Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension

Description:

The Claim: ' blockers are good.' Outcome studies have demonstrated the ... Pitfalls of meta-analysis: Losing your marbles. The value of enlarging large studies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:117
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: sfghde
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension


1
Should beta blockers remain first choice in the
treatment of primary hypertension?
  • (aka, See, Teresa!
  • We listen.)

2
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW
  • Review the background data
  • Established roles, Proposed role
  • Study the study
  • Relevance, Validity, Results
  • Discussion points

3
BACKGROUND
  • The Claim ? blockers are good.
  • Outcome studies have demonstrated the value of ?
    blockers in patients.

4
BACKGROUND? blockers are good.
  • After myocardial infarction
  • A 1999 systematic review found that the overall
    mortality after myocardial infarction in 31
    long-term trials was 10.1 percent beta blockers
    reduced the odds of death by 23 percent (95 CI
    15-31 percent).
  • Freemantle N Cleland J, et al. ß-Blockade after
    myocardial infarction systematic review and meta
    regression analysis. BMJ 1999 Jun
    26318(7200)1730-7.

5
BACKGROUND? blockers are good.
  • With heart failure
  • A 2001 meta-analysis found that ß-blockers
    reduced mortality in CHF patients at 1 year (odds
    ratio 0.65, 95 CI 0.53-0.80) and 2 years (odds
    ratio 0.72, 95 CI 0.61-0.84). ß-blockers also
    reduced hospitalization for HF (odds ratio 0.64,
    95 CI 0.53-0.79).

Brophy JM Joseph L, et al. Beta-blockers in
congestive heart failure. A Bayesian
meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2001 Apr
3134(7)550-60.
6
BACKGROUND? blockers are good.
  • With angina pectoris
  • They improve exercise capacity, reduce
    exercise-induced ST depression, decrease the
    frequency of anginal episodes, and diminish the
    requirement for sublingual nitroglycerin.

7
BACKGROUND
  • The Question But are they that good?
  • Some clinicians have argued that, since ?
    blockers are effective for secondary prevention,
    they should be effective in primary prevention in
    hypertensive patients.
  • In other words

8
THE STUDY
  • Should beta blockers remain first choice in the
    treatment of primary hypertension?
  • A meta-analysis.
  • Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O.
  • Lancet. 2005 Oct 29-Nov 4366(9496)1545-53.

9
STUDY RELEVANCE
  • The Real Question Are you one of those
    clinicians?
  • Do you use ? blockers as your first choice in the
    treatment of primary hypertension?

10
STUDY RELEVANCE
  • The Other Real Question
  • Do your patients care?
  • Are outcomes such as stroke and myocardial
    infarction important to your patients?

11
STUDY VALIDITY
  • Search strategies
  • Cochrane Library,
  • PubMed, and
  • ASCOT-BPLA trial.

12
STUDY VALIDITY
  • Inclusion criteria
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Treatment of primary hypertension
  • ? blocker as 1st-line drug in at least 50 of all
    patients in one treatment group
  • outcome data for all-cause mortality,
    cardiovascular morbidity, or both

13
STUDY VALIDITY
  • Analysis
  • Heterogeneity between the studies was assessed
    with ?2 test and the chosen summary statistic
    variable was the reduction in relative risk (RR).
  • When the p value for heterogeneity in any
    analysis was 0.10, the random model was used for
    calculations.
  • (Uh Dave?)

14
(No Transcript)
15
STUDY VALIDITY
Several 1st line rx options but which had a
beta-blocker in at least 50 of pts in one
treatment group
16
STUDY RESULTS
  • ß-blockers vs. Other drugs
  • Relative risk of stroke was 16 higher with
    ß-blockers (95 CI 4-30 p0.009)
  • Atenolol 26 (15-38 plt0.0001)
  • Mixed trials 9 (-2-21 p0.13)
  • Non-atenolol inconclusive
  • RR of all-cause mortality trended similarly
    3 higher with ß-blockers (-1-8 p.14)
  • RR of MI showed no difference

17
STUDY RESULTS
  • ß-blockers vs. Placebo or No treatment
  • Relative risk of stroke was 19 lower with
    ß-blockers (95 CI 7-29)
  • 1 Mixed trial 45 (15-65)
  • Atenolol, Non-atenolol similar findings.
  • RR of all-cause mortality and MI showed no
    difference.

18
AUTHORS INTERPRETATION
  • In comparison with other antihypertensive drugs,
    the effect of ß-blockers is less than optimum,
    with a raised risk of stroke.
  • Hence, we believe that ß-blockers should not
    remain first choice in the treatment of primary
    hypertension and should not be used as reference
    drugs in future randomised controlled trials of
    hypertension.

19
DISCUSSION
  • Re-visiting Validity
  • Pitfalls of meta-analysis Losing your marbles
  • The value of enlarging large studies

20
DISCUSSION
  • Re-visiting Relevance
  • Do you use ? blockers as your first choice in the
    treatment of primary hypertension?
  • Selected patients?

21
DISCUSSION
  • Re-visiting Relevance
  • Did the authors build a straw man?
  • JNC 7 Report Thiazide-type diuretics should be
    used in drug treatment for most patients with
    uncomplicated hypertension, either alone or
    combined with drugs from other classes.

22
DISCUSSION
  • Re-visiting Relevance
  • JNC 7 Report Compelling indications

23
DISCUSSION
  • Re-visiting Relevance
  • Do your patients care?
  • Untreated hypertension
  • Increased stroke risk?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com