The Road to Legitimacy: A Study of Startups and Their Established Competitors in the Australian Wine - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The Road to Legitimacy: A Study of Startups and Their Established Competitors in the Australian Wine

Description:

... social capital, and managerial social cognition) (Barney, 1991; Penrose, 1959) ... from one winery to another, if that second winery was a 'dog's breakfast' and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: dibr
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Road to Legitimacy: A Study of Startups and Their Established Competitors in the Australian Wine


1
The Road to Legitimacy A Study of Startups and
Their Established Competitors in the Australian
Wine Industry
  • Clay Dibrell, Oregon State University
  • Aaron Johnson, Oregon State University
  • Peter Davis, The University of Memphis
  • Ken Moores, Bond University
  • Justin Craig, Bond University

2
Motivation
  • High rate of failure by new firms.
  • Liability of Newness (Suchman, 1995).
  • Possible role of legitimacy gaining strategies.
  • Changing stakeholder salience over time.

3
Research Question
  • What roles do external stakeholders (e.g.,
    government) and internal stakeholders (e.g.,
    human capital) play in enabling or constraining
    startups to attain and to maintain legitimacy?
  • To what extend does the salience of each
    stakeholder change prior to a startup gaining
    legitimacy and after a startup attains
    legitimacy?

4
Theory
  • Institutional Theory
  • Legitimacy as a generalized perception or
    assumption that the actions of an entity are
    desirable, proper, or appropriate within some
    socially constructed system of norms, values,
    beliefs, and definitions (Suchman, 1995).
  • Legitimacy enables the firm to conduct business
    more efficiently and effectively (Zimmerman
    Zetiz, 2002).

5
Theory
  • Resource-Based View
  • Intangible assets (e.g., managerial human
    capital, managerial social capital, and
    managerial social cognition) (Barney, 1991
    Penrose, 1959).
  • Intangible capabilities of coordination and
    adaptive practices can link to a firm competitive
    advantage (Dibrell Craig, 2006).

6
Theory
  • Stakeholder Salience
  • Stakeholders are broadly defined as any
    constituency that has a stake in the company,
    including a broad range of stakeholders from
    groups, communities, organizations, or
    institutions (Mitchell, Agle, Wood 1997).
  • Stakeholder salience is the the degree to which
    managers give priority to competing stakeholder
    claims ( Mitchell et al., 1997 854)

7
Theory
  • Complementary Theoretical Perspectives
  • Stakeholder salience, institutional theory, and
    resource-based view (Jones, Felps, Bigley,
    2007).
  • The internal strategies to cope and to adapt to
    the changing salience of external and internal
    stakeholders are a capability that greatly
    enhances the startup ventures propensity to
    attain venture legitimacy.

8
Methods
  • Qualitative research
  • Sample
  • 12 interviews with Owners or Managing Partners of
    Australian Wineries
  • Six different Australian States
  • New South Wales (Hunter Valley)
  • Queensland (Mount Tabmorine)
  • South Australia (Barossa Valley Adelaide Hills)
  • Tasmania (Tamar Valley Coal River Valley)
  • Victoria (Dookie Region)
  • Western Australia (Margaret River)
  • 9 Startup Wineries
  • 3 Established Wineries

9
Methods
  • Data Collection
  • A single semi-structured interview which lasted
    approximately for one hour with a single owner or
    multiple owners which were later transcribed.
  • Ranking of Stakeholders
  • Pre-legitimacy attainment
  • Post-legitimacy attainment
  • A validation questionnaire capturing
    demographics.

10
Comments from Interviewees
  • Keys to Success from a Startup Perspective
  • You know, wineries reputations sort of ebb and
    flow. That if you know that Fred Smith has
    moved from one winery to another, if that second
    winery was a dogs breakfast and terrible,
    youre perception of it will immediately change
    because he is there and you know that he is going
    to make it right. Okay? And when a good
    winemaker leaves a place and a poor one comes in,
    it is never very long before that starts to show
    through. Okay. So the reputation that John
    brought with him has been incredibly helpful.

11
Comments from Interviewees
  • Keys to Success from an Established Perspective
  • Well as I said a few minutes ago, being a sort
    of a bit of a hard headed sort of person, youve
    got to have your finance right. Youve got to
    have your cost of production right. Youve got
    to have your margin right. Youve got to have
    the right distributors. And as I said earlier
    too, having brand recognition is critically
    important. Otherwise youre starting from square
    one and in this environment as I say, I wouldnt
    try and do it. Just too bloody hard.

12
Stakeholder Rankings Pre-Legitimacy
  • Family
  • Location
  • Winemaker
  • Cellar Room Sales
  • Staff
  • Financial Supporters
  • Awards for Wine Quality from Media and
    Professional Outlets

13
Stakeholder Rankings Pre-Legitimacy
  • Wine Distribution through Restaurants
  • Wine Distributors
  • Suppliers (Growers, Wine Bottles)
  • Government
  • Neighboring Winemakers
  • Trade Shows
  • Retail Outlets
  • Professional Trade Associations

14
Findings
  • Differences of Stakeholder Salience between
    Startup and Established Wineries
  • Differences on stakeholder perceptions for period
    prior to startup legitimacy.
  • Established wineries ranked financial supporters
    higher than startup wineries (Z -2.23 p lt
    .05).
  • Established wineries placed a greater emphasis on
    wine distributors compared to startup wineries (Z
    -1.67 p lt .10).

15
Findings
  • Differences between of Salience between Startup
    and Established Wineries
  • Differences on stakeholder perceptions for period
    post startup legitimacy.
  • Established wineries ranked financial supporters
    higher than startup wineries (Z -1.96 p lt
    .05).
  • Established wineries placed a greater emphasis on
    location compared to startup wineries (Z -1.67
    p lt .10).

16
Propositions
  • Proposition 1 Startup ventures, in the process
    of attaining legitimacy, place lesser salience on
    financial supporters than established ventures.
  • Proposition 2 Startup ventures, in the process
    of attaining legitimacy, place lesser salience on
    wine distributors than established ventures.

17
Propositions
  • Proposition 3 Startup ventures, which have
    attained legitimacy, place a greater salience on
    location than established ventures.
  • Proposition 4 Startup ventures, which have
    attained legitimacy, place a lesser salience on
    financial supporters than established ventures.

18
Implications
  • A paradox of which resources come first for a
    startup (e.g., winemaker or financial resources).
  • Startups rely to a greater extent on internal
    more so than external sources.
  • Both are used to gain legitimacy.
  • Salience of stakeholders by startups in attaining
    and maintaining legitimacy remains relatively
    stable over time.

19
Future Research
  • Family embeddedness and resource mobilization
    (Aldrich Cliff, 2003).
  • Examination of the strategies associated with
    attaining legitimacy (Zimmerman Zeitz, 2002).
  • Operationalize a legitimacy scale.
  • Conduct a broader survey of stakeholder salience
    and legitimacy gaining strategies.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com