Title: Informal Document No.21 53rd GRRF, 3-7 February 2003 Agenda Item 6.1. Status of tire rulemaking actions
1Informal Document No.2153rd GRRF, 3-7 February
2003Agenda Item 6.1.Status of tire rulemaking
actions
- Submission by the United States of America for
information on the status of the various tire
rulemaking actions
2TREAD ACT
- HR 5164 signed into law on November 1, 2000
- Transportation Recall Enhancement,
Accountability, and Documentation (TREAD) Act - 3 Sections relate to tire performance items
3SECTION 10 - TIRE STANDARD UPGRADE
- Revise and Update tire standards FMVSS 109 and
FMVSS 119 - Rulemaking must be completed by June 1, 2002
4SECTION 11 - IMPROVED TIRE INFORMATION
- Tire Labeling
- Improve labeling for consumers to easily identify
tires involved in a recall - Initiate rulemaking within 30 days
- Complete rulemaking by June 1, 2002
- Inflation Levels and Load Limits
- Consumer information on tire load limits
- Consumer information on maintaining proper tire
inflation levels - No statutory deadlines established
5SECTION 13 - TIRE PRESSURE WARNING
- Require a warning system in the vehicle to
indicate when the tire is significantly
under-inflated - Complete rulemaking by November 1, 2001
- Requirement must become effective 2 years after
completion of rulemaking
6PROPOSALS FOR NEW FMVSS 139
- Proposal published March 5, 2002
- Light Vehicle Standard for vehicles up to 10,000
lbs GVWR - High Speed test Upgraded
- Endurance test Upgraded
- Low Pressure Performance test New
- Bead Unseating test Upgraded
- Road Hazard Impact test Upgraded
- Aging Effects test New
7BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- High Speed test
- RMA accepts test with some minor revisions for
ambient temperature and parameters for testing LT
tire - Alliance supports GTS-2000 proposal Ford
suggested 105 load at rated speed - Consumer groups prefer test based on speed
ratings - UN/ECE supports a test based on the speed rating
of the tire
8BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Endurance test
- RMA recommended lower loads for shorter duration
also different test parameters for LT tires - Ford suggested adding 48 hours at 130 load to
the current FMVSS 109 - Consumer Groups supported a higher load of
100/110/115 - UN/ECE believes that there is no value in this
test
9BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Low Pressure Test
- RMA supports Option 1 of test, with revised
parameters for LT tires - ETRTO says there is no justification for such a
test - Alliance suggests that the low pressure test be
run after the aging test - Consumers Union favors a 4-hour low pressure test
- UN/ECE is opposed to test because test conditions
are excessive
10BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Road Hazard Impact test
- RMA said that a road hazard impact test is not
necessary for regulatory purposes - Alliance wants to retain the plunger test until a
better replacement is developed - Consumer groups say that the test has limited
value - UN/ECE believed that more research is needed
11BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Bead Unseating test
- RMA suggests that the agency keep the current
test - Alliance suggested a revision to load values used
and that a test rim be specified - Consumers Union recommended more research
- UN/ECE believes that that there is no safety
benefit from this test
12BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Aging Test
- RMA does not support an aging test. Oven aging
is least objectionable if agency has to choose a
test - Alliance believes that proposed tests may not
increase safety - Ford recommends a revised version of oven aging
proposal using blend of O2/N2 - Consumer Groups think more research is needed
- UN/ECE says it could support an oven aging test
but more research is needed
13BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Tire Selection Criteria
- RMA supports retaining 1.10 de-rating for
P-metric tires and the proposal for normal load
to be 85 of load at placard - Alliance urged the agency to keep normal load at
88 of max load - Consumer groups want a reserve load of 18-20
- UN/ECE urged agency to adopt a reserve load
requirement
14BRIEF SUMMARY OF COMMENTS TO NPRM
- Effective Date
- RMA supports an effective date for full
compliance 5 years after the final rule - Alliance supports a September 1, 2007 effective
date, with optional compliance prior to that date - Consumer groups want the new rule effective as
soon as possible
15SUMMARY
- Next Steps for Final Rule
- Currently being reviewed by the Secretary of
Transportation - Then forwarded to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review - After these reviews and approvals, published in
the Federal Register - 45-day petition for reconsideration
-
-
16SUMMARY OF TPMS and TIRE LABELING
- TPMS (Docket 8572)
- Final Rule published June 5, 2002
- 13 Petitions for reconsideration received
- Final Rule petitions for reconsideration will
be published after review/approval process - Tire Labeling (Docket 11157 13678)
- Final Rule published November 18, 2002
- 7 Petitions for reconsideration received
- Final Rule petitions for reconsideration will
be published after review/approval process