Case study of Corporate Social Responsibility Failure in the Baltic region - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

Case study of Corporate Social Responsibility Failure in the Baltic region

Description:

New production line producing expandable polystyrene (EPS) insulation panels for buildings ... the cheapest supplier of foam polystyrene panels in the country. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: charlesw54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Case study of Corporate Social Responsibility Failure in the Baltic region


1
Case study of Corporate Social Responsibility
Failure in the Baltic region
  • Ferro-concrete plant in Ukmerges, a small town of
    30,000 in eastern Lithuania
  • New production line producing expandable
    polystyrene (EPS) insulation panels for buildings
  • granular raw material for EPS emits pentane - a
    gas so flammable that, when mixed with air, even
    heat from a single light bulb can ignite

2
Ukmerges July 2003 3 killed, 10 burn victims
  • no gas-monitoring equipment
  • ventilation was inadequate
  • a fire which resulted when a welder used a
    blowtorch the previous day unreported to the
    authorities
  • substantial amounts of pentane which is heavier
    than air, had accumulated in the foundations of
    the building.

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
Profits before Safety?
  • Company was the cheapest supplier of foam
    polystyrene panels in the country.
  • The production line had been recently renovated
    and modernised
  • production output was 9 times higher than before
    renovation.
  • Consequently, pentane levels in the occupational
    environment also increased

8
Corporate Failure
  • Company failed to execute any additional
    occupational risk hazard assessments
  • failed to indicate any explosion risk in the
    workers instructions
  • warning instructions were in Russian, not
    Lithuanian
  • regulations relative to workers protection
    against hazardous chemical substances at work
    were not adhered to
  • requirements for protecting employees working in
    a potentially explosive environment were not
    adhered to.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com