Les jeunots en physique nucl - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Les jeunots en physique nucl

Description:

Deuteron to SHE nuclei to neutron stars and nuclear (strange) matter ... Some trivial facts. No 'one size fits all' theory for nuclei ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: wito74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Les jeunots en physique nucl


1
Les jeunots en physique nucléaire de basse
énergie Some remarks on current theoretical
activities France vs the rest of the
world Thomas Duguet (SPhN)
2
Theory of Nuclei
  • Goals
  • Comprehensive and unified description of all
    nuclei
  • Low-energy reaction and structure properties
  • From basic interactions between protons and
    neutrons
  • Understand different states of nuclear matter in
    astrophysics environments
  • Difficulties
  • Self-bound, two-component quantum many-fermions
    system
  • Complicated interaction from low-energy regime of
    QCD
  • Tensor and spin-orbit components
  • Unnaturally large scattering lengths (2-body
    virtual and bound states)
  • NNN unavoidable
  • Repulsive core and strong tensor at short
    distances?
  • Properties of finite and bulk nucleonic matter
  • Deuteron to SHE nuclei to neutron stars and
    nuclear (strange) matter
  • Need to extrapolate to unknown regions
  • Some trivial facts
  • No one size fits all theory for nuclei

3
Selection of advances in the recent years
  • Ab-initio (NCSMGFMC) methods allowed for
    interaction tests
  • Consistent proof of the role of NNN interaction
    in light nuclei
  • Nuclear interactions c-EFT provides missing
    links
  • Explains hierarchy NN gt NNN gt NNNN 2N-3N, ?N,
    ??, consistency
  • Chiral symmetry breaking of QCD encoded gt
    constrains ?N interaction
  • Renormalization Group provides gentle NN
    (Vlowk) NNN
  • Use relevant degrees of freedom/energy scales for
    low energy nuclear physics
  • Many-body problem becomes (mostly) perturbative
    (HUGE practical implications)
  • Quantitative microscopic nuclear structure
  • CI calculations into the fp shell sSD608 140
    keV!
  • LACM shape coexistence and fission
  • Transfermiums as a window on SHE nuclei
  • First EDF mass tables (SR) and systematics of
    correlations (MR) in heavy nuclei
  • Multipole strength S(El)/b-decay from fully
    self-consistent (deformed!) QRPA
  • Shell evolution towards drip-lines role of
    tensor force raised
  • Integration of structure and reaction for light
    nuclei
  • Multistep reactions calculations using coupled
    discretized continuum channels
  • GSM, CSM and SMEC to incorporate (many-body)
    continuum in CI
  • Use of nuclear inputs into reaction models e.g.
    JLM optical model

4
Selection of challenges for the coming years
  • Bridge between hadrons and nuclei
  • e.g., lattice QCD with smaller pion masses match
    ?PT with lattice results
  • NNN interaction
  • Test NNN (NNNN) from c-EFT at N3LO through NCSM
    calculations of light nuclei
  • Role in medium mass nuclei through CC and
    spectroscopy through CI and EDF
  • Interplay of phenomenological and non-empirical
    EDF
  • Constructed from low-momentum interactions/c-EFT
    and benchmarked against CC
  • Predictability (theoretical error bars) and
    accuracy (new (re)fitting protocols)
  • Strong focus on spectroscopy
  • Coherent formulation of SR and MR EDF methods
    from first principle
  • Superfluidity
  • Nature of pairing correlations in finite nuclei
  • Pairing in asymmetric systems e.g.
    neutron-proton pairing, polarized cold atoms
  • Shell position/evolution in stable/neutron rich
    nuclei
  • Role of tensor, NNN, spin-orbit (matter
    diffusivity), other?
  • LACM coexistence, fusion and fission
  • Quantitative methods including both diabatic and
    adiabatic effects
  • Integration of structure and reaction
  • Advance GSM/CCSD (interaction) and apply to
    complex open light nuclei

5
Some useful experimental data (not exhaustive!!)
  • Fission
  • Barriers and life-time
  • Mass and kinetic energy distributions of
    fragments
  • Evaporated neutrons and gs
  • Systematic data into the next major shell (few
    mass units)
  • Mass differences e.g. shell evolution and
    pairing
  • First 2, B(E2) and Qs e.g. deformation and
    shell evolution
  • Single-particle energies and spectroscopic
    factors i.e. shell evolution
  • Pair transfer e.g. quantitative information on
    pairing?
  • Data at large deformations (low and high J)
  • Beta-decay and charge-exchange reactions e.g.
    pin down theories for weak rates
  • Transfermiums
  • Rotational bands i.e. pairing and shell
    positioning
  • K-isomers i.e. pairing and shell positioning
  • Neutron radii
  • Parity violation from e- scattering (208Pb) at
    JLAB i.e. Rn-Rp ltgt asym(rsat)/P(rsat/2)
  • Same in more (neutron-rich) nuclei might be of
    interest
  • Neutron star observations
  • Thermal X-ray emission for cooling

6
Young  french  theorists activities by
methods/subjects
STRUCTURE Heavy / Light REACTION Heavy / Light ASTRO NS / n Symmetry Model stand. TOTAL
(TD)EDF 11,75 / - 2 / - 1,5 / - 0,25 15,5
CI 0,5 / 2 - / - - / 1 - 3,5
GSM - / 0,5 - / 0,5 - / - - 1
Opt. Pot. - / - 1 / - - / - - 1
CChannel - / - - / 1 - / - - 1
GFMC - / - - / - - / - - -
NCSM - / - - / - - / - - -
CCluster - / - - / - - / - - -
SCGF - / - - / - - / - - -
NN/NNN - / - - / - - / - - -
TOTAL 12,25 / 3 3 / 1,5 1,5 / 0,5 0,25 22
7
Are we well positioned for the next 10/15 years?
  • Community extremely biased towards EDF methods
  • Chance to propose a coherent effort
  • Promising future as experimental facilities move
    to medium-mass exotic nuclei
  • Cultural advantage but US and Japan now put
    strong emphasis on EDF e.g. UNEDF
  • Our expertise suggest to
  • Push MREDF methods e.g. QRPA,
    GCM/Projection-like methods
  • Develop further and systematize the use of
    Time-Dependent EDF methods
  • Push cross-fertilization between EDF and CI
    e.g. ESNT workshop on April 7-10
  • Such a bias carries the danger to miss the big
    picture
  • E.g., somewhat true about ab-initio methods and
    nuclear interactions in the 80/90s
  • Could be detrimental as overlap/benchmarks are
    envisioned e.g. with CC
  • Might need to recruit a few theorists with
    different expertise
  • Interplay between structure and reaction e.g.
    GSM
  • Hard core reaction theory e.g. issue with
    extracting spectroscopic factors
  • Promising ab-initio method for medium mass
    nuclei Coupled Cluster

8
Geography
  • Strong on-going theoretical collaborations
  • GANIL-IPNO
  • CENBG-GANIL-IPNL-SPhN
  • GANIL-SPhN
  • Future
  • Projects will naturally follow historical
    collaborations
  • But new ones will hopefully arise
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com