Structural determinants and consequences of recent demographic phenomena in Poland - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Structural determinants and consequences of recent demographic phenomena in Poland

Description:

Ireland. 2. 15. 120. 200. Italy. 39. 59. 85. 87. Netherlands. 10. 23. 55. 98. Spain. 14. 26. 44 ... Out of persons aged 25-29 living in: the cities 100 thous. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Agn116
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Structural determinants and consequences of recent demographic phenomena in Poland


1
Structural determinants and consequences of
recent demographic phenomena in Poland
  • Agnieszka Fihel
  • Department of Economic Sciences,
  • Centre of Migration Research
  • University of Warsaw

2
1. Problems
3
Decrease in number of births, 1946-2007
Source Central Statistical Office of Poland
4
Decrease in Total Fertility Rate, Poland
1970-2006
Source Central Statistical Office of Poland
5
Decrease in marriage rates, 1960-2007
Number of marriages in Poland per 1,000
inhabitants
Source Eurostat
6
Why first marriages are so important in Poland?
Age fertility rates by marital status, 2004
Source Central Statistical Office of Poland
7
Numerous outflow from Poland, number of
emigrants in thous.
Source Central Statistical Office of Poland,
2008.
8
Population loss due to the outflow
  • In post-accession period
  • 2.8 of the resident population left
  • 3.3 at age 15
  • 4.0 at age 15-59
  • 8.8 at age 20-24
  • 9.3 at age 25-29

9
Population loss due to the outflow
  • Out of persons aged 25-29 living in
  • the cities 100 thous. inhabitants in
    Warminsko-Mazurskie (North-East) ? 24.4 left
  • the cities 100 thous. inhabitants in Podlaskie
    (East) ? 21.5 left
  • the villages in Swietokrzyskie region (Central) ?
    20 left
  • Out of persons aged 20-24 living in
  • the villages in Podkarpackie region (South-East)
    ? 21.1 left

10
2. Structural determinants of low fertility
11
1. Baby boom and its echo
For women aged 30-34
Source Fihel, Okólski (2008), Bilans
demograficzny Polski w roku 2003, Warszawa
Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego
12
1. Baby boom and its echo
For women aged 20-24
Source Fihel, Okólski (2008), Bilans
demograficzny Polski w roku 2003, Warszawa
Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego
13
2. Delayed first births
Mean age of a woman at first birth, 1988-2005
Source Eurostat
14
2. Delayed first births
Fertility rates by age (per 1,000 women), 1990
and 2006
Source Central Statistical Office of Poland,
2008.
15
2. Delayed first marriages
Median age of a woman at first marriage, 1988-2006
Source Central Statistical Office of Poland,
2008.
16
3. Consequences and responses
17
ConsequencesReal and forecasted number of women
at age 30-34 (red line, left scale) 1975-2030,
real number of births 1975-2006 (blue line,
right scale) from women at age 30-34
Source Fihel, Okólski (2008), Bilans
demograficzny Polski w roku 2003, Warszawa
Ministerstwo Rozwoju Regionalnego
18
Responses
  • The recent decrease in fertility resulted from 1.
    decrease in number of potential mothers 2.
    change of preferences concerning the model of a
    family (delay of setting up a family)
  • This negative tendency was amplified by economic
    transition (decrease in income levels,
    uncertainty at the labour market, need for
    education and competition ? difficulties in
    reconciliation of work and family)
  • From states point of view, demographic cycles
    are detrimental to numerous organization and
    regulating duties (in education system, labour
    market, welfare and health services). Regardless
    of its aims, family policy should alleviate
    fluctuations in the population phenomena.
  • A state cannot stimulate fertility in a direct
    way. However, a state can improve general
    conditions favourable for decisions about
    children by supporting employment of parents,
    especially employment of young mothers,
    developing child care services and, in general,
    creating family-friendly institutions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com