
  • - Our funders MRC and Autism Speaks
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com