Gas Industry Governance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Gas Industry Governance

Description:

WELLINGTON MELBOURNE SYDNEY. www.sahainternational.com. Gas Industry ... ( Toronto Globe & Mail 27 Jan 2004) ... the net benefits to the public of control; and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:58
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: sahaenergy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gas Industry Governance


1
Gas Industry Governance
  • 2004 New Zealand Petroleum Conference
  • Presented by Dr Govind SahaCEO, Saha
    International Ltd9 March 2003

Contact details Govind Saha Saha International
Limited Level 4, Clayton Ford House The
Terrace Wellington 6001 NEW ZEALAND Tel. 64
(0)21 395 890 gsaha_at_sahainternational.com
Session Time 455pm 520pm
2
Topics
  • Current Situation
  • Viewpoints
  • Government Policy Statement
  • Industry viewpoint perspectives
  • Governance Models
  • Government Policy
  • Industry Response
  • Lessons from electricity
  • Components of governance
  • Options

3
Current Situation
4
The industry maintains a diversity of
organisations and interests
NGC
NGC
NGC
Shell Todd OMV
Maui
Genesis
Genesis
Nova
Nova
Wanganui Gas
Wanganui Gas
Swift Greymouth Southern Others
Methanex Contact 10 Large Users
Powerco Vector
5
A depleting gas supply puts pressure on lowest
value-added uses
250
200
150
Gas Delivered in 2002 (PJ)
Electricity Generation
100
50
Consumer energy
0
Source Energy Data File, MED (Calendar Year 2002
data)
6
Petrochemical manufacturers may not be able to
compete for higher priced gas
  • Methanex announced in November 2003 it was taking
    a 130-million writedown on its assets in New
    Zealand and at Medicine Hat in Alberta as a
    result of a loss of natural gas feedstock at
    economical prices. (Toronto Globe Mail 27 Jan
    2004)
  • Methanex has promoted its Atlas plant in Trinidad
    (63 JV with BP, 1.7mmtpa, coming onstream Q2
    2004) and its Chilean expansion (expected to be
    completed next year), which is expected to be
    completed in 2005, as part of a strategy to lower
    methanol production costs. (Reuters, 29 Jan 2004)

7
Gas is needed to meet electricity demand growth
  • Was an increased role for
  • Geothermal 6.7 ? 6.9
  • Gas 1 ? 25.5
  • Steam 0.1 ? 1.7
  • Wind 0 ? 0.4
  • Biogas 0 ? 0.2
  • Was a decreased role for
  • Hydro 75 ? 61
  • Oil 9.6 ? 0
  • Coal 6.5 ? 3.8
  • Wood 1.5 ? 0.8

Source Energy Data File, MED
8
Hydro generation cant meet electricity needs
50,000
45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
Electricity Generation GWh
25,000
20,000
Total Annual Generation
15,000
Hydro Generation
10,000
5,000
0
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
Source Energy Data File, MED. 2002 figures are
estimates. CAE Electricity Supply Demand to
2015. .
Calendar Year
9
Hydro generation cant meet electricity needs,
despite Project Aqua
50,000
45,000
6,900 GWh
40,000
35,000
30,000
Electricity Generation GWh
CAE 2012 forecast (expected)
25,000
20,000
Total Annual Generation
15,000
Hydro Generation
10,000
5,000
0
Z
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2012
Source Energy Data File, MED. 2002 figures are
estimates. CAE Electricity Supply Demand to
2015. .
Calendar Year
10
Gas is also used to balance hydro generation
fluctuations
30,000
Hydro generation
Gas-fired generation
25,000
20,000
Gas used for generation (PJ)
15,000
Hydro and gas-fired electricity generation GWh/yr
109.8
89.2
92.6
10,000
95.8
97.0
95.2
67.7
5,000
0
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
Source Energy Data File, MED. 2002 figures are
estimates.
Calendar Year
11
Generators await fuel supply certainty before
building new capacity
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
Pre-Maui Peaking Capacity Removed 1997 Marsden
A 114MW Whirinaki 50MW 1998 Whirinaki
50MW 1999 New Plymouth 120MW 2000 Stratford
198MW Whirinaki 50MW
6,000
Net Installed Generating Capacity MW
5,000
4,000
3,000
MED Energy Data Files
2,000
CAE Electricity Supply Demand to 2015
1,000
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
As at March
12
Viewpoints
13
Government Policy Objectives for gas and
electricity are similar, but independent
  • Gas
  • The Government's overall policy objective for gas
    is to ensure that gas is delivered to existing
    and new customers in a safe, efficient, fair,
    reliable, and environmentally sustainable manner.
  • The Government favours industry-led solutions
    where possible, but is prepared to use regulatory
    solutions where necessary.
  • Electricity
  • The Governments overall objective is to ensure
    that electricity is delivered in an efficient,
    fair, reliable and environmentally sustainable
    manner to all classes of consumer. Consumers
    electricity requirements should be met in a
    manner which is least-cost to the economy as a
    whole over the long term and is consistent with
    sustainable development.

Source Government Policy Statement Development
of New Zealand's Gas Industry, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, March 2003
Source Draft Government Policy Statement on
Electricity Governance, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, September 2003
14
Gas Industry Government Policy Statement
Requirements
  • Production and Wholesale Markets
  • protocols, standards and conventions for
    quality,balancing, reconciliation
  • a secondary market
  • capacity trading arrangements
  • Transmission and Distribution Networks
  • an open access regime across all
    high-pressuretransmission pipelines
  • standards and protocols across alldistribution
    pipelines
  • measurement arrangements
  • Retail Markets
  • standardised upgraded protocols relating to
    customer switching
  • consumer complaints handling
  • model consumer contracts
  • Gas Safety
  • effective, internationally consistent safety
    standards conventions.
  • ensuring competency of all those undertaking gas
    work
  • effective self-audit, monitoring and reporting on
    compliance
  • Open Access to the Maui Pipeline

Source Government Policy Statement Development
of New Zealand's Gas Industry, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, March 2003
15
Commerce Commission Gas Control Inquiry
  • Before reaching a view on whether control should
    be introduced, the Minister has asked for the
    Commission to provide, by 1 November 2004,
    specific advice on
  • whether gas pipeline services may be controlled
    in terms of section 52 of the Act
  • the methodology that the Commission considers
    appropriate for valuation of pipeline assets for
    the purposes of its advice (on the matters
    covered in the Minister's letter)
  • the net benefits to the public of control and
  • any other matter that the Commission may think
    relevant to a decision on whether control should
    be introduced.

Source Commerce Commission Terms of Reference
letterfrom Hon Pete Hodgson, Minister of Energy,
30 April 2003
16
Industry work programme
  • In response to the Gas Industry Government Policy
    Statement the industry formed an interim Gas
    Governance Establishment Group (GGEG), and
    subsequently formed the Gas Industry Steering
    Group (GISG), to facilitate the establishment of
    the work programme and structures referred to in
    the Government Policy Statement.
  • the GISG will continue the various work streams
    already initiated by the GGEG to meet other
    expectations for the sector. These are focused
    on the areas of
  • open access to gas pipelines,
  • wholesale gas balancing
  • retail customer switching
  • gas contingency planning
  • consumer complaints arrangements.(Source Phil
    James, Deputy Chairman GISG, as reported in
    National Gas Review Sept 2003)
  • So, from its inception, the governance
    arrangements do not attempt to meet all the
    requirements of the Governments policy.

17
Governance Models
18
Government Policy on Governance
  • The governing entity must
  • be representative of all stakeholders, including
    consumers
  • have an independent chair
  • have a majority of independent persons (any
    director, employee or significant shareholder of
    the supply side of the industry does not meet the
    test of independence)
  • have the independent members appointed after
    consultation with the Minister of Energy
  • not operate in the interests of individual
    participants, and
  • have the power to develop and enforce
    arrangements consistent with the Government
    Policy Statement.
  • The Government expects the Electricity
    Commission, and the Energy Commission if it is
    formed, to use persuasion, promotion and the
    provision of information and model arrangements
    to achieve policy objectives wherever possible.
    The regulation-making powers are there as an
    incentive for reaching voluntary agreements, to
    be used only if necessary.

Source Government Policy Statement Development
of New Zealand's Gas Industry, Hon Pete Hodgson,
Minister of Energy, March 2003
Source Speech introducing the Electricity and
Gas Industries Bill - first reading, Hon Pete
Hodgson, Minister of Energy, 6 November 2003
19
Government Policy on Governance (cont)
  • Provisions establishing the Energy Commission
    will not be brought into force with the rest of
    the Electricity and Gas Industries Act. They
    will be held in abeyance for use only if the
    Government decides that the gas industry has
    failed to deliver industry rules that meet the
    Governments expectations.Advantages of
    locating both electricity and gas regulatory
    functions in an Energy Commission are that the
    interrelationships between the two sectors can be
    better addressed and the skills and experience of
    the regulatory staff are likely to span both
    sectors.

Source Electricity and Gas Industries Bill28
October 2003 No. 86-1
20
Gas Industry Responses
  • Maui Mining Companies
  • 31 January 2003 Document Release Maui will seek
    to provide a pro-competitive and flexible gas
    transport regime developed on the principles
    expressed in the Access Code and good
    international practice.
  • January 2004 An open access regime on the Maui
    pipeline is still to be agreed.
  • NGC
  • January 2004 Details of NGCs post-Maui
    transmission regime have still to be announced
  • Gas Industry Steering Group
  • 18 June 2003 Media Release The formation of
    the GISG is consistent with the Governments
    expectation of a governing entity that is
    independently chaired and is representative of
    all stakeholders, including consumers. However,
    the Group is keen to see further representation
    from upstream participants, given the importance
    of the exploration and production sector to the
    overall future development of the industry.
  • So, from inception there are concerns about the
    degree of representation
  • GISG is reportedly proposing a co-regulatory
    model, whereby rule-making is undertaken by the
    industry and rule enforcement based on a
    government-regulated licencing arrangement. The
    rule coverage would include pipeline access, but
    would exclude tariff setting. Only minor changes
    are expected to be required to the Bill currently
    under consideration.

21
Lessons from electricity1. Four years after
the inquiry, governance is still not fully
established
22
Lessons from Self Governance in Electricity2.
Governance projects need funding and proponents
to succeed
  • MARIA Metering and Reconciliation Information
    Agreement
  • Very successful
  • Precursor to all others. Established
    reconciliation, enabled title tracking.
  • Proponents funding ECNZ, Transpower
    significant industry input
  • NZEM New Zealand Electricity Market Agreement
  • Relatively successful
  • Generator dominated, relied on industry structure
    that merged upstream downstream interests in
    Gentailers
  • Proponents funding ECNZ, Transpower
    significant industry input
  • MACQS Multilateral Agreement on Common Quality
    Standards
  • Never really got going.
  • Proponents funding Transpower significant
    industry input
  • EGB Electricity Governance Board.
  • Failed
  • Not complete commonality of interest
  • Commercial interests could not be compromised
  • Proponents funding Electricity generating
    industry significant industry input

23
Components of a Governance Regime
  • Rule making
  • Rule enforcement
  • Rule coverage
  • Rule implementation operation
  • Funding

24
Interests of the parties
  • Industry Members
  • Maintain existing property rights existing
    contracts
  • Improve future prospects (raise barriers to
    competition, not take on excessive risk etc)
  • Maintain a sustainable market position
  • Avoid taking on responsibility without control
  • Seek a fair allocation of risk, costs etc
  • Consumers
  • Improve future prospects (reduce future prices
    and improved service product quality)
  • Government
  • Be seen to be ensuring that the product is
    delivered in an efficient, fair, reliable and
    environmentally sustainable manner
  • Minimise risk
  • Satisfy political constituents
  • An extremely low propensity for risk means that
    it is often prepared to pay to avoid non-supply
    (taking on the Maui ToP contract, responsibility
    for the funding of electricity reserve
    generation).

25
Components of a Governance Regime Issues
  • Rule making
  • Requires more funding than an industry is often
    prepared to allocate. Free-rider issues may
    occur.
  • May require one or more strong proponents
  • Industry and consumers were not able to agree on
    market governance rules for electricity, so
    Government intervened
  • Rule enforcement
  • Through legislation if the rule-making is by
    Government
  • Through multilateral contracts if the rule-making
    is by industry consumers. Requires that
    contracts are agreed and signed by all.
    Ultimately, the signatory may need to be excluded
    if the contract is breached.
  • Rule coverage
  • The wider the industry coverage, the less likely
    self governance will work.
  • Rule implementation operation
  • Can be contracted out, especially if rules are
    fully proscribed.
  • Funding
  • Ultimately is funded by the customer or the tax
    payer
  • Arrangements should minimally distort investment
    and consumption behaviours.

26
Governance of Gas versus Electricity
27
Industry-wide self-governance
  • It has been widely believed that the industry can
    prepare better governance rules than the
    government
  • Outcome will depend on funding, commitment,
    objectives of the proponents, and time-frames.
    Government is committed but has little appetite
    for funding. A fragmented industry has mixed
    commitment and issues with funding.
  • The short time-frames may result in industry
    participants being asked to take on more risk
    than they would like. This may be alleviated by
    improved metering.
  • A major problem with self governance is to get
    all players to sign up to the arrangements.
    Options include
  • licensing requirements imposed by Government to
    make self-governance mandatory (as reportedly
    proposed by the GISG)
  • a contractual cascade (for example, initiated by
    a transmission contract from a monopoly SOE)
  • constrain the coverage of the self-governance
    arrangements to parties with like interests.

28
Legislated governance
  • May be slower to implement than industry-led
    governance
  • Design phase will require external experts rather
    than industry members
  • New Zealands supplies of consumer energy are
    arguably in as precarious a position as they were
    during the 1970s oil crisis. Legislated
    governance provides an opportunity for
    coordinating an infrastructural response to the
    risk of gas and electricity non-supply, covering
    gas exploration and alternatives such as LNG
    imports.

29
Conclusions
  • Governance structures take a considerable amount
    of time to establish. The gas industry does not
    have the luxury of time.
  • Industry-led arrangements require strong
    proponents with deep pockets.
  • For an essential service, some government
    oversight of the governance arrangements is going
    to be likely (especially if there are no major
    state owned players in the market?).
  • While a fully centralised energy planning
    approach may no longer be needed, it could be
    noted that the energy issues now facing the
    country are similar to those we faced in the
    70s, which led to the establishment of a
    dedicated Energy Ministry.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com