Quality Indicators for Critical Care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Quality Indicators for Critical Care

Description:

Quality Indicators for Critical Care. Jane Harper. Royal Liverpool University Hospital ... Russell Ackoff, Professor of Management, U Penn. Patients. Make me ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:4319
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: sjh55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quality Indicators for Critical Care


1
Quality Indicators for Critical Care
  • Jane Harper
  • Royal Liverpool University Hospital
  • ICS Standards, Safety and Quality Committee

2
The menu
  • What is quality?
  • Why have we just discovered it?
  • What is the national agenda?
  • What about critical care?
  • What should we do next?

3
Quality
  • Degree or standard of excellence
  • (Collins)

4
Quality is a term so general and ambiguous as to
be almost completely meaningless. Use it as often
as you can!"
  • Russell Ackoff,
  • Professor of Management, U Penn

5
Patients
  • Make me better effectiveness
  • Dont hurt me safety
  • (prevent MRSA), make me feel safe
  • Be kind to me patient experience
  • Give me pain relief
  • care about me

6
The menu
  • What is quality?
  • Why have we just discovered it?
  • What is the national agenda?
  • What about critical care?
  • What should we do next?

7
Per capita healthcare expenditure, 1996
8
Per capita healthcare expenditure 1970-2005
9
(No Transcript)
10
NHS Reforms 1997-2006
  • More money, more staff, more beds
  • More local responsibility
  • GPs pay partially dependent on quality measures
  • how do you maintain standards?
  • National regulation
  • NICE, CHI, NSFs
  • Targets no more 4 hour waits in Emergency
  • Payment by results
  • Reform fatigue

11
Numbers of ICU Beds
12
Patients on waiting lists
13
Dr Foster data HSMR
14
Life expectancy/ GPs per local authority
15
Choosing quality measures
  • In God we trust
  • All others must bring data
  • Robert Hayden

16
The menu
  • What is quality?
  • Why have we just discovered it?
  • What is the national agenda?
  • What about critical care?
  • What should we do next?

17
  • Google Darzi 249,000 results (0.35 s)
  • Darzi, qualilty 87,200

18
NHS Next Stage Review
Professor the Lord Darzi KBE Parliamentary
Under-Secretary of State
19
Quality at the heart of the NHS
  • Getting the basics right first time, every time
  • Improvements in safety, enforced by the new Care
    Quality Commission to tackle, for example,
    healthcare acquired infection
  • Independent clinical standards and priority
    setting
  • NICE expanded to set and approve independent
    quality standards
  • A new National Quality Board will give
    transparent advice to Ministers regarding top
    clinical priorities
  • Quality of care measured from the frontline up
  • Every organisation will be required by law to
    publish Quality Accounts just as they publish
    financial accounts
  • All staff will have access to NHS Evidence
    service
  • Web based portal on what high quality care looks
    like, and how to deliver it

20
In the post-Darzi NHS QIPPCommissioning
imperatives
  • Quality safety, personal experience and
    effectiveness
  • Innovation
  • Productivity Lean methods, PDSA cycles,
    touch-time
  • Prevention prevent admissions
  • Pathways PROMs
  • Less concern with structure/process, more
    outcomes
  • disinvesting misuse, underuse, overuse

21
Quality Agenda post-DarziLead National Quality
Board
  • Quality Standards (approx 20) NICE
  • Quality Metrics (200) Information centre
  • Quality Accounts Trusts
  • CQIN PCTs
  • Quality Observatories SHA
  • Clinical Excellence awards ACCEA
  • Quality Outcomes Framework NICE

22
(No Transcript)
23
Work of the NQB
  • System alignment
  • Mid-Staffs review, clinical prioritisation
  • Tools and techniques
  • NICE quality standards, QIs, QAs
  • Leadership
  • MRSA new goals to replace 50 reduction target
  • CEA

24
NICE quality standards
  • Quality standard specific, concise statement
  • Evidence-based
  • Markers of quality care
  • 6-10 statements/ quality standard
  • CVA, specialist neonatal care, VTE prevention,
    dementia
  • The new targets, NSFs

25
Key Quality Indicators
26
Quality Metrics
  • National
  • Quality indicators
  • National Audits
  • Regional network
  • Local
  • Clinical performance indicators
  • PROMs
  • NICE audit
  • Complaints
  • Dr Foster

27
The problem
  • Engagement
  • Data
  • Validation

28
Choosing quality measures
  • How effective is the measure is it important?
  • How costly is it to implement is it achievable?
  • What perverse consequences are produced?
  • Will we want to do it?
  • Is this the new NSF/ target?

29
The Specialist Societies and QIs
30
ICS SSQ QIs Aim
  • Relevant - evidence available
  • Important
  • Measureable standard definitions
  • Collectible by all units
  • Based on good practice, professional opinion
  • Distinguished from standards
  • Define up to 20 that are relevant for use in UK
    intensive care units
  • Use to
  • Benchmark units
  • Assess quality improvement programmes
  • Research

31
The Process
  • Literature review
  • Expert opinion
  • Disseminated to membership
  • Ranked on modified Likert scale
  • Health warning self-selected sample

32
Quality indicators
  • Relevant
  • Important
  • Measureable
  • Collectible
  • Based on evidence-based practice
  • Structure, process, outcome

33
Examples
  • Computerised Physician Order Entry
  • CVA thrombolysis
  • 24/7 intensivist availablity
  • Nurse patient ratio
  • Catheter-related blood stream infection
  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia

34
Health warning
  • Self-selected individuals responded
  • Of the expert group, 44 responded
  • Of the entire membership, 73 responses
  • Some members were sceptical
  • Analysis simple

35
Structure
  • Computer-assisted physician order entry
  • Consultant cover 24/7 by intensivist
  • Patientnurse ratio
  • Quality-improvement programme in place
  • Patient/family satisfaction
  • Weaning protocols
  • Outreach
  • Rehabilitation
  • MDT ward round
  • Pharmacists
  • Donation
  • SAQ
  • Handover

36
Process
  • Ongoing care bundle audits
  • Proportion of discharges between 2201 and 0659
  • Readmissions within 48 hours of discharge
  • Formal evaluation of delirium
  • End-of-life care pathway in place
  • Daily goals
  • Early enteral feeding
  • Hand hygiene audit
  • Sepsis bundle
  • Morbidity/ mortality meetings

37
Outcome
  • Standardised mortality ratio
  • Proportion of patients receiving mechanical
    ventilation
  • Number of non-clinical transfers
  • Incidence of unit-acquired MRSA bacteraemias
  • Incidence of all unit-acquired bacteraemias
  • Unit-acquired MRSA or Cdiff
  • Measurement of patient-family satisfaction in
    place
  • Days of 100 occupancy
  • Number of organ donors as a of those eligible
    to donate
  • CR-BSI
  • Incidence of VAP
  • Early enteral nutrition
  • CVA thrombolysis
  • ACS Rx
  • End of life care pathway
  • Falls
  • Reintubation rate

38
Mean/ median highest scores
  • 24/7 intensivist (8.9, 10) n63
  • Nurse/ patient ratio (8.6, 9) n66
  • Audit of hand hygiene (8.4, 9) n43
  • Non-clinical transfers (8.3, 9) n67
  • CR-BSI (7.9, 9)

39
Mean, median lowest scores
  • CVA thrombolysis (5.1, 5) n60
  • CPOE (5.19, 5) n63
  • MV (5.4, 6) n64
  • Reintubation rate (5.5, 5) n24
  • Organ donation (5.9, 6) n66

40
Wide range (example CPOE)
41
Organ Donation
42
VAP
43
Top 20
  • Intensivist 24/7
  • Nursepatient ratio
  • Hand hygiene compliance
  • Non-clinical transfers
  • Morbidity/mortality review
  • Unit-acquired bacteraemias
  • Unit-acquired MRSA
  • CR-BSI
  • Readmission within 48h
  • Discharges 2201-0659
  • Unit acquired Cdiff or MRSA
  • End of Life care
  • SMR
  • Isolation
  • Early enteral nutrition
  • Days of 100 occupancy
  • Daily goals
  • Structured handover
  • Multidisciplinary ward rounds

44
Conclusions
  • Quality means different things to different
    people
  • We accept QIs which are
  • Not always evidence-based
  • Wide range of views amongst professionals
  • Family/ patient involvement
  • How do you use these data to improve care?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com