The Threat, Policy and Mission - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

The Threat, Policy and Mission

Description:

International Terrorism contains all the above elements with a bias towards ... Innocent Civilians are the off times the major victims! ... Madeleine Albright (1999) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: wayn57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Threat, Policy and Mission


1
The Threat, Policy and Mission
  • Wayne Solomon
  • June 2009

2
International Conflict,Terrorist State and
International Terrorism
  • Geopolitical Issues (tensions) Political
    (territorial), Economic, Religious (ethnic) and
    Military (Conventional, WMD, terrorist State, and
    international terrorist).
  • International Terrorism contains all the above
    elements with a bias towards ethnic and religious
    differences
  • Ethnic and religious divides are easy to define
    but nearly impossible to separate
  • Innocent Civilians are the off times the major
    victims!
  • Terrorism is an Asymmetric force multiplier by
    gaining the attention (sympathy, fear, etc.) of
    the populace
  • Countering that is resistance to lack of security
    and populace realization that they are targets.

3
Terrorist States( State Dept. Report, 2002-2003)
4
Terrorist States (State Dept. of 2002), contd
  • Lybia, Qadhafi attempts to shed past pariah
    status (bombs on A/C) and takes a stand against
    al-Qaida. (Recently gave up his nuclear program
    and is in normalization talks)
  • N.Korea continues to sell ballistic missile
    technology to other states (Continues)
  • Sudan, civil war is a problem but government is
    curbing terrorism for export. (Political
    instability)
  • Syria has permitted various anti-Israeli groups
    to operate, and funnel support to Palestine, but
    Govt has not supported terrorism elsewhere in
    the world. (Today, kind a mixed bag of support)

5
Madeleine Albright (1999)
  • Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Sudan
    (Afganastan?) and Syria defined as Terrorists
    states since 1993. A policy issue
  • In 1998 state sponsors are committing less, not
    more terrorism
  • Osama Bin Laden was responsible for 6000 injuries
    and deaths in 1998, alone and is really his own
    separate state
  • She noted that state sponsored terrorism is being
    replaced with numerous international groups that
    cover several states
  • Since then most countries have been damaged by
    international terrorism but not necessarily state
    sponsored

6
United States Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
  • Judgements against state sponsored terrorism part
    of international law (100s of millions)
  • Alejandre, 1996 Cuba shot down U.S. Civilian A/C
  • Flatow, 1995 Iranian funded bombing in Isreal
    killed U.S. college student
  • Cicippio, three U.S. citizens kidnapped in
    Beruit, 1985
  • Anderson, 1995 was kidnapped in Beruit
  • Eisenfeld, 1996 two U.S. citizens killed by bomb
    in Isreal
  • Higgens, U.S. marine colonel kidnapped while
    serving U.N. in Lebonon, 1987
  • Hezbollah was involved in several of the above
    and judgements were obtained in these cases.

7
States, Weapons of Mass Destruction
8
States, Weapons of Mass Destruction, contd
9
Update of State Sponsored Terrorism (2003)
  • State Department has continuous updates
  • Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, N. Korea, Sudan
    and Syria are changing as pressure is applied
  • Some of these states have been essentially
    removed from the list
  • Heavy political and economic pressure from U.S.
    and others has reduced the direct involvement by
    governments to sanctuary (mainly)
  • Last few years cooperation between nations has
    continued to pressure terrorist states

10
Counterproliferation Policy(CPI)
  • U.S. and NATO began to develop a policy to
    counter rapid spread of WMD in 90s as the cold
    war ended
  • Developing new capabilities to deal with
    proliferation (Stealth, Anti-missile, High Energy
    Laser, etc.)
  • Developing several regional alliances with
    similar goals
  • Need to be consistent with political goals of
    States, France, Germany, Russia, China, etc.( U.S
    has had the lead in weapons, so is suspect with
    regard to partnerships even before Iraq war)
  • After Bosnia, with Nuclear arms in the hands of
    weaker countries Pakistan, India, and others,
    transfer of nuclear WMD is of great concern (i.e.
    N. Korea, Iran, others)
  • In the 90s there was much discussion about a
    broad global policy including pre-emptive strikes
    within NATO and no general agreement, even though
    European States are within range of Mid-East
    weapons. Still planning went on, no apparent
    action.
  • U.S. undertook a serious Ballistic Missile
    Defense (BMD) effort in spite of much skepticism
    among major alliance partners
  • Dept. of State and Defense have different views
    and roles in CPI and lessons of recent limited
    wars need to be addressed (Intelligence?).
    Leadership taken by National R and D community
    around technology capabilities.

11
Counterproliferation Capibility Enhancements
began in 90s
  • Detection, identification, and characterization
    of biological and chemical warfare agents ,ltlt
  • Cruise missile defense lt
  • Theater ballistic missile defense lt
  • Detection, characterization, and defeat of
    underground WMD facilities lt
  • Collection, analysis, and dissemination of
    actionable intelligence to the warfighter ltlt
  • Robust passive defense to enable continued
    operations on the NBC battlefield ltlt
  • Biological warfare vaccine research, development,
    testing, and production ltlt
  • Target planning for WMD targets ltlt
  • Biological/chemical agent defeat ltlt
  • Detection and tracking of WMD and WMD-related
    shipments ltltlt
  • Support for Special Operations Forces ltlt
  • Prompt mobile target detection and defeat ltlt
  • Defense against paramilitary, covert delivery,
    and terrorist WMD threats ltlt
  • Support export control activities of the US
    government lt
  • Support inspection and monitoring activities of
    verifiable arms control agreements and regimes
    ltltlt
  • ENHANCEMENTS Little done, lt modest effort ltlt
    high level, ltltlt Excel

12
Update (Center for International Strategic
Studies, 2009)
  • Changing Multi-polar world with state and
    non-state actors
  • Russia, India and China
  • Radical Islam
  • US Leadership military, climate change, global
    health, etc.
  • Power of Petro States has been used as leverage
    against Terrorist states

13
Additions since 2008
  • The new policy as outlined by Obama will be a mix
    of hard and soft power,
  • It will no more be a war on terror as projected
    by the previous administration. Instead, it will
    be a campaign against terrorism.
  • While continued military operations are
    necessary, military operations alone cannot
    eradicate terrorism.

14
Terrorism Security Threats beyond WMD
  • Many sectors of Critical Domestic( homeland)
    Structure
  • Foreign and Domestic Ports
  • Borders
  • Cyber Attacks
  • Natural Disasters
  • Air Traffic
  • Terrorist Networks
  • Many more.

15
Mitigate WMD Proliferation Threats
  • Nuclear, Radiological, Bio, Chemical
  • New Nuclear and Potential Nuclear States
  • Non-State Actors may acquire
  • Efficacy of International Control..

16
Struggle Against Radical Terrorists
  • Al Qaeda, Numerous Radical Organizations in
    Middle East, Far East and Africa
  • A somewhat atypical Asymmetric Threat

17
Promote Human Rights and Security
  • Energy Security
  • Environmental Security
  • Economic Security

18
U.S. Systems
  • Examples from U.S. inventory of WMD Related
    systems

19
Naval Weapons
  • Trident, C-4 and D-5 Ballistic Missile group
  • Part of the Strategic Triad Nuclear Deterrent
  • Tomahawk, SLCMs
  • Can be both Tactical and strategic in character

20
Naval Weapons, contd
Launch platforms for Intermediate range missiles
USS Ohio (SSBN-726) (First of class)
21
Nuclear Powered Carrier Force
  • Projection of Force
  • Self-contained naval units, can operate anywhere
    U.S. presence is needed

22
ABM Development
  • Began with nuclear tipped Nike X (Spartan) and
    shorter range Sprint Missile Development in 70s
  • Radiation XRay enhanced part.
  • EMP against missile electronics
  • Part of Safeguard Program was canceled after test

23
More Recent History
  • Moscow ABM System was early successful version in
    60s and 70s
  • Development of Gorgon(long Rng) and Gazelle
  • Development of US Safeguard System was abandoned
    because
  • of cost arguments
  • Overwhelmed by MIRVE
  • BMD Systems

24
Operational BMD Systems
  • Effective against tactical systems, THAD And
    Standard Arm Aegis missile Cruiser
  • Limited use against BM

25
Aegis System
  • Numerous successful tests against a variety of
    missiles and satellites

26
Strategic Missiles
  • Minuteman III, One arm of nuclear triad

27
Peacekeeper (MX)
Next generation after Minuteman, Operates from
CONUS
28
Strategic Bomber
  • B 52, Big deterrent and multi-purpose delivery
    system being removed from serv.

29
Stealth Technology
  • B-2, Modern Delivery System with long range
    capability. Limited numbers

30
Supersonic Bomber
  • B-1, Quick Response, deep penetration, costly to
    maintain

31
Predator UAV
  • Used in Mid-East piloted from U.S. bases
  • Space SATCOM assets for control and operation.

32
Intelligence Agencies
  • Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) provides
    military intelligence to policymakers and force
    planners.
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Provides
    overall intelligence assessments to policy
    makers.
  • National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA)
    provides geospatial intelligence.
  • National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) analyzes
    military and CIA aircraft and satellite
    reconnaissance information.
  • National Security Agency (NSA) collects foreign
    signals intelligence and protects information
    systems from compromise.
  • Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps
    intelligence agencies collect intelligence
    relevant to the needs of their services

33
Spy Planes
  • SR-71, Photo Intel (retired)
  • U-2, Photo Intel

34
Unmanned Recognizance (UAV)
  • Global Hawk, High Altitude surveillance
  • Predator, Battlefield surveillance and
    interdiction

35
Latest Spy Plane?
  • Aurora? (hoax!)

36
Spy Satellites
  • Keyhole, KH-11, elliptical polar orbit, visible,
    I.R. digital Imaging twice a day over target.
  • Early versions dropped film to surface.
  • KH-11 and later types, 4-6 ft digital imaging
  • Download Real-time Data through Milstar
    communication satellite constellation

37
Radar Imaging
  • Lacrosse, 400 Mi. orbit target twice a day with
    Synthetic Aperture Radar can target beneath the
    clouds.
  • Images resolved 2-4 ft.

38
Missile Warning
  • DSP, Defense Support Program, 22000 mi.
    Geosynchronous Orbit, Thermal Imaging to detect
    Rocket Launch

39
Global Positioning (GPS)
  • Low earth orbit, Precise Navigation for Military
  • Precision weapons Delivery
  • (Air Force, Naval Systems)
  • Battlefield positioning (Army)

40
Communications Satellite
  • DCSS, Milstar used for world-wide communications
    from 22000 Mile Synchronous Orbits
  • Large Solar Arrays to generate lots of Power

41
Weather
  • Defense Meteorological Satellite, DMSP in Polar
    Orbit at 500 Mi.
  • Continuous weather coverage for Military

42
Russian Systems
  • Very Powerful Force

43
Russian Missile fleet
44
(No Transcript)
45
Russian Strategic Submarine Fleet
46
Russian Naval IRBMs
47
Russian Bomber and Fighters
  • Russian Military aircraft inventory similar but
    less capable than those of the U.S.

48
Russian ABM System
  • Systems
  • Leningrad ABM-1 / A-35 ABM-2 / S-225 ABM-3 /
    A-135
  • Interceptor
  • SH-?? Griffon V-1000 SH-04 Galosh A-350 SH-08
    Gazelle 53T6 SH-11 Gorgon 51T6 SH-?? S-225
    S-300P SA-10 GRUMBLES-300V SA-12
    GLADIATORS-300V SA-12 GIANTS-400 SA-20
    TriumfS-500
  • Radars
  • Very Advance Radar Types (operational??)

49
Russian Space Assets
  • Similar to those deployed by the U.S

50
A Rogue State, N. Korea
  • An emerging nuclear nation

51
North Korean Ballistic Missiles
52
North Korea as a Nuclear State
  • We recently noted that the North is constructing
    a plant that could produce enough weapons-grade
    uranium for two or more nuclear weapons per year
    when fully operational -- which has occured
  • The US has been concerned about North Korea's
    desire for nuclear weapons and has assessed since
    the early 1990s that the North has one or
    possibly two weapons plutonium it produced.
  • Two tests (2008-09)

53
National Strategy to Combat WMD (2002)
  • Comprehensive strategy to counter all WMDs,
    Nuclear, Chemical, Bio in possession of Hostile
    States
  • Part of Three pronged strategy (Homeland Def.,
    War on Terrorism, WMD)
  • Worlds most destructive weapons in hands of most
    dangerous regimes and terrorists.
  • Threat to our Forces, U.S. mainland and Friends

54
National Strategy to Combat WMD (2002) contd
  • Counter-proliferation by military and civilian
    agencies
  • Intelligence, Interdiction, Deterrence,
    Mitigation (offense and defense)
  • Nonproliferation Diplomacy, by enhanced new
    international agreements
  • Aid in weapons reduction in Russia and former
    Soviet states (Plutonium and enriched Uranium,
    Chem., etc.)
  • Response to disrupt an attack (Iraq ??)
  • Military response and Consequence Management
  • Improved Intelligence and R and D
  • Better understanding of threat and secondary
    cooperation among proliferating states

55
A Case for U.S as a Terrorist State(Noam
Chompsky)
  • Assumption Terrorism is the use of violence to
    obtain political ends through intimidation, fear,
    etc.
  • Case that U.S. will remain in Afghanistan until
    they deliver the terrorists makes U.S. a
    terrorist state.
  • To the extent that we impose our will in
    Anti-terrorism against likes of Bin Laden
    (terrorist) we are practicing terrorism. (Who
    did 9/11?)
  • U.S. arms support to Turkey which put down a
    Kurdish revolt in the mid-nineties.
  • U.S. is considered a terrorist for supporting
    Turkey, which disenfranchised the Kurds (U.S.
    kept Iraq and Turkey from totally exterminating
    the Kurds??)
  • War on Terrorism is only an excuse to get control
    of mid-east oil and a further excuse for
    repression at home( Assumes that U.S. and allies
    are basically repressive states)

56
A case for Israel as a Terrorist State
  • Terrorism is primarily a war on the civilian
    populace
  • Israel could be considered a terrorist state
    because it targets quasi-military terrorists and
    civilian suicide bombers
  • U.S. position Israel has the right to defend
    itself.

57
Fuel/Air Explosive
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com