Large-scale geomorphology: Classical concepts reconciled and integrated with contemporary ideas via a surface process model - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Large-scale geomorphology: Classical concepts reconciled and integrated with contemporary ideas via a surface process model

Description:

What can we learn from it? ... As envisaged by Hack (1960) Penck Framework. How do the conditions of this model. differ from M1-M4? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Wen123
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Large-scale geomorphology: Classical concepts reconciled and integrated with contemporary ideas via a surface process model


1
Large-scale geomorphology Classical concepts
reconciled and integrated with contemporary ideas
via a surface process model
Kooi and Beaumont 1996
Photo credit John S. Shelton
2
3 Scales
  • Micro
  • Uniform gradient
  • No channels or hillslopes represented
  • Meso
  • Groups of microscale subsystems
  • Individual interfluves
  • Macro
  • Groups of mesoscale subsystems
  • Model landscape which consists of many drainage
    basins
  • When this is in steady state, so are the smaller
    subsystems

3
Model Formulation Equations
Short range transport modeled as linear diffusion
(hillslope)
Diffusivity
Long range transport (fluvial)
Local discharge
Downstream slope
Transport coefficient
Precipitation
Sediment flux
Erosion length scale
Local undercapacity of the river
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
What variable is key for M1? Is this model
useful? What can we learn from it?
7
Steady state landscape as envisaged by Hack
(1960) and Penck (1972), and adjustement to
liothology as envisaged by Hack (1960)
8
Resistant rock band need greater relief and
steeper slopes to achieve steady state. As
envisaged by Hack (1960)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Penck Framework
How do the conditions of this model differ from
M1-M4?
13
Shows many characteristics of Davis (1899) cycle
of erosion
14
(No Transcript)
15
King (1953, 1962)
16
Evolves more by Davis type downwearing than by
King type backwearing
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Summation
  • Role of baselevels, grade, steady state
    equilibrium landforms
  • Davis type (downwearing peneplanation)
  • Penck type (waxing and waning development)
  • King type (escarpment retreat, pediplanation)
  • Hack type (dynamic equilibrium, response times,
    geometrical complex response)
  • The key factors that control the integration of
    these concepts in the model framework are the
    nature of the tectonic uplift geometry and its
    timescales.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com