The CGEN Project: Development, Implementation and Testing of Genetics Education Materials for Use in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

The CGEN Project: Development, Implementation and Testing of Genetics Education Materials for Use in

Description:

5 Chinese/English brochures. 2 Korean/English brochures ... Translation. Necessary expertise. Staff turnover. Crosswalk to organization's strategic plan ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: dgr43
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The CGEN Project: Development, Implementation and Testing of Genetics Education Materials for Use in


1
The CGEN Project Development, Implementation and
Testing of Genetics Education Materials for Use
in Community and Clinical Settings
  • National Coalition for Health Professional
  • Education In Genetics
  • Bethesda, MD
  • September 23-24, 2009

2
What is the Community Genetics Education Network
(CGEN) Project?
  • Collaborative agreement between March of Dimes
    and Health Resources and Services Administration
    (HRSA)
  • Identify most effective ways to increase genetic
    literacy among diverse minority populations and
    determine best practices
  • Uses principles of community-based participatory
    research
  • Evaluation component for process, implementation,
    and outcomes
  • Four community partners developing and
    implementing population-specific genetics
    education programs

3
What is the goal of CGEN?
  • Goal To increase genetic literacy in underserved
    populations by
  • Facilitating the use of family health history to
    identify genetic risks
  • Enhancing health care decision-making
  • Encouraging consultation with health care
    providers
  • Empowering individuals to address modifiable risk
    factors
  • Increasing utilization of genetic services

4
Who are the partners ?
  • Community Site/Local Evaluator
  • Charles B. Wang Community Health Center/Charles
    B. Wang Community Health Center
  • Dominican Womens Development Center/Jesus
    Sanchez
  • Howard University, Department of Community and
    Family Medicine/Green Consulting
  • Genetic Science Learning Center at the University
    of Utah, in partnership with Utah Department of
    Healths Chronic Disease Genomics Program/Bach
    Harrison LLC
  • National Evaluator Midwest Latino Health
    Research, Training and Policy Center at the
    University of Illinois at Chicago

5
How were the community partners selected?
  • Requirements
  • Conducted local needs assessment
  • Understanding of what and how community would
    like to learn
  • Connections to and within community and ability
    to organize a Community Advisory Board

6
What are the community partners doing?
  • Charles B. Wang Community Health Center
  • 5 Chinese/English brochures
  • 2 Korean/English brochures
  • Workshop curricula to train health educators
  • Genetics education workshops for high risk
    prenatal patients prior to meeting with Genetic
    Counselor
  • Dominican Womens Development Center
  • Training curriculum for Community Health Workers
    (CHW)/Promotoras
  • Community-Based Genetics Education Workshops
  • Bilingual English and Spanish

7
Community partners (continued)
  • Howard University
  • Community workshops
  • 2 interactive booklets
  • Trigger video on family health history
  • Website and toll free number
  • Genetic Science Learning Center with Utah Dept.
    Of Health
  • 5th grade curriculum materials and take home
    activities
  • Secondary school materials and take home
    activities
  • Bilingual English and Spanish
  • Community workshops for Pacific Islanders
    (Tongans)

8
How do we know if weve achieved our goals?
  • Process and Implementation Evaluation
  • Planning and development, and implementation
    phases
  • Document extent to which community participation
    and input is maximized
  • Verify if the program is implemented as planned
  • Ensure program is reaching target audience
  • Outcomes Evaluation
  • Extent to which program participants experience
    the benefits or changes intended
  • Outcomes may relate to behavior, skills,
    knowledge, attitudes, values, or other attributes

9
What have we learned so far about community
participatory approaches?
  • Five factors appear to have significantly
    impacted the degree to which each site engaged
    community members in planning and development
    processes
  • each sites definition of community
  • each sites history of engaging community members
    in program planning and development, and
    implementation
  • each sites expertise in community outreach
  • the goals or purpose of a particular project
  • dimensions of culture that facilitated or
    constrained community involvement
  • Dimensions of culture that facilitated or
    constrained community involvement included the
    cultural values, beliefs and practices of the
    primary community as well as those of the
    sponsoring organization.

Source The Midwest Latino Health Research,
Training Policy Center, University of Illinois
at Chicago, Process Evaluation Planning and
Development Phase Consumer Genetics Education
Network (CGEN) Project Successes and Challenges,
Draft 1/1808
10
What were some of the overall challenges?
  • Variation in experience with partnerships and
    levels of expertise
  • Participatory process requires long period of
    time
  • Variation in settings impacted approaches to
  • Decision-making
  • Staffing and staff turnover
  • Use of consultants
  • Capacities of internal infrastructure to respond
    and adapt to project demands

10
11
What were some of the specific site challenges?
  • Scope of deliverables
  • Resources constraints
  • Translation
  • Necessary expertise
  • Staff turnover
  • Crosswalk to organizations strategic plan

11
12
What are some elements that contributed to
success?
  • Participatory Approach
  • Community Participation
  • Project Oversight/Support
  • Communication systems
  • Training
  • Technical assistance

12
13
What are some lessons learned?
  • No one way of conducting CBPR
  • Genetics education requires partnerships with
    diverse groups at local and national level
  • Requires long term commitment from funding
    sources and partners
  • Community engagement is continuous and evolving
    relationship with a bi-directional information
    exchange
  • Grassroots approach is a method to empower and
    build capacity in communities
  • High level of communication, trust and
    collaboration is essential to effectively engage
    community gatekeepers and stakeholders
  • Community ownership ensures that information
    gathered reflects their needs

14
What are our results so far?
  • Preliminary results
  • Community engagement has occurred
  • Broad based dissemination through a variety of
    formats has occurred
  • Increased basic knowledge of genetics
  • Understanding the importance of knowing and
    documenting family health history
  • Intent to
  • Create a family health history
  • Discuss family health history with health
    provider
  • Adopt healthier behaviors

15
For more information
  • Diane Gross
  • 914-997-4612
  • dgross_at_marchofdimes.com
  • www.marchofdimes.com/genetics

16
Acknowledgements
  • This project is supported by grant U33MC00157
    from the Health Resources and Services
    Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau,
    Genetic Services Branch. Partners in the
    Consumer Genetics Education Network (CGEN) include
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com