What does Texas need for Medicaid children - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

What does Texas need for Medicaid children

Description:

Evidence for psychometrics of brief screens. Ages and Stages/PEDS for development ... Only major indicators of child health worsening. Increased use of other ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: Scri8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What does Texas need for Medicaid children


1
What does Texas need for Medicaid children?
  • Improving Medical Home
  • Services in Primary Care
  • November 2007

2
Disclosure/ Acknowledgement
  • Health eTouch is trademarked by Nationwide
    Childrens Hospital.
  • Supported through grants from
  • the National Institutes of
  • Mental Health and Drug Abuse

3
Improving Medical Home Services Goals for Today
  • State of MH Services
  • Central premise
  • Existing solutions
  • An alternative solution
  • Recommendations

4
State of Mental Health ServicesWhat We Know,
What We Do
5
State of MH ServicesWhat We Know
  • Improvements in screening techniques
  • Improvements in assessment tools
  • Improvements in treatment technologies

6
State of MH ServicesWhat We Know
  • Improvements in Screening Techniques
  • Evidence for psychometrics of brief screens
  • Ages and Stages/PEDS for development
  • PSC/SDQ for emotion/behavior
  • CRAFFT for drug use
  • Routine use increases identification

7
State of MH ServicesWhat We Know
  • Improvements in Assessment Tools
  • PHQ-A for physician administration
  • Computerized DISC for parents/child
  • Depression, anxiety, ADHD rating scales

8
State of MH ServicesWhat We Know
  • Improvements in Treatments
  • http//nrepp.samhsa.gov/
  • 30 meta-analyses
  • 50 community effectiveness studies
  • 100s of randomized trials
  • 28 for antidepressant drugs alone

9
State of MH ServicesWhat We Do
  • In Primary Care
  • Low recognition
  • Under-dosing
  • Low rates of followup
  • Inadequate referral processes

10
State of MH ServicesWhat We Do
  • In Specialty Care
  • Difficult access
  • High rates of no-show
  • Inconsistent diagnoses
  • Wide variation in treatment practices

11
State of MH ServicesWhat We Do
  • Consequences
  • Only major indicators of child health worsening
  • Increased use of other medical services
  • Stigma
  • Highest rates of dropout

12
Central Premise
13
Central Premise
  • We know
  • How to screen
  • How to evaluate and assess
  • How to treat
  • But we dont do these things.
  • We need a delivery system that is accessible,
    equitable, reliable, effective, efficient.

14
Existing Solutions
15
Existing Solutions
  • Primary Care Physician-focused efforts
  • Specialty-focused efforts
  • System-focused efforts

16
Existing Solutions
  • Flaws
  • Patient-physician dyad model
  • Physician-centric roles
  • Chronic nature of conditions
  • Lack of continuity across sites and time
  • Segregation of MH from other conditions
  • Paper based

17
An Alternative Solution
18
An Alternative SolutionSystem Attributes
  • Patient Centered
  • Equitable
  • Efficient
  • Effective
  • Safe
  • Digital

19
An Alternative SolutionPopulation Health
Management
  • Population Health Management
  • Organized and planned approach to caring for
    group
  • Anticipatory
  • Not physician or single patient focus

20
An Alternative SolutionComponents
  • Chronic Care Model
  • Patient/Family Engagement
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Workbook exercises
  • Decision Support
  • Guidelines and pathways
  • Automated order sets

21
An Alternative SolutionComponents
  • Chronic Care Model
  • Monitoring systems
  • System accountability for preventive and
    treatment tracking
  • Community support
  • Mapping and coordination
  • Integration of tools across systems
  • Financing and organizational support

22
An Alternative SolutionComponents
  • Information integration
  • Automated screening/communication tools
  • Facilitated tracking/engagement
  • Online/telephony support services

23
Health eTouch Health Service Model
24
Youths are given the tablet while in the primary
care waiting room.
25
Stylus or finger used. For privacy, the system
moves to the next question as response is entered.
26
The screening report and recommendations are
printed.
27
The clinician can follow-up on any issues
identified in the computerized screening.
28
Health eTouch Screening Results
High levels of behavioral health risk found in
nine urban primary care clinics serving a
Medicaid population.
29
Results Frequency of Recommendations for
Treatment of Drug Use by PCPs
Recommended counseling, referral, medication or
other interventions. OR 2.31, p lt .001.
30
User Satisfaction
Over 95 of users we satisfied or very satisfied
with their experience.
31
Overall User Perceptions of Health eTouch
Users also found the system to be easy, useful,
and trustworthy.
32
An Alternative SolutionMechanism
  • Regionalization of services (APA, 2007)
  • Characteristics of evidence based mental health
    care
  • Standardized assessments
  • Integrated medication and psychotherapy
  • Evidence based treatments
  • Titration trials and outcome monitoring
  • Coordination with medical care and education

33
An Alternative SolutionMechanism
  • Regionalization of Services
  • Models such as cystic fibrosis, transplant,
    sickle cell, genetic disorders, trauma, burn
    care, pediatric cancer
  • Population health management

34
Improving ServicesRecommendations
  • Access
  • Short Term
  • Long Term

35
Improving ServicesRecommendations
  • Access
  • North Carolina Medicaid reforms
  • Tele-psychiatry and psychology reimbursement
  • Private insurance reform
  • Pay for performance incentives
  • Screening reimbursement

36
Improving ServicesRecommendations
  • Short term
  • Standardize screening and assessment
  • Monitor/certify referral resources
  • Evaluate and expand TMAPS
  • Monitor psychiatric drug use
  • Telephone consultation support (eg Mass)

37
Improving Services Long Term
  • Regional primary care support
  • Telephone engagement
  • Monitoring of patients on drugs
  • Tracking referrals
  • Mapping of referral resources

38
Improving ServicesLong Term
  • Regional MH specialty services
  • Case coordination
  • Transparency of outcomes
  • Standardized assessments

39
Conclusions
  • Patient/PCP/specialist delivery ineffective
  • Physician focused solutions inadequate
  • Population model with chronic care parts holds
    hope
  • Requires commitment to digital information and
    regional responsibility for low income care

40
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com