Liverpool Hope - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Liverpool Hope

Description:

... can improve the teaching' at degree level, ... teaching posts. ... tutors enthusiasm towards mathematics and teaching mathematics has been an inspiration to me. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: tda8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Liverpool Hope


1
Liverpool Hope Edge Hill Mathematics
Enhancement Course 2004/05/06
  • From enhancement to the classroom a quality
    experience

2
Phil Bamber bamberp_at_hope.ac.uk
Mark Patmore
mark.patmore_at_ntu.ac.uk
  • Some issues
  • Consider the course divided into three phases
  • The course contents, delivery and assessment
  • Application and selection
  • The final product

3
Course Philosophy
  • Intensive 26 weeks 500 hours of tutor contact
    time
  • Peer / tutor support
  • Mathematics education tutors
  • Developing mathematical confidence and rigour
  • Balance of depth and breadth
  • Exposure to new technology
  • Deeper understanding of fundamental mathematics

4
Specification for the Pre Initial Teacher
Training Mathematics Enhancement CourseTTA,
February 2003
  • One aim of the Mathematics Enhancement Course
    (MEC) is to begin to develop a profound
    understanding of fundamental mathematics. This
    means that subject knowledge is characterised by
  • Connectedness as against fragmentation
  • Multiple perspectives a flexible and adaptive
    understanding
  • Deep understanding of basic concepts, as against
    surface procedural knowledge Page 6

5
Subject Knowledge and Pedagogical KnowledgeDoug
French, 2003
  • Moreover teachers need subject knowledge that is
    linked closely to pedagogical knowledge.
  • For example, an awareness of common
    misconceptions and ways of looking at them, the
    importance of forging links and connections
    between different mathematical ideas and the
    flexibility that comes from seeing alternative
    ways of looking at the same idea or problem are
    all essential for effective teaching
  • Mathematics Education Review, April 2003

6
Specification for the Pre Initial Teacher
Training Mathematics Enhancement CourseTTA,
February 2003
  • Indicative approaches to learning and teaching
  • Collaborative learning is an important way in
    which participants can come to recognise the
    enhancement in their learning which as occurs as
    a result of self reflection and relating their
    understanding to that of others. This is one
    vehicle for deepening the understanding of
    mathematical concepts.

7
Course Features
  • December registration
  • Induction residential
  • Subject audit / Keele diagnostic test
  • Personal tutor
  • Pure and applied teaching blocks
  • Range of assessment including the Open book
    exam
  • School placement
  • Fundamental sessions
  • (Misconceptions/History/Geometry)
  • Peer teaching
  • Reflection on learning
  • Individual inquiry
  • School interventions

8
School intervention - What did it involve?
  • Needs led
  • MEC tutor development of resources
  • Thorough preparation of MEC students
  • Discussion of issues
  • Reflection on pupils learning

9
Motivation Rich contextualised learning
Confession of interest Change the ecology of
learning
Learning Community
Participants
Pupils
Teachers
Tutors
Strengthened links with partner
schools Professional Development
Professional Development Support New ideas
10
Service Learning?
  • Service Learning has tremendous potential to
    enable colleges and universities to meet their
    goals for student learning and development while
    making unique contributions to addressing
    community needs. (p.xvii)
  • Service Learning must be grounded in a network
    of authentic democratic, reciprocal partnerships
    (p.6)
  • Building Partnerships for Service Learning
  • Barbara Jacoby, 2003.

11
POST SATS Thinking Mathematically

Challenging misconceptions
Deep understanding of important
concepts Algebra, percentages
12
POST SATS Fun Maths Roadshow
Problem solving, confidence building, group
bonding, interesting activities, great resource
..FUN!
13
The Course
  • Different approaches yet still very similar in
    content. Do providers, (referring providers),
    know what is in the course?
  • Different assessment methods.Do providers have
    confidence in the standards set and knowledge
    acquired?

14
Application and selection
  • Issues
  • (a) Applying direct to the MEC or (b) applying
    for PGCE/GTP and being referred or (c) making a
    joint application.
  • (a) Applying direct
  • should be discouraged and the applicant will be
    recommended to apply through GTTR for the PGCE or
    to apply directly to a GTP provider

15
Application and selection
  • (b) and (c) Applying for PGCE
  • problems with GTTR
  • delays in forwarding applications
    sometimes caused e.g. by telling referees that
    they dont need to submit their reference until
    December.

16
Application and selection
  • (b) and (c) Applying for PGCE
  • Problems with providers who are
    unable/unwilling to bring forward their
    interview dates.
  • Problems of consistency between providers
    with respect to entry qualifications

17
Application and selection
  • (b) and (c) Applying for GTP
  • problems with providers who are
  • unable/unwilling to bring forward their
  • interview dates.
  • This is sometimes caused or worsened by problems
    in finding school placements.

18
Views of participants
  • At university I was taught by mathematicians who
    obviously knew a lot of maths but did not care
    how much I understood!
  • I dropped out after 4 months and thought I would
    never be able to become a maths teacher.
  • Unless we can improve the teaching at degree
    level, the MEC is vital.
  • I would have given up my dream.

19
Looking back on the MEC experience from first
teaching posts.
  • Because the course went beyond A level it
    provided me with a much deeper understanding of
    mathematics. At times the course felt over the
    top or excessive compared to the teaching
    requirement. However, I now feel that this
    experience has given me a wealth of confidence.
    MEC04
  • I would recommend the MEC to anyone who was
    looking to teach maths even those with maths
    degrees particularly from a number of years
    ago MEC04

20
Which features of the MEC have been most
effective in helping you prepare for your
teaching career?
  • The vast majority of the course was spot on,
    some of the delivery has become more relevant to
    me now that I am teaching MEC04
  • The tutors enthusiasm towards mathematics and
    teaching mathematics has been an inspiration to
    me. It is the same way I would like to teach the
    subject, so that my students will be inspired as
    well. MEC05

21
Spin offs
  • Regional collaboration
  • Funding for work across regions
  • Resources personnel and hardware/software
  • Positive impact on non MEC PGCE students
  • Model for CPD for current non specialist maths
    teachersand others?

22
The Final product
  • Trainees seem
  • more enthusiastic and better prepared for the
    PGCE
  • more willing to engage and learn and take
    responsibility for their learning,
  • And they show evidence of mathematical
    competence and understanding

23
Other issues
  • Impact on other provision e.g. 2 year PGCE
  • Do schools i.e. HTs and HoDs, know and understand
    the MEC?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com