Trade vs' Aid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Trade vs' Aid

Description:

Reduce agricultural subsidies for nonfood items ... to about 24,000 and just 3,000 U.S. workers make sneakers (not the cheap ones) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:632
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: darryl51
Category:
Tags: aid | sneakers | trade

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Trade vs' Aid


1
Trade vs. Aid
  • Rich Nation strategies for helping the Poor in
    Poor Countries

2
Pro-poor Nation Trade Strategies
  • Open markets in garments, footwear and
    Agriculture
  • Reduce agricultural subsidies for nonfood items
  • Encourage poor countries to open markets, to FDI
    and to join the WTO as China did in 2001.
  • Promote regional trade blocs favoring poorer
    nations, such as Nafta, the FTAA, or the EU,
  • Let poor consumers buy clothing shoes, computers,
    from poor countries such as China, Bangladesh w/o
    an extra 20-30 tax.

3
Increase Foreign Aid by
  • Increasing conditional multilateral aid
    disbursements (World Bank, ADB, etc.)
  • Contribute to UN Aids-Malaria-TB fund
  • Debt-relief forgive debt of poorest countries
  • Increased food aid via the World Food Program?

4
Six Advantages of Increasing Trade with Poor
Nations
  • Encourages work and creates jobs about 35 jobs
    in LDCs for each OECD job lost, in fact, lower
    tariffs likely adds jobs both in the U.S. and
    abroad.
  • Reduces cost of basic foods and clothing.
  • Low wages target the poor (self-targeting)
  • Reduces immigration, speeds convergence
  • Fights terrorism? (see Kristof Let them
    Sweat).
  • Undermines local elites, reduces corruption and
    SIGs influence in the U.S. Congress.

5
Disadvantages (difficulties) of Increasing Trade
with Poor Countries
  • May increase inequality initiallyurban, skilled
    worker bias (small farmers excepted).
  • Threatens jobs in the OECD (not really!)
  • Political Opposition threat to local firms
    creates political opposition within OECD.
  • Puts U.S. consumers in contact with severe
    poverty
  • Does not reach some disadvantaged groups
    Geographically isolated, ill or otherwise unable
    to work in export industries.

6
Advantages of Cash and in-kind Foreign Aid
  • Aid can be effective, if it is well targeted
    food is an example that has stimulated growth in
    LDCs.
  • Can improve health and education, pre-requisites
    for broad benefits from globalization.
  • Can reach ill and isolated poor in rural areas.
  • Cost of aid can be low (food aid- farm
    surpluses).
  • Can save or prevent failed nations such as
    Somolia or Afghanistan remove safe havens for
    terrorists.
  • Debt Relief can give some poor countries with a
    history of political instability a new start
    (Bono).

7
Disadvantages of Increasing Aid
  • Fosters corruption, enhances power of government
    and local elites.
  • Can undermine work and investment incentives.
  • Hard to target lots of leakage.
  • Politically unpopular due to popular awareness of
    above problems.
  • Food aid can undermine local farm profits.
  • Debt relief reduces access and amount of
    international credit and future aid.

8
Six point World Bank GGP Agenda includes both
Trade and Aid
  • Doha Trade liberalization Round (pp. 155 55-64)
  • Investment climate- governance (pp.156,85-87,121-2
    5)
  • Primary education (pp. 157 85-87)
  • Social Protection for workers (pp.158,
    112-14,117-19)
  • More foreign aid (p. 159 and 67-68)
  • Debt Relief for HIPCs (p. 159 and 67-68)
  • Page numbers refer to World Bank Globalization,
    Growth and Poverty.

9
What is the Doha WTO Agenda?
  • A break from TRIPs (patent restrictions on drug
    use and production) in Pharmaceuticals until
    2016 but other IPRs will be respected.
  • Accelerate the ATC to phase out quotas and high
    tariffs on garments and footwear.
  • Begin discussions of how to reduce farm subsidies
    in the EU, U.S. and Japan both to give LDC
    farmers access to these markets and to stop
    dumping of subsidized farm products.

10
Reducing Garment and footwear trade barriers can
benefit the poor in the U.S. and in LDCs
  • Poor consumers are hit hardest by higher cost low
    end clothing.
  • Pakistan, Indonesia and Bangladesh along with
    Tunisia, Jordan etc. are important allies who how
    pay big taxes to sell their products in the U.S.
    market.
  • Low wage jobs in these industries target the
    poorest workers (women) very effectively.

11
In the U.S., trade taxes hit poor families
hardest, taking away 3-5 days of income.
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
Tariffs raise the price of cheap shoes by 50,
high taxes on poor families.
15
But dont tariffs and quotas save American jobs?
Probably not. They costs U.S. jobs
  • Tariffs are high taxes, that discourage
    employment and sales the U.S. International
    Trade Commission (2) says ending protection in
    garments and shoes would increase employment in
    the U.S. instead of handing 300 over to the
    government, single parent families would spend it
    on other goods and services, creating more jobs
    in their communities but not jobs making shoes
    and clothes.
  • Employment in the garment and shoes has declined
    as fast as other protected sectors despite very
    high rates of protection quotas and escalating
    tariffs.

16
Some jobs will be lost in garments and shoe
industries, but just a few
  • Employment in ladies garments has fallen to about
    24,000 and just 3,000 U.S. workers make sneakers
    (not the cheap ones).
  • These workers can be assisted with better
    targeted adjustment assistance they will switch
    jobs be as well off, and poor families will save
    hundreds of dollars per year (see Kletzer and
    Litan (2001) A prescription to relieve worker
    Anxiety IIF (see web page).

17
Conclusions on Trade
  • Trade liberalization in Textiles and Non-food
    Agriculture can help millions of the poorest, and
    save all American consumers moneyan almost
    painless cure when combined with adjustment
    assistance for displaced workers.
  • The WTO ATC should be implemented and
    accelerated, just as a tax reduction measure.
  • There is still a role for Foreign Aid however,

18
References, Further Reading
  • U.S. International Trade Commission, (USITC)
    (2002)Economic Effects of Significant Import
    Restraints Third Update, July, available at
    ftp//ftp.usitc.gov/pub/reports/studies/pub3519.pd
    f.
  • The Truth about Industrial country tariffs
    September 2002, v. 39 no. 3, Finance and
    Development (see course web page)
  • Gresser, Edward, (2002) Toughest on the Poor
    Tariffs, Taxes and the Single Mom Policy Report,
    September (see web page)
  • Lori G. Kletzer, Litan, Robert (2001)A
    Prescription to Relieve Worker Anxiety
    International Economic Policy Briefs (IIE)
  • (see web page or www.iie.com/policybri
    efs/news01-2.htm)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com