The Impact of a ComputerAssisted SelfInterview on the Delivery and Clinical Outcomes of HIV Care - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

The Impact of a ComputerAssisted SelfInterview on the Delivery and Clinical Outcomes of HIV Care

Description:

Early identification of nonadherence. Identify problems affecting adherence ... Patient's depressive symptoms and score. Patient's drug or alcohol use ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: rdmo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Impact of a ComputerAssisted SelfInterview on the Delivery and Clinical Outcomes of HIV Care


1
The Impact of a Computer-Assisted Self-Interview
on the Delivery and Clinical Outcomes of HIV Care
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
  • Richard D. Moore, MD, MHS
  • Beulah P. Sabundayo, PharmD, MPH
  • Jeanne Keruly, MS, CRNP
  • Greg Lucas, MD, PhD

August 29, 2006 RWCA All Titles Conference
CATS
Computer Adherence Technology Study
Project supported by HRSA Grant H97HA00266
2
Audio Computer-Assisted Self-InterviewACASI
  • Information technology used primarily in clinical
    research
  • Elicits personal/sensitive information
  • Shown to provide more valid responses than
    face-to-face interviews
  • Medication adherence
  • Certain behaviors (illicit drug use, sexual
    behaviors)

3
CATS
Computer Adherence Technology Study
  • Objective Assess if ACASI in routine clinical
    practice
  • Enhances the delivery of HIV care
  • Improves HIV clinical outcomes
  • Hypothesis ACASI feedback to clinicians will
    inform clinical practice by
  • Improve clinician-patient communication
  • Early identification of nonadherence
  • Identify problems affecting adherence
  • Improved identification of medication errors
  • Standardize evaluation of side effects
  • Identify patient misconceptions
  • Promote early treatment decisions

4
Study Design
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Enrollment 180 subjects starting HAART
  • HAART is defined according to DHHS-Kaiser 2002
    Guidelines for Antiretroviral Therapy (HAART) in
    Adults
  • 12 month intervention
  • 90 subjects randomized to no clinician feedback
    of ACASI
  • 90 subjects randomized to clinician feedback of
    ACASI at the time of clinical care visit
  • Stratified on HAART (1st vs. salvage)

5
Outcomes
  • Use of ACASI technology to enhance patient
    services
  • Enhancing patient/clinician communication
  • Adherence to ARVs
  • Identification of depression
  • Identification of substance abuse
  • Acceptance of ACASI by patients and clinicians
  • Clinical outcomes
  • HIV-1 RNA suppression at 6 and 12 months
  • CD4 lymphocyte change at 6 and 12 months
  • Duration of HAART use
  • Genotypic resistance

6
ACASI Questions Medications
  • Medications
  • Identify med
  • Dosage
  • Schedule
  • Missed doses
  • Reasons for missed doses
  • ACTG

7
ACASI Questions Depression
  • Based on the validated Hospital Anxiety
    Depression Score (HADS)
  • 5 questions
  • Overall depression score (0-15)
  • Possible 5 7
  • Probable gt 8

8
ACASI Questions Alcohol
  • Alcohol usage in past week and month

9
ACASI Questions Illicit Drug Use
  • Usage in the past month
  • Last use
  • Cocaine
  • Cocaine heroin
  • Heroin
  • Others

10
ACASI Questions Treatment Programs
  • Drug or alcohol
  • Type of program

11
Recruitment and Retention
12
Characteristics of Enrolled Subjects (N198)
Mean age (years) 43 Median age (years)
43 Range (years) 24 - 66
13
ACASI Performance
14
Patient Survey
n1 month 180 n6 month 15 n12 month 162
  • Patient ACASI Information Technology Survey
  • CHECK ONE BOX FOR EACH QUESTION
  • How comfortable did you feel answering questions
    on the computer?
  • Very comfortable
  • Somewhat comfortable
  • Neither comfortable nor uncomfortable
  • Somewhat uncomfortable
  • Very uncomfortable
  • Do you think its easier to tell personal
    information to a computer or directly to your
    doctor?
  • Much easier with the computer
  • Somewhat easier with the computer
  • I dont know
  • Somewhat easier with my doctor
  • Much easier with my doctor
  • Did answering the questions on the computer make
    you think of things that you wanted to talk to
    your doctor about?
  • Yes
  • No
  • I dont know
  • If your computer answers were given to your
    doctor, how did that affect your communication
    with your doctor?
  • Very helpful
  • Somewhat helpful
  • Neither helpful nor harmful
  • Somewhat harmful
  • Very harmful

15
Patient Survey
16
Patient Survey
Do you think its easier to tell personal
information to a computer or directly to your
doctor?
17
Patient Survey
Did answering the questions on the computer make
you think of things that you wanted to talk to
your doctor about?
18
Patient Survey
If your computer answers were given to your
doctor, how did that affect your communication
with your doctor?
19
Clinician Survey
n1 month 87 n12 month 70
  • Provider ACASI Information Technology Survey
  • Did the ACASI survey impede or interfere with
    clinic procedures or patient flow?
  • No
  • Yes
  • I dont know
  • How did the feedback report(s) from your
    patients interview(s) affect your communication
    with the patient?
  • Helpful
  • No effect
  • Harmful
  • What information in the feedback report(s_ was
    helpful in understanding barriers faced by your
    patient? CHECK ALL THAT APPLY
  • Patients self-identified medications or dosing
    scheme were different than prescribed
  • Patients self-reported adherence with HIV
    medications
  • Patients reasons for missed doses
  • Patients general knowledge of HIV treatment
  • Patients depressive symptoms and score
  • Patients drug or alcohol use
  • No information was helpful
  • Which specific clinical management decisions did
    you make that were influenced by information from
    your patients feedback reports?
  • Temporarily discontinued antiretroviral therapy

20
Clinician Survey
Did the ACASI survey impede or interfere with
clinic procedures or patient flow?
21
Clinician Survey
How did the feedback report(s) from your
patients interview(s) affect your communication
with the patient?
22
Clinician and Patient Survey
How did the feedback report(s) affect your
communication?
23
Clinician Survey
What information in the feedback report(s) was
helpful in understanding barriers faced by your
patient?
24
Clinician Survey
Which specific clinical management decisions did
you make that were influenced by information from
your patients feedback reports?
  • Other
  • Adherence
  • Depression
  • Referrals

49
57
25
Preliminary Clinical Outcomes
26
Preliminary Clinical Outcomes
27
Conclusions
  • We successfully enrolled and retained a primarily
    African American patient population with a high
    prevalence of comorbidities
  • Women and drug users were well-represented
  • ACASI was widely accepted by patients and
    clinicians
  • Both clinicians and patients felt that the ACASI
    had a positive effect on their communication with
    each other
  • Patients were more likely to share sensitive
    information with their clinicians, providing
    opportunities for risk reduction counseling
  • ACASI feedback was helpful to clinicians for
    identifying problems with adherence, depression
    and substance abuse

28
Future Directions
  • Full 12 month analysis pending
  • Confounding problems affecting adherence
  • Identification of medication errors
  • Enhanced adherence support
  • Identification of depression
  • Identification of substance abuse
  • Examine reasons for negative or neutral survey
    responses from patients and clinicians
  • Assessment of clinical disease markers

29
CATS
Computer Adherence Technology Studyat the Johns
Hopkins Moore Clinic
For more information, please contact Beulah
Sabundayo, PharmD, MPH bsabund1_at_jhmi.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com