Trials Registration An Ethical Perspective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Trials Registration An Ethical Perspective

Description:

1. Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, ... Dalhousie. Sabina Watts. McMaster. Lisa Golec. Toronto. Elisabeth Clark. McGill. Thankyou ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:19
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: mgood5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trials Registration An Ethical Perspective


1
Trials RegistrationAn Ethical Perspective
Cochrane Symposium Montreal Dec 2, 2005
  • Michael Goodyear1, Lisa Golec2
  • 1. Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II
    Health Sciences Centre,
  • Dalhousie University, Halifax
  • 2. Sunnybrook and Womens College Health Sciences
    Centre,
  • University of Toronto,Toronto

2
Trial Registration Objectives
  • Ethical Principles and Knowledge
  • Registration as Ethical Imperative
  • Role of Ethical Review
  • Relationship between Ethical Review and
    Registration
  • Nurturing a collaborative culture
  • From Silos to Nets

3
Trial Registration
  • Collective Duty of Care (Prior and Post)
  • Prior Inception
  • Decisions based on totality of prior information
  • Post Execution
  • Information acquired will be disclosed for the
    Highest Derived Good (1)

(1) Kant, Critique of Practical Reason, 1778
4
Trial Registration
  • Prior Knowledge
  • Subjects are entitled to believe that decisions
    and information provided are based on all
    knowledge
  • But Prior Knowledge is Incomplete and Selective
  • Research may be unnecessarily Duplicative (2) -

(2) Young C, Horton R. Lancet 3666 107, 2005
5
Cumulative Meta-analysis of Aprotinin for
Perioperative Bleeding (3)
Where was Equipoise?
(3) Fergusson, Glass, Hutton, Shapiro Clinical
Trials 2218, 2005
6
Ellen Roche
Would Ellen be alive today, if the Hexamethonium
trials had been registered?
Ellen Roche, a Healthy Volunteer
7
Trial Registration
  • Greater (Highest, Common) Good
  • Probability of real benefit to an individual is
    low
  • Subjects often consent to benefit Society

8
Jesse Gelsinger
What's the worst that can happen to me? I
die, and it's for the babies." (4)
(4) New York Times, 28 Nov 1999
9
Trial Registration
  • Subjects have the right to believe that any
    information derived from their participation will
    be fully and freely disclosed for the common good

10
Trial Registration
  • Scope of Registration?
  • Respect for Persons is Unconditional and
    Universal
  • Independent of Study Design, Funding, or Location

11
Trial Registration
  • Scope of Registration
  • Respect for Persons is Unconditional and
    Universal
  • Independent of Study Design, Funding, Location
  • All Human Research

12
Trial Registration
  • Ethical Review and Registration
  • Determine state of knowledge, including prior,
    current and planned studies
  • Determine role of other ethical review bodies
  • Ensure continuing disclosure

13
Trial Registration
  • Ethical Review and Registration have Reciprocal
    Relationship
  • Registration is essential to ensure maximum
    Transparency and Accountability
  • Registration includes ensuring appropriate
    Ethical Review

14
Trial Registration
  • Ethical review bodies can use registry data to
    monitor other ethical review and ongoing
    disclosure
  • Unique identifiers can be used to link all
    documentation, including ethics review and
    subject materials

15
Trial Registration
  • Human subject research and review is becoming
    increasingly complex and evolving
  • Multi-Centred
  • Multi-Sponsored
  • Globalised
  • Registration Joins-the-Dots, and makes a
    Net-work, a Culture of Collaboration

16
Trial RegistrationStakeholders to Collaborators
  • Society
  • Subjects
  • Researchers
  • Institutions
  • Funders
  • Networks/Consortia
  • Ethical review community/CAREB
  • National entities
  • NCEHR
  • Professional bodies
  • Journals/Reviewers
  • Government
  • WHO
  • Provider/Consumers

No man is an Island (Donne)
17
Trial Registration
  • Issues for Consideration
  • (e.g. Ottawa II)
  • National registries? Few or Many?
  • Seamless linkage between registries
  • Ease of searching for specific knowledge
  • Mechanics of interaction of ethical review and
    registration

18
Trial Registration
  • Interaction of Ethical Review and Registration
    Who goes first?
  • Early registration maximises benefit
  • Potential Chicken and Egg Dilemma
  • Register once scientific and ethical review
    complete
  • Consider provisional registration prior to
    activation
  • But No recruitment till both steps in place

19
Trial Registration Conclusions
  • Registration is central to ethical integrity
  • Ethical review is greatly enhanced by
    registration
  • Ethical review bodies need to work in a
    collaborative research culture

20
Thankyou
Authors
Michael Goodyear Dalhousie
Lisa Golec Toronto
Collaborators
Sabina Watts McMaster
Elisabeth Clark McGill
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com